Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk

Scattered trees are frequently considered “keystone structures” due to their disproportionate contribution in facilitating movement across the landscape. However, which landscape structure scattered trees best facilitate animal movement in the most effective manner remains poorly understood in the l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Magalhães Silva, Jader Augusto Costa Pereira, Júlia Dell Sol Passos Gusmões, Barbara Emanuelle Penha Mendes, Halissa Valente, Ana Paula Morgan, Dhiéssica Goulart, Érica Hasui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-04-01
Series:Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064420300158
id doaj-21b9907c3c5249819d27d230db68bc56
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cristina Magalhães Silva
Jader Augusto Costa Pereira
Júlia Dell Sol Passos Gusmões
Barbara Emanuelle Penha Mendes
Halissa Valente
Ana Paula Morgan
Dhiéssica Goulart
Érica Hasui
spellingShingle Cristina Magalhães Silva
Jader Augusto Costa Pereira
Júlia Dell Sol Passos Gusmões
Barbara Emanuelle Penha Mendes
Halissa Valente
Ana Paula Morgan
Dhiéssica Goulart
Érica Hasui
Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Paddock trees
Functional connectivity
Animal movement
Stepping stones
Forest cover
author_facet Cristina Magalhães Silva
Jader Augusto Costa Pereira
Júlia Dell Sol Passos Gusmões
Barbara Emanuelle Penha Mendes
Halissa Valente
Ana Paula Morgan
Dhiéssica Goulart
Érica Hasui
author_sort Cristina Magalhães Silva
title Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
title_short Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
title_full Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
title_fullStr Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
title_full_unstemmed Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
title_sort birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk
publisher Elsevier
series Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
issn 2530-0644
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Scattered trees are frequently considered “keystone structures” due to their disproportionate contribution in facilitating movement across the landscape. However, which landscape structure scattered trees best facilitate animal movement in the most effective manner remains poorly understood in the literature. Here, we tested three hypotheses examining how scattered trees influenced natural bird movement across an open matrix. We used three bird sampling methods: line transect, point count, and focal tree sampling. Our results showed that the efficacy of scattering trees as stepping stones and/or as a source of resources is mainly conditioned by three factors: predation risk, tree size, and landscape context in which the trees are inserted in an open matrix. In general, movement between habitat patches (gap-crossings) were more frequent in shorter distances (mean = 10.9 m). For larger gaps, the addition of scattered trees as stepping stones in the movement path is essential in reaching the neighboring habitat patches. The functional drivers of scattered trees are mainly related to perching, eating, and reproducing. Their functions increase with tree size and distance to the nearest patch. In relation to landscape context, birds prefer scattered trees surrounded by higher amounts of forest cover or with a network of higher aggregation trees. All these decision-making outcomes suggest antipredatory strategies during bird movement across landscapes including: (1) reducing the distance required to reach safer shelter; (2) choosing larger scattered trees as stepping stones, which improves a birds’ ability to detect predators, before deciding on the next movement; (3) choosing the movement path in the landscape context that most reduces the ability of predators to detect them or that increases the probability of escape from a predator. Land managers who wish to facilitate bird movements in open matrices should ensure gaps between landscape elements are less than 40 m; preserve and actively plant arboreal individuals of tree species (height > 15 m) in open matrices; increase spatial aggregation of scattered trees or use them in landscapes with higher amounts of forest cover.
topic Paddock trees
Functional connectivity
Animal movement
Stepping stones
Forest cover
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064420300158
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinamagalhaessilva birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT jaderaugustocostapereira birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT juliadellsolpassosgusmoes birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT barbaraemanuellepenhamendes birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT halissavalente birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT anapaulamorgan birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT dhiessicagoulart birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
AT ericahasui birdsgapcrossinginopenmatricesdependsonlandscapestructuretreesizeandpredationrisk
_version_ 1724364958492262400
spelling doaj-21b9907c3c5249819d27d230db68bc562020-12-31T04:43:40ZengElsevierPerspectives in Ecology and Conservation2530-06442020-04-011827382Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation riskCristina Magalhães Silva0Jader Augusto Costa Pereira1Júlia Dell Sol Passos Gusmões2Barbara Emanuelle Penha Mendes3Halissa Valente4Ana Paula Morgan5Dhiéssica Goulart6Érica Hasui7Laboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilCorresponding author.; Laboratory of Ecology and Forest Fragments – ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, CEP 37130-000, Alfenas, MG, BrazilScattered trees are frequently considered “keystone structures” due to their disproportionate contribution in facilitating movement across the landscape. However, which landscape structure scattered trees best facilitate animal movement in the most effective manner remains poorly understood in the literature. Here, we tested three hypotheses examining how scattered trees influenced natural bird movement across an open matrix. We used three bird sampling methods: line transect, point count, and focal tree sampling. Our results showed that the efficacy of scattering trees as stepping stones and/or as a source of resources is mainly conditioned by three factors: predation risk, tree size, and landscape context in which the trees are inserted in an open matrix. In general, movement between habitat patches (gap-crossings) were more frequent in shorter distances (mean = 10.9 m). For larger gaps, the addition of scattered trees as stepping stones in the movement path is essential in reaching the neighboring habitat patches. The functional drivers of scattered trees are mainly related to perching, eating, and reproducing. Their functions increase with tree size and distance to the nearest patch. In relation to landscape context, birds prefer scattered trees surrounded by higher amounts of forest cover or with a network of higher aggregation trees. All these decision-making outcomes suggest antipredatory strategies during bird movement across landscapes including: (1) reducing the distance required to reach safer shelter; (2) choosing larger scattered trees as stepping stones, which improves a birds’ ability to detect predators, before deciding on the next movement; (3) choosing the movement path in the landscape context that most reduces the ability of predators to detect them or that increases the probability of escape from a predator. Land managers who wish to facilitate bird movements in open matrices should ensure gaps between landscape elements are less than 40 m; preserve and actively plant arboreal individuals of tree species (height > 15 m) in open matrices; increase spatial aggregation of scattered trees or use them in landscapes with higher amounts of forest cover.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064420300158Paddock treesFunctional connectivityAnimal movementStepping stonesForest cover