Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
To evaluate comparative renal functional preservation, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and complications of thermal ablation (TA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) in management of Small renal masses (SRMs) in solitary kidney.Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systemat...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4484808?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-21e9797814ea457abdd9360a81b8506f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-21e9797814ea457abdd9360a81b8506f2020-11-24T21:58:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e013129010.1371/journal.pone.0131290Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.Quancheng YangFanzheng MengKai LiTong WangQingyuan NieZi CheMin LiuYan SunLin ZhaoTo evaluate comparative renal functional preservation, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and complications of thermal ablation (TA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) in management of Small renal masses (SRMs) in solitary kidney.Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A meta-analysis for comparative studies comparing TA with PN was performed. According to predefined inclusion criteria, seven datasets were identified from 8 observational studies including a total of 628 patients. Cumulated data showed the changes of creatinine (p=0.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.0001) in TA arm were significantly less than these in PN arm. Significantly less new-set chronic kidney disease (CKD) was observed in TA group (p=0.04). In terms of postoperative dialysis rate, the difference favoring TA was also noted, though there is no statistical significance (p=0.09). With regard to perioperative outcomes, our data demonstrated that patients who underwent TA had significantly shorter operation time (p=0.002), less blood loss (p<0.0001), shorter length of stay (p<0.00001), and less transfusion rate (p=0.01) than those underwent PN. In addition, patients underwent TA suffered less intra- and postoperative complications (p=0.007, p<0.00001; respectively). With regard to oncologic outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) (p<0.00001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p=0.01) in the PN arm were significantly better than these of the TA arm. But, TA yielded a comparable overall survival to PN (p=0.40). Sensitivity analyses led to very similar results with overall results, and confirmed its stability.Our analysis indicates that PN have advantage in controlling cancer recurrence. However, TA is associated with significantly better renal functional preservation and perioperative outcomes, and less complications without increasing overall death. Our data suggest that indication for TA may be extended to select younger, healthier patients who desire a much less invasive therapeutic option.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4484808?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Quancheng Yang Fanzheng Meng Kai Li Tong Wang Qingyuan Nie Zi Che Min Liu Yan Sun Lin Zhao |
spellingShingle |
Quancheng Yang Fanzheng Meng Kai Li Tong Wang Qingyuan Nie Zi Che Min Liu Yan Sun Lin Zhao Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Quancheng Yang Fanzheng Meng Kai Li Tong Wang Qingyuan Nie Zi Che Min Liu Yan Sun Lin Zhao |
author_sort |
Quancheng Yang |
title |
Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. |
title_short |
Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. |
title_full |
Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. |
title_fullStr |
Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. |
title_sort |
safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for small renal masses in solitary kidney: evidence from meta-analysis of comparative studies. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
To evaluate comparative renal functional preservation, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and complications of thermal ablation (TA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) in management of Small renal masses (SRMs) in solitary kidney.Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A meta-analysis for comparative studies comparing TA with PN was performed. According to predefined inclusion criteria, seven datasets were identified from 8 observational studies including a total of 628 patients. Cumulated data showed the changes of creatinine (p=0.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.0001) in TA arm were significantly less than these in PN arm. Significantly less new-set chronic kidney disease (CKD) was observed in TA group (p=0.04). In terms of postoperative dialysis rate, the difference favoring TA was also noted, though there is no statistical significance (p=0.09). With regard to perioperative outcomes, our data demonstrated that patients who underwent TA had significantly shorter operation time (p=0.002), less blood loss (p<0.0001), shorter length of stay (p<0.00001), and less transfusion rate (p=0.01) than those underwent PN. In addition, patients underwent TA suffered less intra- and postoperative complications (p=0.007, p<0.00001; respectively). With regard to oncologic outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) (p<0.00001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p=0.01) in the PN arm were significantly better than these of the TA arm. But, TA yielded a comparable overall survival to PN (p=0.40). Sensitivity analyses led to very similar results with overall results, and confirmed its stability.Our analysis indicates that PN have advantage in controlling cancer recurrence. However, TA is associated with significantly better renal functional preservation and perioperative outcomes, and less complications without increasing overall death. Our data suggest that indication for TA may be extended to select younger, healthier patients who desire a much less invasive therapeutic option. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4484808?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT quanchengyang safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT fanzhengmeng safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT kaili safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT tongwang safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT qingyuannie safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT ziche safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT minliu safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT yansun safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT linzhao safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies |
_version_ |
1725850881682833408 |