Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

To evaluate comparative renal functional preservation, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and complications of thermal ablation (TA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) in management of Small renal masses (SRMs) in solitary kidney.Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systemat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quancheng Yang, Fanzheng Meng, Kai Li, Tong Wang, Qingyuan Nie, Zi Che, Min Liu, Yan Sun, Lin Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4484808?pdf=render
id doaj-21e9797814ea457abdd9360a81b8506f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21e9797814ea457abdd9360a81b8506f2020-11-24T21:58:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e013129010.1371/journal.pone.0131290Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.Quancheng YangFanzheng MengKai LiTong WangQingyuan NieZi CheMin LiuYan SunLin ZhaoTo evaluate comparative renal functional preservation, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and complications of thermal ablation (TA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) in management of Small renal masses (SRMs) in solitary kidney.Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A meta-analysis for comparative studies comparing TA with PN was performed. According to predefined inclusion criteria, seven datasets were identified from 8 observational studies including a total of 628 patients. Cumulated data showed the changes of creatinine (p=0.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.0001) in TA arm were significantly less than these in PN arm. Significantly less new-set chronic kidney disease (CKD) was observed in TA group (p=0.04). In terms of postoperative dialysis rate, the difference favoring TA was also noted, though there is no statistical significance (p=0.09). With regard to perioperative outcomes, our data demonstrated that patients who underwent TA had significantly shorter operation time (p=0.002), less blood loss (p<0.0001), shorter length of stay (p<0.00001), and less transfusion rate (p=0.01) than those underwent PN. In addition, patients underwent TA suffered less intra- and postoperative complications (p=0.007, p<0.00001; respectively). With regard to oncologic outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) (p<0.00001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p=0.01) in the PN arm were significantly better than these of the TA arm. But, TA yielded a comparable overall survival to PN (p=0.40). Sensitivity analyses led to very similar results with overall results, and confirmed its stability.Our analysis indicates that PN have advantage in controlling cancer recurrence. However, TA is associated with significantly better renal functional preservation and perioperative outcomes, and less complications without increasing overall death. Our data suggest that indication for TA may be extended to select younger, healthier patients who desire a much less invasive therapeutic option.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4484808?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Quancheng Yang
Fanzheng Meng
Kai Li
Tong Wang
Qingyuan Nie
Zi Che
Min Liu
Yan Sun
Lin Zhao
spellingShingle Quancheng Yang
Fanzheng Meng
Kai Li
Tong Wang
Qingyuan Nie
Zi Che
Min Liu
Yan Sun
Lin Zhao
Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Quancheng Yang
Fanzheng Meng
Kai Li
Tong Wang
Qingyuan Nie
Zi Che
Min Liu
Yan Sun
Lin Zhao
author_sort Quancheng Yang
title Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidney: Evidence from Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
title_sort safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for small renal masses in solitary kidney: evidence from meta-analysis of comparative studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description To evaluate comparative renal functional preservation, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and complications of thermal ablation (TA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) in management of Small renal masses (SRMs) in solitary kidney.Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A meta-analysis for comparative studies comparing TA with PN was performed. According to predefined inclusion criteria, seven datasets were identified from 8 observational studies including a total of 628 patients. Cumulated data showed the changes of creatinine (p=0.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.0001) in TA arm were significantly less than these in PN arm. Significantly less new-set chronic kidney disease (CKD) was observed in TA group (p=0.04). In terms of postoperative dialysis rate, the difference favoring TA was also noted, though there is no statistical significance (p=0.09). With regard to perioperative outcomes, our data demonstrated that patients who underwent TA had significantly shorter operation time (p=0.002), less blood loss (p<0.0001), shorter length of stay (p<0.00001), and less transfusion rate (p=0.01) than those underwent PN. In addition, patients underwent TA suffered less intra- and postoperative complications (p=0.007, p<0.00001; respectively). With regard to oncologic outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) (p<0.00001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p=0.01) in the PN arm were significantly better than these of the TA arm. But, TA yielded a comparable overall survival to PN (p=0.40). Sensitivity analyses led to very similar results with overall results, and confirmed its stability.Our analysis indicates that PN have advantage in controlling cancer recurrence. However, TA is associated with significantly better renal functional preservation and perioperative outcomes, and less complications without increasing overall death. Our data suggest that indication for TA may be extended to select younger, healthier patients who desire a much less invasive therapeutic option.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4484808?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT quanchengyang safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT fanzhengmeng safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT kaili safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT tongwang safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT qingyuannie safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT ziche safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT minliu safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT yansun safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT linzhao safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsmallrenalmassesinsolitarykidneyevidencefrommetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
_version_ 1725850881682833408