Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Recent research has shown that errors seem to influence the patterns of brain activity. Additionally current notions support the idea that similar brain mechanisms are activated during acting and observing. The aim of the present stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ventouras Errikos M, Matsopoulos George K, Tsianaka Eleni I, Papageorgiou Charalabos, Karanasiou Irene S, Uzunoglu Nikolaos K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-01-01
Series:Behavioral and Brain Functions
Online Access:http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/5
id doaj-21d798c9fff64d4c8d8d8d82a58d8112
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21d798c9fff64d4c8d8d8d82a58d81122020-11-25T02:19:06ZengBMCBehavioral and Brain Functions1744-90812009-01-0151510.1186/1744-9081-5-5Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory taskVentouras Errikos MMatsopoulos George KTsianaka Eleni IPapageorgiou CharalabosKaranasiou Irene SUzunoglu Nikolaos K<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Recent research has shown that errors seem to influence the patterns of brain activity. Additionally current notions support the idea that similar brain mechanisms are activated during acting and observing. The aim of the present study was to examine the patterns of brain activity of actors and observers elicited upon receiving feedback information of the actor's response.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The task used in the present research was an auditory identification task that included both acting and observing settings, ensuring concurrent ERP measurements of both participants. The performance of the participants was investigated in conditions of varying complexity. ERP data were analyzed with regards to the conditions of acting and observing in conjunction to correct and erroneous responses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The obtained results showed that the complexity induced by cue dissimilarity between trials was a demodulating factor leading to poorer performance. The electrophysiological results suggest that feedback information results in different intensities of the ERP patterns of observers and actors depending on whether the actor had made an error or not. The LORETA source localization method yielded significantly larger electrical activity in the supplementary motor area (Brodmann area 6), the posterior cingulate gyrus (Brodmann area 31/23) and the parietal lobe (Precuneus/Brodmann area 7/5).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These findings suggest that feedback information has a different effect on the intensities of the ERP patterns of actors and observers depending on whether the actor committed an error. Certain neural systems, including medial frontal area, posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus may mediate these modulating effects. Further research is needed to elucidate in more detail the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological substrates of these systems.</p> http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ventouras Errikos M
Matsopoulos George K
Tsianaka Eleni I
Papageorgiou Charalabos
Karanasiou Irene S
Uzunoglu Nikolaos K
spellingShingle Ventouras Errikos M
Matsopoulos George K
Tsianaka Eleni I
Papageorgiou Charalabos
Karanasiou Irene S
Uzunoglu Nikolaos K
Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
Behavioral and Brain Functions
author_facet Ventouras Errikos M
Matsopoulos George K
Tsianaka Eleni I
Papageorgiou Charalabos
Karanasiou Irene S
Uzunoglu Nikolaos K
author_sort Ventouras Errikos M
title Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_short Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_full Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_fullStr Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_sort behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
publisher BMC
series Behavioral and Brain Functions
issn 1744-9081
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Recent research has shown that errors seem to influence the patterns of brain activity. Additionally current notions support the idea that similar brain mechanisms are activated during acting and observing. The aim of the present study was to examine the patterns of brain activity of actors and observers elicited upon receiving feedback information of the actor's response.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The task used in the present research was an auditory identification task that included both acting and observing settings, ensuring concurrent ERP measurements of both participants. The performance of the participants was investigated in conditions of varying complexity. ERP data were analyzed with regards to the conditions of acting and observing in conjunction to correct and erroneous responses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The obtained results showed that the complexity induced by cue dissimilarity between trials was a demodulating factor leading to poorer performance. The electrophysiological results suggest that feedback information results in different intensities of the ERP patterns of observers and actors depending on whether the actor had made an error or not. The LORETA source localization method yielded significantly larger electrical activity in the supplementary motor area (Brodmann area 6), the posterior cingulate gyrus (Brodmann area 31/23) and the parietal lobe (Precuneus/Brodmann area 7/5).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These findings suggest that feedback information has a different effect on the intensities of the ERP patterns of actors and observers depending on whether the actor committed an error. Certain neural systems, including medial frontal area, posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus may mediate these modulating effects. Further research is needed to elucidate in more detail the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological substrates of these systems.</p>
url http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT ventouraserrikosm behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT matsopoulosgeorgek behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT tsianakaelenii behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT papageorgioucharalabos behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT karanasiouirenes behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT uzunoglunikolaosk behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
_version_ 1724878561124286464