Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods

It is preferable to remove as much raw material in as short time as possible when processing materials using rough turning methods. Selecting the correct cutting tool at the beginning of the process is very important as this reduces the amount of material requiring later processing, in turn reducing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jože Balič, Zoran Jurković, Zlatko Botak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Osijek 2017-01-01
Series:Tehnički Vjesnik
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/277448
id doaj-21b0454814da4cb7928430c33562a525
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21b0454814da4cb7928430c33562a5252020-11-25T00:09:32ZengFaculty of Mechanical Engineering in Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Osijek Tehnički Vjesnik1330-36511848-63392017-01-0124513551360Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methodsJože Balič0Zoran Jurković1Zlatko Botak2University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, SloveniaUniversity of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, CroatiaUniversity North, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 104. brigade 3, 42000 Varaždin, CroatiaIt is preferable to remove as much raw material in as short time as possible when processing materials using rough turning methods. Selecting the correct cutting tool at the beginning of the process is very important as this reduces the amount of material requiring later processing, in turn reducing the number of turning tools required, the number of tool changes and the total time taken to make a piece. In this paper, we present a system for selecting the best tools for external longitudinal turning. We take into account the characteristics of the machine, the power needed for cutting, the geometry and technological characteristics of the tools, and the machining parameters. Selection of the best tool for rough machining is made based on the processing time, the percentage of material to be cut, the cost of the tools and the number of tool changes. We ranked eight tools and used the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi-criteria optimisation then evaluated the results using ELECTRE II methods. The weight criteria were estimated using Saaty’s pairwise comparison scale.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/277448analytic hierarchy processELECTRE II methodmulti-criteria decision-makingtool selection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jože Balič
Zoran Jurković
Zlatko Botak
spellingShingle Jože Balič
Zoran Jurković
Zlatko Botak
Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
Tehnički Vjesnik
analytic hierarchy process
ELECTRE II method
multi-criteria decision-making
tool selection
author_facet Jože Balič
Zoran Jurković
Zlatko Botak
author_sort Jože Balič
title Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
title_short Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
title_full Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
title_fullStr Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
title_full_unstemmed Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods
title_sort optimising external turning tool choice using ahp and electre ii methods
publisher Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Osijek
series Tehnički Vjesnik
issn 1330-3651
1848-6339
publishDate 2017-01-01
description It is preferable to remove as much raw material in as short time as possible when processing materials using rough turning methods. Selecting the correct cutting tool at the beginning of the process is very important as this reduces the amount of material requiring later processing, in turn reducing the number of turning tools required, the number of tool changes and the total time taken to make a piece. In this paper, we present a system for selecting the best tools for external longitudinal turning. We take into account the characteristics of the machine, the power needed for cutting, the geometry and technological characteristics of the tools, and the machining parameters. Selection of the best tool for rough machining is made based on the processing time, the percentage of material to be cut, the cost of the tools and the number of tool changes. We ranked eight tools and used the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi-criteria optimisation then evaluated the results using ELECTRE II methods. The weight criteria were estimated using Saaty’s pairwise comparison scale.
topic analytic hierarchy process
ELECTRE II method
multi-criteria decision-making
tool selection
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/277448
work_keys_str_mv AT jozebalic optimisingexternalturningtoolchoiceusingahpandelectreiimethods
AT zoranjurkovic optimisingexternalturningtoolchoiceusingahpandelectreiimethods
AT zlatkobotak optimisingexternalturningtoolchoiceusingahpandelectreiimethods
_version_ 1725411411859865600