Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
It is preferable to remove as much raw material in as short time as possible when processing materials using rough turning methods. Selecting the correct cutting tool at the beginning of the process is very important as this reduces the amount of material requiring later processing, in turn reducing...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Osijek
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Tehnički Vjesnik |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/277448 |
id |
doaj-21b0454814da4cb7928430c33562a525 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-21b0454814da4cb7928430c33562a5252020-11-25T00:09:32ZengFaculty of Mechanical Engineering in Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Osijek Tehnički Vjesnik1330-36511848-63392017-01-0124513551360Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methodsJože Balič0Zoran Jurković1Zlatko Botak2University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, SloveniaUniversity of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, CroatiaUniversity North, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 104. brigade 3, 42000 Varaždin, CroatiaIt is preferable to remove as much raw material in as short time as possible when processing materials using rough turning methods. Selecting the correct cutting tool at the beginning of the process is very important as this reduces the amount of material requiring later processing, in turn reducing the number of turning tools required, the number of tool changes and the total time taken to make a piece. In this paper, we present a system for selecting the best tools for external longitudinal turning. We take into account the characteristics of the machine, the power needed for cutting, the geometry and technological characteristics of the tools, and the machining parameters. Selection of the best tool for rough machining is made based on the processing time, the percentage of material to be cut, the cost of the tools and the number of tool changes. We ranked eight tools and used the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi-criteria optimisation then evaluated the results using ELECTRE II methods. The weight criteria were estimated using Saaty’s pairwise comparison scale.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/277448analytic hierarchy processELECTRE II methodmulti-criteria decision-makingtool selection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jože Balič Zoran Jurković Zlatko Botak |
spellingShingle |
Jože Balič Zoran Jurković Zlatko Botak Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods Tehnički Vjesnik analytic hierarchy process ELECTRE II method multi-criteria decision-making tool selection |
author_facet |
Jože Balič Zoran Jurković Zlatko Botak |
author_sort |
Jože Balič |
title |
Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods |
title_short |
Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods |
title_full |
Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods |
title_fullStr |
Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods |
title_sort |
optimising external turning tool choice using ahp and electre ii methods |
publisher |
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Osijek |
series |
Tehnički Vjesnik |
issn |
1330-3651 1848-6339 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
It is preferable to remove as much raw material in as short time as possible when processing materials using rough turning methods. Selecting the correct cutting tool at the beginning of the process is very important as this reduces the amount of material requiring later processing, in turn reducing the number of turning tools required, the number of tool changes and the total time taken to make a piece. In this paper, we present a system for selecting the best tools for external longitudinal turning. We take into account the characteristics of the machine, the power needed for cutting, the geometry and technological characteristics of the tools, and the machining parameters. Selection of the best tool for rough machining is made based on the processing time, the percentage of material to be cut, the cost of the tools and the number of tool changes. We ranked eight tools and used the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi-criteria optimisation then evaluated the results using ELECTRE II methods. The weight criteria were estimated using Saaty’s pairwise comparison scale. |
topic |
analytic hierarchy process ELECTRE II method multi-criteria decision-making tool selection |
url |
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/277448 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jozebalic optimisingexternalturningtoolchoiceusingahpandelectreiimethods AT zoranjurkovic optimisingexternalturningtoolchoiceusingahpandelectreiimethods AT zlatkobotak optimisingexternalturningtoolchoiceusingahpandelectreiimethods |
_version_ |
1725411411859865600 |