The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression

Land Use Regression (LUR) is one of the air quality assessment modelling techniques. Its advantages lie mainly in a much simpler mathematical apparatus, quicker and simpler calculations, and a possibility to incorporate more factors affecting pollutant concentration than standard dispersion models....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Bitta, Vladislav Svozilík, Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
use
air
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/452
id doaj-21d716d44bba448c9a26d234203af94c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21d716d44bba448c9a26d234203af94c2021-04-01T23:08:22ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-04-011245245210.3390/atmos12040452The Neural Network Assisted Land Use RegressionJan Bitta0Vladislav Svozilík1Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská2Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow Region, 141980 Dubna, RussiaLaboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow Region, 141980 Dubna, RussiaFaculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech RepublicLand Use Regression (LUR) is one of the air quality assessment modelling techniques. Its advantages lie mainly in a much simpler mathematical apparatus, quicker and simpler calculations, and a possibility to incorporate more factors affecting pollutant concentration than standard dispersion models. The goal of the study was to perform the LUR model in the Polish-Czech-Slovakian Tritia region, to test two sets of pollution data input factors, i.e., factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results, to test regression via neural networks and compare it with standard linear regression. Both input datasets, emission data and pollution dispersion model results, provided a similar quality of results in the case when standard linear regression was used, the R<sup>2</sup> of the models was 0.639 and 0.652. Neural network regression provided a significantly higher quality of the models, their R<sup>2</sup> was 0.937 and 0.938 for the factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/452landuseregressionmodelairpollution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Bitta
Vladislav Svozilík
Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská
spellingShingle Jan Bitta
Vladislav Svozilík
Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská
The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
Atmosphere
land
use
regression
model
air
pollution
author_facet Jan Bitta
Vladislav Svozilík
Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská
author_sort Jan Bitta
title The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
title_short The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
title_full The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
title_fullStr The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
title_full_unstemmed The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
title_sort neural network assisted land use regression
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Land Use Regression (LUR) is one of the air quality assessment modelling techniques. Its advantages lie mainly in a much simpler mathematical apparatus, quicker and simpler calculations, and a possibility to incorporate more factors affecting pollutant concentration than standard dispersion models. The goal of the study was to perform the LUR model in the Polish-Czech-Slovakian Tritia region, to test two sets of pollution data input factors, i.e., factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results, to test regression via neural networks and compare it with standard linear regression. Both input datasets, emission data and pollution dispersion model results, provided a similar quality of results in the case when standard linear regression was used, the R<sup>2</sup> of the models was 0.639 and 0.652. Neural network regression provided a significantly higher quality of the models, their R<sup>2</sup> was 0.937 and 0.938 for the factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results respectively.
topic land
use
regression
model
air
pollution
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/452
work_keys_str_mv AT janbitta theneuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression
AT vladislavsvozilik theneuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression
AT anetasvozilikovakrakovska theneuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression
AT janbitta neuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression
AT vladislavsvozilik neuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression
AT anetasvozilikovakrakovska neuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression
_version_ 1724175511189454848