The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression
Land Use Regression (LUR) is one of the air quality assessment modelling techniques. Its advantages lie mainly in a much simpler mathematical apparatus, quicker and simpler calculations, and a possibility to incorporate more factors affecting pollutant concentration than standard dispersion models....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Atmosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/452 |
id |
doaj-21d716d44bba448c9a26d234203af94c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-21d716d44bba448c9a26d234203af94c2021-04-01T23:08:22ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-04-011245245210.3390/atmos12040452The Neural Network Assisted Land Use RegressionJan Bitta0Vladislav Svozilík1Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská2Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow Region, 141980 Dubna, RussiaLaboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow Region, 141980 Dubna, RussiaFaculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech RepublicLand Use Regression (LUR) is one of the air quality assessment modelling techniques. Its advantages lie mainly in a much simpler mathematical apparatus, quicker and simpler calculations, and a possibility to incorporate more factors affecting pollutant concentration than standard dispersion models. The goal of the study was to perform the LUR model in the Polish-Czech-Slovakian Tritia region, to test two sets of pollution data input factors, i.e., factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results, to test regression via neural networks and compare it with standard linear regression. Both input datasets, emission data and pollution dispersion model results, provided a similar quality of results in the case when standard linear regression was used, the R<sup>2</sup> of the models was 0.639 and 0.652. Neural network regression provided a significantly higher quality of the models, their R<sup>2</sup> was 0.937 and 0.938 for the factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/452landuseregressionmodelairpollution |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jan Bitta Vladislav Svozilík Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská |
spellingShingle |
Jan Bitta Vladislav Svozilík Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression Atmosphere land use regression model air pollution |
author_facet |
Jan Bitta Vladislav Svozilík Aneta Svozilíková Krakovská |
author_sort |
Jan Bitta |
title |
The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression |
title_short |
The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression |
title_full |
The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression |
title_fullStr |
The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Neural Network Assisted Land Use Regression |
title_sort |
neural network assisted land use regression |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Atmosphere |
issn |
2073-4433 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Land Use Regression (LUR) is one of the air quality assessment modelling techniques. Its advantages lie mainly in a much simpler mathematical apparatus, quicker and simpler calculations, and a possibility to incorporate more factors affecting pollutant concentration than standard dispersion models. The goal of the study was to perform the LUR model in the Polish-Czech-Slovakian Tritia region, to test two sets of pollution data input factors, i.e., factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results, to test regression via neural networks and compare it with standard linear regression. Both input datasets, emission data and pollution dispersion model results, provided a similar quality of results in the case when standard linear regression was used, the R<sup>2</sup> of the models was 0.639 and 0.652. Neural network regression provided a significantly higher quality of the models, their R<sup>2</sup> was 0.937 and 0.938 for the factors based on emission data and pollution dispersion model results respectively. |
topic |
land use regression model air pollution |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/4/452 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janbitta theneuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression AT vladislavsvozilik theneuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression AT anetasvozilikovakrakovska theneuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression AT janbitta neuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression AT vladislavsvozilik neuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression AT anetasvozilikovakrakovska neuralnetworkassistedlanduseregression |
_version_ |
1724175511189454848 |