Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques

The temperature of river water (TRW) is an important factor in river ecosystem predictions. This study aims to compare two different types of numerical model for predicting daily TRW in the Warta River basin in Poland. The implemented models were of the stochastic type—Autoregressive (AR), Moving Av...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renata Graf, Pouya Aghelpour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/9/1154
id doaj-218dc1d2588e4253bc400f4fbac89492
record_format Article
spelling doaj-218dc1d2588e4253bc400f4fbac894922021-09-25T23:43:21ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-09-01121154115410.3390/atmos12091154Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic TechniquesRenata Graf0Pouya Aghelpour1Department of Hydrology and Water Management, Institute of Physical Geography and Environmental Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-680 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan 65178-38695, IranThe temperature of river water (TRW) is an important factor in river ecosystem predictions. This study aims to compare two different types of numerical model for predicting daily TRW in the Warta River basin in Poland. The implemented models were of the stochastic type—Autoregressive (AR), Moving Average (MA), Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)—and the artificial intelligence (AI) type—Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Radial Basis Function (RBF) and Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH). The ANFIS and RBF models had the most fitted outputs and the AR, ARMA and ARIMA patterns were the most accurate ones. The results showed that both of the model types can significantly present suitable predictions. The stochastic models have somewhat less error with respect to both the highest and lowest TRW deciles than the AIs and were found to be better for prediction studies, with the GMDH complex model in some cases reaching Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.619 °C and Nash-Sutcliff coefficient (NS) = 0.992, while the AR(2) simple linear model with just two inputs was partially able to achieve better results (RMSE = 0.606 °C and NS = 0.994). Due to these promising outcomes, it is suggested that this work be extended to other catchment areas to extend and generalize the results.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/9/1154river water temperatureneural networkstochastic modelinggroup method of data handlingtime series predictionpolish river basin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renata Graf
Pouya Aghelpour
spellingShingle Renata Graf
Pouya Aghelpour
Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques
Atmosphere
river water temperature
neural network
stochastic modeling
group method of data handling
time series prediction
polish river basin
author_facet Renata Graf
Pouya Aghelpour
author_sort Renata Graf
title Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques
title_short Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques
title_full Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques
title_fullStr Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Daily River Water Temperature Prediction: A Comparison between Neural Network and Stochastic Techniques
title_sort daily river water temperature prediction: a comparison between neural network and stochastic techniques
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The temperature of river water (TRW) is an important factor in river ecosystem predictions. This study aims to compare two different types of numerical model for predicting daily TRW in the Warta River basin in Poland. The implemented models were of the stochastic type—Autoregressive (AR), Moving Average (MA), Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)—and the artificial intelligence (AI) type—Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Radial Basis Function (RBF) and Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH). The ANFIS and RBF models had the most fitted outputs and the AR, ARMA and ARIMA patterns were the most accurate ones. The results showed that both of the model types can significantly present suitable predictions. The stochastic models have somewhat less error with respect to both the highest and lowest TRW deciles than the AIs and were found to be better for prediction studies, with the GMDH complex model in some cases reaching Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.619 °C and Nash-Sutcliff coefficient (NS) = 0.992, while the AR(2) simple linear model with just two inputs was partially able to achieve better results (RMSE = 0.606 °C and NS = 0.994). Due to these promising outcomes, it is suggested that this work be extended to other catchment areas to extend and generalize the results.
topic river water temperature
neural network
stochastic modeling
group method of data handling
time series prediction
polish river basin
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/9/1154
work_keys_str_mv AT renatagraf dailyriverwatertemperaturepredictionacomparisonbetweenneuralnetworkandstochastictechniques
AT pouyaaghelpour dailyriverwatertemperaturepredictionacomparisonbetweenneuralnetworkandstochastictechniques
_version_ 1717368167801552896