Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine

Abstract Background Detection of urinary casts is difficult due to their intermittent presence and deterioration in urine samples. Objective To compare the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® Urine Sediment Analyzer (SediVue) with manual microscopy for the detection of urinary casts. We hypothesize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Demitria M. Vasilatis, Larry D. Cowgill, Giosi Farace, Sarah Peterson, Murthy Yerramilli, Sean D. Owens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
dog
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16090
id doaj-222e780dfeb641ccbce472bb66d656ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-222e780dfeb641ccbce472bb66d656ff2021-07-14T06:50:34ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762021-05-013531439144710.1111/jvim.16090Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urineDemitria M. Vasilatis0Larry D. Cowgill1Giosi Farace2Sarah Peterson3Murthy Yerramilli4Sean D. Owens5Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine Davis California USADepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine Davis California USAIDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Westbrook Maine USAIDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Westbrook Maine USAIDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Westbrook Maine USADepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine Davis California USAAbstract Background Detection of urinary casts is difficult due to their intermittent presence and deterioration in urine samples. Objective To compare the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® Urine Sediment Analyzer (SediVue) with manual microscopy for the detection of urinary casts. We hypothesized that the SediVue analyzer would perform similarly to manual microscopy in cast detection. Animals Four hundred forty‐three samples from 420 dogs from a hospital population. Methods This is a prospective, cross‐sectional study. For SediVue analysis (software version [SW] 1.0.1.3), uncentrifuged urine was pipetted into a disposable cartridge. Seventy images were captured and processed by an onboard algorithm. For manual microscopy, urine was centrifuged to obtain sediment. Any cast identified by either method was considered a positive result (>0/low‐power field [LPF]). SediVue images were evaluated if casts were detected by either methodology. A revised sensitivity and specificity were calculated after image review and when using a threshold of >1 cast/LPF. Results The sensitivity of the SediVue analysis for the detection of urinary casts was 53.7% (43.85%‐63.35%), and specificity was 86.0% (81.78%‐89.51%). After image review, the revised sensitivity/specificity was 52.0% (42.89%‐61.02%) and 90.6% (86.81%‐93.54%), respectively. When using a more clinically relevant threshold of >1/LPF, the sensitivity was 52.6% (35.82%‐69.02%) and specificity was 99.3% (97.85%‐99.85%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance The SediVue provides moderate agreement to manual methodology for detection of casts in urine.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16090automated analyzerdogprevalenceurinalysisurine sediment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Demitria M. Vasilatis
Larry D. Cowgill
Giosi Farace
Sarah Peterson
Murthy Yerramilli
Sean D. Owens
spellingShingle Demitria M. Vasilatis
Larry D. Cowgill
Giosi Farace
Sarah Peterson
Murthy Yerramilli
Sean D. Owens
Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
automated analyzer
dog
prevalence
urinalysis
urine sediment
author_facet Demitria M. Vasilatis
Larry D. Cowgill
Giosi Farace
Sarah Peterson
Murthy Yerramilli
Sean D. Owens
author_sort Demitria M. Vasilatis
title Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
title_short Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
title_full Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
title_fullStr Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
title_sort comparison of idexx sedivue dx® urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Detection of urinary casts is difficult due to their intermittent presence and deterioration in urine samples. Objective To compare the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® Urine Sediment Analyzer (SediVue) with manual microscopy for the detection of urinary casts. We hypothesized that the SediVue analyzer would perform similarly to manual microscopy in cast detection. Animals Four hundred forty‐three samples from 420 dogs from a hospital population. Methods This is a prospective, cross‐sectional study. For SediVue analysis (software version [SW] 1.0.1.3), uncentrifuged urine was pipetted into a disposable cartridge. Seventy images were captured and processed by an onboard algorithm. For manual microscopy, urine was centrifuged to obtain sediment. Any cast identified by either method was considered a positive result (>0/low‐power field [LPF]). SediVue images were evaluated if casts were detected by either methodology. A revised sensitivity and specificity were calculated after image review and when using a threshold of >1 cast/LPF. Results The sensitivity of the SediVue analysis for the detection of urinary casts was 53.7% (43.85%‐63.35%), and specificity was 86.0% (81.78%‐89.51%). After image review, the revised sensitivity/specificity was 52.0% (42.89%‐61.02%) and 90.6% (86.81%‐93.54%), respectively. When using a more clinically relevant threshold of >1/LPF, the sensitivity was 52.6% (35.82%‐69.02%) and specificity was 99.3% (97.85%‐99.85%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance The SediVue provides moderate agreement to manual methodology for detection of casts in urine.
topic automated analyzer
dog
prevalence
urinalysis
urine sediment
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16090
work_keys_str_mv AT demitriamvasilatis comparisonofidexxsedivuedxurinesedimentanalyzertomanualmicroscopyfordetectionofcastsincanineurine
AT larrydcowgill comparisonofidexxsedivuedxurinesedimentanalyzertomanualmicroscopyfordetectionofcastsincanineurine
AT giosifarace comparisonofidexxsedivuedxurinesedimentanalyzertomanualmicroscopyfordetectionofcastsincanineurine
AT sarahpeterson comparisonofidexxsedivuedxurinesedimentanalyzertomanualmicroscopyfordetectionofcastsincanineurine
AT murthyyerramilli comparisonofidexxsedivuedxurinesedimentanalyzertomanualmicroscopyfordetectionofcastsincanineurine
AT seandowens comparisonofidexxsedivuedxurinesedimentanalyzertomanualmicroscopyfordetectionofcastsincanineurine
_version_ 1721303900359753728