Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses

Summary: Background: As a policy option to reduce consumption of alcohol and the harm it does, on May 1, 2018, Scotland introduced a minimum price of 50 British pence (p) per unit of alcohol (8 g) sold; Wales followed suit on March 2, 2020, with the same minimum unit price (MUP). We analysed househ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Anderson, ProfMD, Amy O'Donnell, PhD, Eileen Kaner, ProfPhD, Eva Jané Llopis, PhD, Jakob Manthey, PhD, Jürgen Rehm, ProfPhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:The Lancet Public Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266721000529
id doaj-215bcddb3a9543838668adcfb630435f
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Anderson, ProfMD
Amy O'Donnell, PhD
Eileen Kaner, ProfPhD
Eva Jané Llopis, PhD
Jakob Manthey, PhD
Jürgen Rehm, ProfPhD
spellingShingle Peter Anderson, ProfMD
Amy O'Donnell, PhD
Eileen Kaner, ProfPhD
Eva Jané Llopis, PhD
Jakob Manthey, PhD
Jürgen Rehm, ProfPhD
Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
The Lancet Public Health
author_facet Peter Anderson, ProfMD
Amy O'Donnell, PhD
Eileen Kaner, ProfPhD
Eva Jané Llopis, PhD
Jakob Manthey, PhD
Jürgen Rehm, ProfPhD
author_sort Peter Anderson, ProfMD
title Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
title_short Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
title_full Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
title_fullStr Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
title_full_unstemmed Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
title_sort impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in scotland and wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
publisher Elsevier
series The Lancet Public Health
issn 2468-2667
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Summary: Background: As a policy option to reduce consumption of alcohol and the harm it does, on May 1, 2018, Scotland introduced a minimum price of 50 British pence (p) per unit of alcohol (8 g) sold; Wales followed suit on March 2, 2020, with the same minimum unit price (MUP). We analysed household purchase data based on bar codes to assess the impact of these policy options in the medium term for Scotland and in the immediate term for Wales. Methods: For these location-controlled, interrupted time series regression analyses, the data source was Kantar WorldPanel's household shopping panel, which, at the time of our analysis, included 35 242 British households providing detailed information on 1·24 million separate alcohol purchases in 2015–18 and the first half of 2020. With no data exclusions, we analysed the impact of introducing MUP in Scotland, using purchases in northern England as control, and in Wales, using western England as control. The studied changes associated with MUP were price paid per gram of alcohol purchased, grams of alcohol purchased, and amount of money spent on alcohol. Findings: In Scotland, price increases and purchase decreases following the introduction of MUP in 2018 were maintained during the first half of 2020. The difference between Scotland and northern England in 2020 was a price increase of 0·741 p per gram (95% CI 0·724–0·759), a 7·6% increase, and a purchase decrease of 7·063 g per adult per household per day that an alcohol purchase was made (6·656–7·470), a 7·7% decrease. In Wales, the introduction of MUP led to similar results. The difference between Wales and western England was a price increase 0·841 of 0·841 p per gram (0·732–0·951), an 8·2% increase, and a purchase decrease of 7·052 g per adult per household per day that an alcohol purchase was made (6·463–7·640), an 8·6% decrease. For both Scotland and Wales, reductions in overall purchases of alcohol were largely restricted to households that bought the most alcohol. The introduction of MUP was not associated with an increased expenditure on alcohol by households that generally bought small amounts of alcohol and, in particular, those with low incomes. The changes were not affected by the introduction of COVID-19 confinement in the UK on March 26, 2020. Interpretation: The evidence base supporting the positive, targeted impact of MUP is strengthened by the comparable results for Scotland and Wales. The short-term impact of MUP in Scotland during 2018 is maintained during the first half of 2020. MUP is an effective alcohol policy option to reduce off-trade purchases of alcohol and should be widely considered. Funding: None.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266721000529
work_keys_str_mv AT peterandersonprofmd impactofminimumunitpricingonalcoholpurchasesinscotlandandwalescontrolledinterruptedtimeseriesanalyses
AT amyodonnellphd impactofminimumunitpricingonalcoholpurchasesinscotlandandwalescontrolledinterruptedtimeseriesanalyses
AT eileenkanerprofphd impactofminimumunitpricingonalcoholpurchasesinscotlandandwalescontrolledinterruptedtimeseriesanalyses
AT evajanellopisphd impactofminimumunitpricingonalcoholpurchasesinscotlandandwalescontrolledinterruptedtimeseriesanalyses
AT jakobmantheyphd impactofminimumunitpricingonalcoholpurchasesinscotlandandwalescontrolledinterruptedtimeseriesanalyses
AT jurgenrehmprofphd impactofminimumunitpricingonalcoholpurchasesinscotlandandwalescontrolledinterruptedtimeseriesanalyses
_version_ 1721246906244399104
spelling doaj-215bcddb3a9543838668adcfb630435f2021-07-31T04:40:29ZengElsevierThe Lancet Public Health2468-26672021-08-0168e557e565Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analysesPeter Anderson, ProfMD0Amy O'Donnell, PhD1Eileen Kaner, ProfPhD2Eva Jané Llopis, PhD3Jakob Manthey, PhD4Jürgen Rehm, ProfPhD5Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Correspondence to: Prof Peter Anderson, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UKPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, SpainInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Medical Science, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; I M Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian FederationSummary: Background: As a policy option to reduce consumption of alcohol and the harm it does, on May 1, 2018, Scotland introduced a minimum price of 50 British pence (p) per unit of alcohol (8 g) sold; Wales followed suit on March 2, 2020, with the same minimum unit price (MUP). We analysed household purchase data based on bar codes to assess the impact of these policy options in the medium term for Scotland and in the immediate term for Wales. Methods: For these location-controlled, interrupted time series regression analyses, the data source was Kantar WorldPanel's household shopping panel, which, at the time of our analysis, included 35 242 British households providing detailed information on 1·24 million separate alcohol purchases in 2015–18 and the first half of 2020. With no data exclusions, we analysed the impact of introducing MUP in Scotland, using purchases in northern England as control, and in Wales, using western England as control. The studied changes associated with MUP were price paid per gram of alcohol purchased, grams of alcohol purchased, and amount of money spent on alcohol. Findings: In Scotland, price increases and purchase decreases following the introduction of MUP in 2018 were maintained during the first half of 2020. The difference between Scotland and northern England in 2020 was a price increase of 0·741 p per gram (95% CI 0·724–0·759), a 7·6% increase, and a purchase decrease of 7·063 g per adult per household per day that an alcohol purchase was made (6·656–7·470), a 7·7% decrease. In Wales, the introduction of MUP led to similar results. The difference between Wales and western England was a price increase 0·841 of 0·841 p per gram (0·732–0·951), an 8·2% increase, and a purchase decrease of 7·052 g per adult per household per day that an alcohol purchase was made (6·463–7·640), an 8·6% decrease. For both Scotland and Wales, reductions in overall purchases of alcohol were largely restricted to households that bought the most alcohol. The introduction of MUP was not associated with an increased expenditure on alcohol by households that generally bought small amounts of alcohol and, in particular, those with low incomes. The changes were not affected by the introduction of COVID-19 confinement in the UK on March 26, 2020. Interpretation: The evidence base supporting the positive, targeted impact of MUP is strengthened by the comparable results for Scotland and Wales. The short-term impact of MUP in Scotland during 2018 is maintained during the first half of 2020. MUP is an effective alcohol policy option to reduce off-trade purchases of alcohol and should be widely considered. Funding: None.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266721000529