Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species

Abstract Prairie plants of the U.S. Midwest are used for stormwater management because of their purported belowground biomass, but species‐specific data are lacking by which hundreds of prairie species may be evaluated with respect to potential biomass. We hypothesize that aboveground traits could b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie R. Johnston, Nick J. Balster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20059
id doaj-21913825410b4826978a423126339f6d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21913825410b4826978a423126339f6d2021-02-19T11:21:42ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962020-01-0131n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20059Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie speciesMarie R. Johnston0Nick J. Balster1Dep. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison 1525 Observatory Dr. Madison WI 53706 USADep. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison 1525 Observatory Dr. Madison WI 53706 USAAbstract Prairie plants of the U.S. Midwest are used for stormwater management because of their purported belowground biomass, but species‐specific data are lacking by which hundreds of prairie species may be evaluated with respect to potential biomass. We hypothesize that aboveground traits could be used to define differences in biomass accumulation to leaves, stems, and roots among prairie plants. Sixteen species of wet‐mesic prairie vegetation common to urban plantings of the Midwest were grown in monoculture to quantify accumulated biomass after 2 yr. Species were grouped in accordance with aboveground morphology and flowering phenology to test for differences in biomass accrual and crown characteristics. Although the species of forbs were as different from one another in leaf, stem, and root biomass as were all forbs together vs. graminoids, grouping plants by aboveground form and flowering phenology helped discern functional differences. Differences among groupings based on aboveground traits are supported by conceptual frameworks through which plant biomass accrual is linked to crown height, leaf area, and growth strategy. These results suggest aboveground traits could inform the selection and/or substitution of prairie species for different uses within urban plantings.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20059
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie R. Johnston
Nick J. Balster
spellingShingle Marie R. Johnston
Nick J. Balster
Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
author_facet Marie R. Johnston
Nick J. Balster
author_sort Marie R. Johnston
title Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
title_short Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
title_full Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
title_fullStr Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
title_full_unstemmed Aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
title_sort aboveground traits define differences in biomass allocation among 16 prairie species
publisher Wiley
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
issn 2639-6696
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Prairie plants of the U.S. Midwest are used for stormwater management because of their purported belowground biomass, but species‐specific data are lacking by which hundreds of prairie species may be evaluated with respect to potential biomass. We hypothesize that aboveground traits could be used to define differences in biomass accumulation to leaves, stems, and roots among prairie plants. Sixteen species of wet‐mesic prairie vegetation common to urban plantings of the Midwest were grown in monoculture to quantify accumulated biomass after 2 yr. Species were grouped in accordance with aboveground morphology and flowering phenology to test for differences in biomass accrual and crown characteristics. Although the species of forbs were as different from one another in leaf, stem, and root biomass as were all forbs together vs. graminoids, grouping plants by aboveground form and flowering phenology helped discern functional differences. Differences among groupings based on aboveground traits are supported by conceptual frameworks through which plant biomass accrual is linked to crown height, leaf area, and growth strategy. These results suggest aboveground traits could inform the selection and/or substitution of prairie species for different uses within urban plantings.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20059
work_keys_str_mv AT marierjohnston abovegroundtraitsdefinedifferencesinbiomassallocationamong16prairiespecies
AT nickjbalster abovegroundtraitsdefinedifferencesinbiomassallocationamong16prairiespecies
_version_ 1724261234860097536