Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatments for cancer spinal metastasis were always palliative. This study was conducted to investigate the safety and effectiveness of IG-IMRT for these patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>10 metastatic lesions w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiang Xiaoqin, Bai Sen, Wang Jin, Gong Youling, Xu Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-04-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/3/1/11
id doaj-219f52a778d14a32b8936b1c0955e0e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-219f52a778d14a32b8936b1c0955e0e12020-11-25T00:23:29ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2008-04-01311110.1186/1748-717X-3-11Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasisJiang XiaoqinBai SenWang JinGong YoulingXu Feng<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatments for cancer spinal metastasis were always palliative. This study was conducted to investigate the safety and effectiveness of IG-IMRT for these patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>10 metastatic lesions were treated with conventionally-fractionated IG-IMRT. Daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) scan was applied to ensure accurate positioning. Plans were evaluated by the dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Before set-up correction, the positioning errors in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes were 0.3 ± 3.2, 0.4 ± 4.5 and -0.2 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. After repositioning, those errors were 0.1 ± 0.7, 0 ± 0.8 and 0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. The systematic/random uncertainties ranged 1.4–2.3/3.0–4.1 before and 0.1–0.2/0.7–0.8 mm after online set-up correction. In the original IMRT plans, the average dose of the planning target volume (PTV) was 61.9 Gy, with the spinal cord dose less than 49 Gy. Compared to the simulated PTVs based on the pre-correction CBCT, the average volume reduction of PTVs was 42.3% after online correction. Also, organ at risk (OAR) all benefited from CBCT-based set-up correction and had significant dose reduction with IGRT technique. Clinically, most patients had prompt pain relief within one month of treatment. There was no radiation-induced toxicity detected clinically during a median follow-up of 15.6 months.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>IG-IMRT provides a new approach to treat cancer spinal metastasis. The precise positioning ensures the implementation of optimal IMRT plan, satisfying both the dose escalation of tumor targets and the radiation tolerance of spinal cord. It might benefit the cancer patient with spinal metastasis.</p> http://www.ro-journal.com/content/3/1/11
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiang Xiaoqin
Bai Sen
Wang Jin
Gong Youling
Xu Feng
spellingShingle Jiang Xiaoqin
Bai Sen
Wang Jin
Gong Youling
Xu Feng
Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
Radiation Oncology
author_facet Jiang Xiaoqin
Bai Sen
Wang Jin
Gong Youling
Xu Feng
author_sort Jiang Xiaoqin
title Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
title_short Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
title_full Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
title_fullStr Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
title_sort conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (ig-imrt): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2008-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatments for cancer spinal metastasis were always palliative. This study was conducted to investigate the safety and effectiveness of IG-IMRT for these patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>10 metastatic lesions were treated with conventionally-fractionated IG-IMRT. Daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) scan was applied to ensure accurate positioning. Plans were evaluated by the dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Before set-up correction, the positioning errors in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes were 0.3 ± 3.2, 0.4 ± 4.5 and -0.2 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. After repositioning, those errors were 0.1 ± 0.7, 0 ± 0.8 and 0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. The systematic/random uncertainties ranged 1.4–2.3/3.0–4.1 before and 0.1–0.2/0.7–0.8 mm after online set-up correction. In the original IMRT plans, the average dose of the planning target volume (PTV) was 61.9 Gy, with the spinal cord dose less than 49 Gy. Compared to the simulated PTVs based on the pre-correction CBCT, the average volume reduction of PTVs was 42.3% after online correction. Also, organ at risk (OAR) all benefited from CBCT-based set-up correction and had significant dose reduction with IGRT technique. Clinically, most patients had prompt pain relief within one month of treatment. There was no radiation-induced toxicity detected clinically during a median follow-up of 15.6 months.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>IG-IMRT provides a new approach to treat cancer spinal metastasis. The precise positioning ensures the implementation of optimal IMRT plan, satisfying both the dose escalation of tumor targets and the radiation tolerance of spinal cord. It might benefit the cancer patient with spinal metastasis.</p>
url http://www.ro-journal.com/content/3/1/11
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangxiaoqin conventionallyfractionatedimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyigimrtasafeandeffectivetreatmentforcancerspinalmetastasis
AT baisen conventionallyfractionatedimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyigimrtasafeandeffectivetreatmentforcancerspinalmetastasis
AT wangjin conventionallyfractionatedimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyigimrtasafeandeffectivetreatmentforcancerspinalmetastasis
AT gongyouling conventionallyfractionatedimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyigimrtasafeandeffectivetreatmentforcancerspinalmetastasis
AT xufeng conventionallyfractionatedimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyigimrtasafeandeffectivetreatmentforcancerspinalmetastasis
_version_ 1725356762838597632