Real-Time Operative Coding for Endoscopic Sinonasal Procedures: Quality Improvement in Practice

• Main Authors: Bassem Mettias, Joshua D. Whittaker, Yujay Ramakrishnan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
• Series: Sinusitis
• Subjects: sinus surgery; clinical coding; finance
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-351X/5/1/4

<i>Objective</i>: investigate the impact of an intraoperative coding sticker (ICS) on the accuracy of coding in endoscopic sinonasal procedures. <i>Methods</i>: this was a two-cycle audit evaluating the accuracy (and financial impact) of intraoperative coding of sinonasal procedures at a single tertiary centre. An ICS was introduced following consultation with the coding department. The accuracy of coding was measured before (cycle 1) and after (cycle 2) the ICS was introduced to a pilot firm and compared to a control firm. The ICS was used in 35% of the pilot firm cases. <i>Results</i>: the accuracy of clinical coding for endoscopic sinus surgery was 60% in the first cycle. Switching to the ICS has improved the accuracy in that firm from 50% in first cycle to 70% in the second cycle (<i>p</i> = 0.936; Chi-squared test). The median reimbursement for endoscopic sinus surgery was equal in both cycles of £1493.00 per patient. However, inaccurate coding resulted in £109.92 excess tariff payment in first cycle and £130.96 deficiency in the second cycle. Users of ICS reported it to be easy to use for clinicians, staff and clinical coders, whilst minimizing human error. <i>Conclusions</i>: The integration of the ICS improves the coding in sinonasal procedures and offers low-fidelity option alternative to live coding on the computer. The accuracy was not statistically significant in the study possibly due to the low number of observations. This can allow a precise coding standard with reliable service remuneration.