What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
Both the acoustic variability of a distractor sequence and the degree to which it violates expectations are important determinants of auditory distraction. In four experiments we examined the relative contribution of local auditory changes on the one hand and expectation violations on the other hand...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3882218?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-217a8f7fa31e4286a4eea3acf98a9d21 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-217a8f7fa31e4286a4eea3acf98a9d212020-11-25T00:40:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8416610.1371/journal.pone.0084166What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.Jan P RöerRaoul BellAxel BuchnerBoth the acoustic variability of a distractor sequence and the degree to which it violates expectations are important determinants of auditory distraction. In four experiments we examined the relative contribution of local auditory changes on the one hand and expectation violations on the other hand in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant sound. We present evidence for a greater disruption by auditory sequences ending in unexpected steady state distractor repetitions compared to auditory sequences with expected changing state endings even though the former contained fewer local changes. This effect was demonstrated with piano melodies (Experiment 1) and speech distractors (Experiment 2). Furthermore, it was replicated when the expectation violation occurred after the encoding of the target items (Experiment 3), indicating that the items' maintenance in short-term memory was disrupted by attentional capture and not their encoding. This seems to be primarily due to the violation of a model of the specific auditory distractor sequences because the effect vanishes and even reverses when the experiment provides no opportunity to build up a specific neural model about the distractor sequence (Experiment 4). Nevertheless, the violation of abstract long-term knowledge about auditory regularities seems to cause a small and transient capture effect: Disruption decreased markedly over the course of the experiments indicating that participants habituated to the unexpected distractor repetitions across trials. The overall pattern of results adds to the growing literature that the degree to which auditory distractors violate situation-specific expectations is a more important determinant of auditory distraction than the degree to which a distractor sequence contains local auditory changes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3882218?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jan P Röer Raoul Bell Axel Buchner |
spellingShingle |
Jan P Röer Raoul Bell Axel Buchner What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jan P Röer Raoul Bell Axel Buchner |
author_sort |
Jan P Röer |
title |
What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. |
title_short |
What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. |
title_full |
What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. |
title_fullStr |
What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. |
title_full_unstemmed |
What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. |
title_sort |
what determines auditory distraction? on the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Both the acoustic variability of a distractor sequence and the degree to which it violates expectations are important determinants of auditory distraction. In four experiments we examined the relative contribution of local auditory changes on the one hand and expectation violations on the other hand in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant sound. We present evidence for a greater disruption by auditory sequences ending in unexpected steady state distractor repetitions compared to auditory sequences with expected changing state endings even though the former contained fewer local changes. This effect was demonstrated with piano melodies (Experiment 1) and speech distractors (Experiment 2). Furthermore, it was replicated when the expectation violation occurred after the encoding of the target items (Experiment 3), indicating that the items' maintenance in short-term memory was disrupted by attentional capture and not their encoding. This seems to be primarily due to the violation of a model of the specific auditory distractor sequences because the effect vanishes and even reverses when the experiment provides no opportunity to build up a specific neural model about the distractor sequence (Experiment 4). Nevertheless, the violation of abstract long-term knowledge about auditory regularities seems to cause a small and transient capture effect: Disruption decreased markedly over the course of the experiments indicating that participants habituated to the unexpected distractor repetitions across trials. The overall pattern of results adds to the growing literature that the degree to which auditory distractors violate situation-specific expectations is a more important determinant of auditory distraction than the degree to which a distractor sequence contains local auditory changes. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3882218?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janproer whatdeterminesauditorydistractionontherolesoflocalauditorychangesandexpectationviolations AT raoulbell whatdeterminesauditorydistractionontherolesoflocalauditorychangesandexpectationviolations AT axelbuchner whatdeterminesauditorydistractionontherolesoflocalauditorychangesandexpectationviolations |
_version_ |
1725289279363481600 |