Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells

The genotyping of genetically-modified cells is a crucial step in studies of transgenics and genomic editing with systems such as CRISPR/Cas. The detection of genome editing events can be directly related to the genotyping methodology used, which is influenced by its costs, since many experiments re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louhanna Pinheiro Rodrigues Teixeira, Francisco Eder de Moura Lopes, André Saraiva Leão Marcelo Antunes, Matheus Soares Alves, André Marrocos Miranda, Saul Gaudencio Neto, Leonardo Tondello Martins, Ana Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro Moreira, Kaio Cesar Simiano Tavares, René Massimiliano Marsano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500585/?tool=EBI
id doaj-2165989e2e214e21b56d9cb276137611
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2165989e2e214e21b56d9cb2761376112020-11-25T02:45:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cellsLouhanna Pinheiro Rodrigues TeixeiraFrancisco Eder de Moura LopesAndré Saraiva Leão Marcelo AntunesMatheus Soares AlvesAndré Marrocos MirandaSaul Gaudencio NetoLeonardo Tondello MartinsAna Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro MoreiraKaio Cesar Simiano TavaresRené Massimiliano MarsanoThe genotyping of genetically-modified cells is a crucial step in studies of transgenics and genomic editing with systems such as CRISPR/Cas. The detection of genome editing events can be directly related to the genotyping methodology used, which is influenced by its costs, since many experiments require the analysis of a large number of samples. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of direct lysis methods of genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction for the detection of knockins and knockouts in primary goat cells. Initially, three gDNA extraction protocols (protocol A, heat denaturation/freeze-thaw in water; protocol B, heat denaturation/proteinase K; and protocol C, CellsDirect Kit) were tested using different quantities (1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 cells) and types of goat primary cells (fibroblasts and goat mammary epithelial cells—GMECs) for subsequent validation by PCR amplification of small (GAPDH) and large amplicons (hLF transgene). All protocols were successful in the detection of the small amplicon; however, in GMECs, only protocol B resulted efficient amplification (protocol A—0%, protocol B—93%, protocol C—13.33%, P <0.05). In a proof-of-principle experiment, the TP53 gene was knocked out in GMECs by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion while constructs containing the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (pBC-anti-VEGF) and bacterial L-Asparaginase (pBC-ASNase) transgenes were knocked-in separately in fibroblasts. Detection of successful editing was performed using protocol B and PCR. The integration rates of the pBC-ASNase and pBC-anti-VEGF transgenes were 93.6% and 72%, respectively, as per PCR. The efficiency of biallelic editing in GMECs using CRISPR/Cas9 for the TP53 deletion was 5.4%. Our results suggest that protocol B (heat denaturation/proteinase K) can be used as an inexpensive and quick methodology for detecting genetic modifications in different types of primary goat cells, with efficiency rates consistent with values previously described in the literature when using extraction kits or more complex proteinase K formulations.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500585/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louhanna Pinheiro Rodrigues Teixeira
Francisco Eder de Moura Lopes
André Saraiva Leão Marcelo Antunes
Matheus Soares Alves
André Marrocos Miranda
Saul Gaudencio Neto
Leonardo Tondello Martins
Ana Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro Moreira
Kaio Cesar Simiano Tavares
René Massimiliano Marsano
spellingShingle Louhanna Pinheiro Rodrigues Teixeira
Francisco Eder de Moura Lopes
André Saraiva Leão Marcelo Antunes
Matheus Soares Alves
André Marrocos Miranda
Saul Gaudencio Neto
Leonardo Tondello Martins
Ana Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro Moreira
Kaio Cesar Simiano Tavares
René Massimiliano Marsano
Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
PLoS ONE
author_facet Louhanna Pinheiro Rodrigues Teixeira
Francisco Eder de Moura Lopes
André Saraiva Leão Marcelo Antunes
Matheus Soares Alves
André Marrocos Miranda
Saul Gaudencio Neto
Leonardo Tondello Martins
Ana Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro Moreira
Kaio Cesar Simiano Tavares
René Massimiliano Marsano
author_sort Louhanna Pinheiro Rodrigues Teixeira
title Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
title_short Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
title_full Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
title_fullStr Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
title_full_unstemmed Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
title_sort application of a cost-effective dna extraction protocol for screening transgenic and crispr-edited primary goat cells
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The genotyping of genetically-modified cells is a crucial step in studies of transgenics and genomic editing with systems such as CRISPR/Cas. The detection of genome editing events can be directly related to the genotyping methodology used, which is influenced by its costs, since many experiments require the analysis of a large number of samples. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of direct lysis methods of genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction for the detection of knockins and knockouts in primary goat cells. Initially, three gDNA extraction protocols (protocol A, heat denaturation/freeze-thaw in water; protocol B, heat denaturation/proteinase K; and protocol C, CellsDirect Kit) were tested using different quantities (1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 cells) and types of goat primary cells (fibroblasts and goat mammary epithelial cells—GMECs) for subsequent validation by PCR amplification of small (GAPDH) and large amplicons (hLF transgene). All protocols were successful in the detection of the small amplicon; however, in GMECs, only protocol B resulted efficient amplification (protocol A—0%, protocol B—93%, protocol C—13.33%, P <0.05). In a proof-of-principle experiment, the TP53 gene was knocked out in GMECs by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion while constructs containing the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (pBC-anti-VEGF) and bacterial L-Asparaginase (pBC-ASNase) transgenes were knocked-in separately in fibroblasts. Detection of successful editing was performed using protocol B and PCR. The integration rates of the pBC-ASNase and pBC-anti-VEGF transgenes were 93.6% and 72%, respectively, as per PCR. The efficiency of biallelic editing in GMECs using CRISPR/Cas9 for the TP53 deletion was 5.4%. Our results suggest that protocol B (heat denaturation/proteinase K) can be used as an inexpensive and quick methodology for detecting genetic modifications in different types of primary goat cells, with efficiency rates consistent with values previously described in the literature when using extraction kits or more complex proteinase K formulations.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500585/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT louhannapinheirorodriguesteixeira applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT franciscoederdemouralopes applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT andresaraivaleaomarceloantunes applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT matheussoaresalves applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT andremarrocosmiranda applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT saulgaudencioneto applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT leonardotondellomartins applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT anacristinadeoliveiramonteiromoreira applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT kaiocesarsimianotavares applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
AT renemassimilianomarsano applicationofacosteffectivednaextractionprotocolforscreeningtransgenicandcrispreditedprimarygoatcells
_version_ 1724763284025901056