Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.

Certain brain areas involved in interval timing are also important in motor activity. This raises the possibility that motor activity might influence interval timing. To test this hypothesis, we assessed interval timing in healthy adults following different types of training. The pre- and post-train...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lilian Fautrelle, Denis Mareschal, Robert French, Caspar Addyman, Elizabeth Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119187
id doaj-2154530b7f574272bef3a154c40d138b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2154530b7f574272bef3a154c40d138b2021-03-03T20:07:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011918710.1371/journal.pone.0119187Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.Lilian FautrelleDenis MareschalRobert FrenchCaspar AddymanElizabeth ThomasCertain brain areas involved in interval timing are also important in motor activity. This raises the possibility that motor activity might influence interval timing. To test this hypothesis, we assessed interval timing in healthy adults following different types of training. The pre- and post-training tasks consisted of a button press in response to the presentation of a rhythmic visual stimulus. Alterations in temporal expectancy were evaluated by measuring response times. Training consisted of responding to the visual presentation of regularly appearing stimuli by either: (1) pointing with a whole-body movement, (2) pointing only with the arm, (3) imagining pointing with a whole-body movement, (4) simply watching the stimulus presentation, (5) pointing with a whole-body movement in response to a target that appeared at irregular intervals (6) reading a newspaper. Participants performing a motor activity in response to the regular target showed significant improvements in judgment times compared to individuals with no associated motor activity. Individuals who only imagined pointing with a whole-body movement also showed significant improvements. No improvements were observed in the group that trained with a motor response to an irregular stimulus, hence eliminating the explanation that the improved temporal expectations of the other motor training groups was purely due to an improved motor capacity to press the response button. All groups performed a secondary task equally well, hence indicating that our results could not simply be attributed to differences in attention between the groups. Our results show that motor activity, even when it does not play a causal or corrective role, can lead to improved interval timing judgments.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119187
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lilian Fautrelle
Denis Mareschal
Robert French
Caspar Addyman
Elizabeth Thomas
spellingShingle Lilian Fautrelle
Denis Mareschal
Robert French
Caspar Addyman
Elizabeth Thomas
Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lilian Fautrelle
Denis Mareschal
Robert French
Caspar Addyman
Elizabeth Thomas
author_sort Lilian Fautrelle
title Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
title_short Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
title_full Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
title_fullStr Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
title_full_unstemmed Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
title_sort motor activity improves temporal expectancy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Certain brain areas involved in interval timing are also important in motor activity. This raises the possibility that motor activity might influence interval timing. To test this hypothesis, we assessed interval timing in healthy adults following different types of training. The pre- and post-training tasks consisted of a button press in response to the presentation of a rhythmic visual stimulus. Alterations in temporal expectancy were evaluated by measuring response times. Training consisted of responding to the visual presentation of regularly appearing stimuli by either: (1) pointing with a whole-body movement, (2) pointing only with the arm, (3) imagining pointing with a whole-body movement, (4) simply watching the stimulus presentation, (5) pointing with a whole-body movement in response to a target that appeared at irregular intervals (6) reading a newspaper. Participants performing a motor activity in response to the regular target showed significant improvements in judgment times compared to individuals with no associated motor activity. Individuals who only imagined pointing with a whole-body movement also showed significant improvements. No improvements were observed in the group that trained with a motor response to an irregular stimulus, hence eliminating the explanation that the improved temporal expectations of the other motor training groups was purely due to an improved motor capacity to press the response button. All groups performed a secondary task equally well, hence indicating that our results could not simply be attributed to differences in attention between the groups. Our results show that motor activity, even when it does not play a causal or corrective role, can lead to improved interval timing judgments.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119187
work_keys_str_mv AT lilianfautrelle motoractivityimprovestemporalexpectancy
AT denismareschal motoractivityimprovestemporalexpectancy
AT robertfrench motoractivityimprovestemporalexpectancy
AT casparaddyman motoractivityimprovestemporalexpectancy
AT elizabeththomas motoractivityimprovestemporalexpectancy
_version_ 1714823929414025216