What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Both the acoustic variability of a distractor sequence and the degree to which it violates expectations are important determinants of auditory distraction. In four experiments we examined the relative contribution of local auditory changes on the one hand and expectation violations on the other hand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan P Röer, Raoul Bell, Axel Buchner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3882218?pdf=render
id doaj-217a8f7fa31e4286a4eea3acf98a9d21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-217a8f7fa31e4286a4eea3acf98a9d212020-11-25T00:40:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8416610.1371/journal.pone.0084166What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.Jan P RöerRaoul BellAxel BuchnerBoth the acoustic variability of a distractor sequence and the degree to which it violates expectations are important determinants of auditory distraction. In four experiments we examined the relative contribution of local auditory changes on the one hand and expectation violations on the other hand in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant sound. We present evidence for a greater disruption by auditory sequences ending in unexpected steady state distractor repetitions compared to auditory sequences with expected changing state endings even though the former contained fewer local changes. This effect was demonstrated with piano melodies (Experiment 1) and speech distractors (Experiment 2). Furthermore, it was replicated when the expectation violation occurred after the encoding of the target items (Experiment 3), indicating that the items' maintenance in short-term memory was disrupted by attentional capture and not their encoding. This seems to be primarily due to the violation of a model of the specific auditory distractor sequences because the effect vanishes and even reverses when the experiment provides no opportunity to build up a specific neural model about the distractor sequence (Experiment 4). Nevertheless, the violation of abstract long-term knowledge about auditory regularities seems to cause a small and transient capture effect: Disruption decreased markedly over the course of the experiments indicating that participants habituated to the unexpected distractor repetitions across trials. The overall pattern of results adds to the growing literature that the degree to which auditory distractors violate situation-specific expectations is a more important determinant of auditory distraction than the degree to which a distractor sequence contains local auditory changes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3882218?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan P Röer
Raoul Bell
Axel Buchner
spellingShingle Jan P Röer
Raoul Bell
Axel Buchner
What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jan P Röer
Raoul Bell
Axel Buchner
author_sort Jan P Röer
title What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
title_short What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
title_full What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
title_fullStr What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
title_full_unstemmed What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
title_sort what determines auditory distraction? on the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Both the acoustic variability of a distractor sequence and the degree to which it violates expectations are important determinants of auditory distraction. In four experiments we examined the relative contribution of local auditory changes on the one hand and expectation violations on the other hand in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant sound. We present evidence for a greater disruption by auditory sequences ending in unexpected steady state distractor repetitions compared to auditory sequences with expected changing state endings even though the former contained fewer local changes. This effect was demonstrated with piano melodies (Experiment 1) and speech distractors (Experiment 2). Furthermore, it was replicated when the expectation violation occurred after the encoding of the target items (Experiment 3), indicating that the items' maintenance in short-term memory was disrupted by attentional capture and not their encoding. This seems to be primarily due to the violation of a model of the specific auditory distractor sequences because the effect vanishes and even reverses when the experiment provides no opportunity to build up a specific neural model about the distractor sequence (Experiment 4). Nevertheless, the violation of abstract long-term knowledge about auditory regularities seems to cause a small and transient capture effect: Disruption decreased markedly over the course of the experiments indicating that participants habituated to the unexpected distractor repetitions across trials. The overall pattern of results adds to the growing literature that the degree to which auditory distractors violate situation-specific expectations is a more important determinant of auditory distraction than the degree to which a distractor sequence contains local auditory changes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3882218?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT janproer whatdeterminesauditorydistractionontherolesoflocalauditorychangesandexpectationviolations
AT raoulbell whatdeterminesauditorydistractionontherolesoflocalauditorychangesandexpectationviolations
AT axelbuchner whatdeterminesauditorydistractionontherolesoflocalauditorychangesandexpectationviolations
_version_ 1725289279363481600