‘The New Order of Things’: Immobility as protection in the regime of immigration controls
In this paper, I discuss two 1835 ordinances passed by the local council of the British colony of Mauritius. Passed shortly after Britain’s 1833 Slavery Abolition Act, these restrictions initiated the regulation and restriction of immigration within the British Empire. Seen as quite novel in their d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Anti-Trafficking Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/262 |
| Summary: | In this paper, I discuss two 1835 ordinances passed by the local council of the British colony of Mauritius. Passed shortly after Britain’s 1833 Slavery Abolition Act, these restrictions initiated the regulation and restriction of immigration within the British Empire. Seen as quite novel in their day, these ordinances employed the rhetoric of ‘protecting emigrants’ to legitimise the new constraints they imposed on free human mobility. Today, when the national ‘logic of constraint’ on human mobility is almost uncontested, the idea that immigration controls protect migrants remains central to the discursive practices concerning human trafficking. Nation-state constraints on human mobility are normalised while the exploitation and abuse of people on the move is ideologically redirected to ‘modern-day slavers’ or ‘evil traffickers’, thus absolving both the state and globally operative capital of their culpability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2286-7511 2287-0113 |