A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery

A comparative study of water indices and image classification algorithms for mapping inland water bodies using Landsat imagery was carried out through obtaining 24 high-resolution (≤5 m) and cloud-free images archived in Google Earth with the same (or ±1 day) acquisition dates as the Landsat-8 OLI i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feifei Pan, Xiaohuan Xi, Cheng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/10/1611
id doaj-215d276401c04aa3a88c8a12022e89bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-215d276401c04aa3a88c8a12022e89bb2020-11-25T03:26:05ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-05-01121611161110.3390/rs12101611A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat ImageryFeifei Pan0Xiaohuan Xi1Cheng Wang2Department of Geography and the Environment, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USAKey Laboratory of Digital Earth, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, ChinaKey Laboratory of Digital Earth, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, ChinaA comparative study of water indices and image classification algorithms for mapping inland water bodies using Landsat imagery was carried out through obtaining 24 high-resolution (≤5 m) and cloud-free images archived in Google Earth with the same (or ±1 day) acquisition dates as the Landsat-8 OLI images over 24 selected lakes across the globe, and developing a method to generate the alternate ground truth data from the Google Earth images for properly evaluating the Landsat image classification results. In addition to the commonly used green band-based water indices, Landsat-8 OLI’s ultra-blue, blue, and red band-based water indices were also tested in this research. Two unsupervised (the zero-water index threshold H0 method and Otsu’s automatic threshold selection method) and one supervised (the <i>k</i>-nearest neighbor (KNN) method) image classification algorithms were employed for conducting the image classification. Through comparing a total of 2880 Landsat image classification results with the alternate ground truth data, this study showed that (1) it is not necessary to use some supervised image classification methods for extracting water bodies from Landsat imagery given the high computational cost associated with the supervised image classification algorithms; (2) the unsupervised classification algorithms such as the H0 and Otsu methods could achieve comparable accuracy as the KNN method, although the H0 method produced more large error outliers than the Otsu method, thus the Otsu method is better than the H0 method; and (3) the ultra-blue band-based AWEI<sub>nsuB</sub> is the best water index for the H0 method, and the ultra-blue band-based MNDWI<sub>2uB</sub> is the best water index for both the Otsu and KNN methods.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/10/1611LandsatGoogle Earthwater indexunsupervised image classificationsupervised image classificationrelative error
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Feifei Pan
Xiaohuan Xi
Cheng Wang
spellingShingle Feifei Pan
Xiaohuan Xi
Cheng Wang
A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery
Remote Sensing
Landsat
Google Earth
water index
unsupervised image classification
supervised image classification
relative error
author_facet Feifei Pan
Xiaohuan Xi
Cheng Wang
author_sort Feifei Pan
title A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery
title_short A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery
title_full A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Water Indices and Image Classification Algorithms for Mapping Inland Surface Water Bodies Using Landsat Imagery
title_sort comparative study of water indices and image classification algorithms for mapping inland surface water bodies using landsat imagery
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2020-05-01
description A comparative study of water indices and image classification algorithms for mapping inland water bodies using Landsat imagery was carried out through obtaining 24 high-resolution (≤5 m) and cloud-free images archived in Google Earth with the same (or ±1 day) acquisition dates as the Landsat-8 OLI images over 24 selected lakes across the globe, and developing a method to generate the alternate ground truth data from the Google Earth images for properly evaluating the Landsat image classification results. In addition to the commonly used green band-based water indices, Landsat-8 OLI’s ultra-blue, blue, and red band-based water indices were also tested in this research. Two unsupervised (the zero-water index threshold H0 method and Otsu’s automatic threshold selection method) and one supervised (the <i>k</i>-nearest neighbor (KNN) method) image classification algorithms were employed for conducting the image classification. Through comparing a total of 2880 Landsat image classification results with the alternate ground truth data, this study showed that (1) it is not necessary to use some supervised image classification methods for extracting water bodies from Landsat imagery given the high computational cost associated with the supervised image classification algorithms; (2) the unsupervised classification algorithms such as the H0 and Otsu methods could achieve comparable accuracy as the KNN method, although the H0 method produced more large error outliers than the Otsu method, thus the Otsu method is better than the H0 method; and (3) the ultra-blue band-based AWEI<sub>nsuB</sub> is the best water index for the H0 method, and the ultra-blue band-based MNDWI<sub>2uB</sub> is the best water index for both the Otsu and KNN methods.
topic Landsat
Google Earth
water index
unsupervised image classification
supervised image classification
relative error
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/10/1611
work_keys_str_mv AT feifeipan acomparativestudyofwaterindicesandimageclassificationalgorithmsformappinginlandsurfacewaterbodiesusinglandsatimagery
AT xiaohuanxi acomparativestudyofwaterindicesandimageclassificationalgorithmsformappinginlandsurfacewaterbodiesusinglandsatimagery
AT chengwang acomparativestudyofwaterindicesandimageclassificationalgorithmsformappinginlandsurfacewaterbodiesusinglandsatimagery
AT feifeipan comparativestudyofwaterindicesandimageclassificationalgorithmsformappinginlandsurfacewaterbodiesusinglandsatimagery
AT xiaohuanxi comparativestudyofwaterindicesandimageclassificationalgorithmsformappinginlandsurfacewaterbodiesusinglandsatimagery
AT chengwang comparativestudyofwaterindicesandimageclassificationalgorithmsformappinginlandsurfacewaterbodiesusinglandsatimagery
_version_ 1724594074770472960