Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil

In the present study, unconfined compressive strength (qu) values of two lime-treated soils (soil 1 and 2) with curing times of 28 d, 90 d and 360 d were optimized. The influence of void/lime ratio was represented by the porosity/volumetric lime content ratio (η/Liv) as the main parameter. η/Liv rep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo, Eclesielter Batista Moreira, Juliana Lundgren Rose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-08-01
Series:Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775518302932
id doaj-214ade943d65435abdd08fedefd3588a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-214ade943d65435abdd08fedefd3588a2020-11-24T21:26:48ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552019-08-01114882891Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soilJair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino0Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo1Eclesielter Batista Moreira2Juliana Lundgren Rose3Department of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilCorresponding author.; Department of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilDepartment of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilDepartment of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilIn the present study, unconfined compressive strength (qu) values of two lime-treated soils (soil 1 and 2) with curing times of 28 d, 90 d and 360 d were optimized. The influence of void/lime ratio was represented by the porosity/volumetric lime content ratio (η/Liv) as the main parameter. η/Liv represents the volume of void influenced by compaction effort and lime volume. The evolution of qu was analyzed for each soil using the coefficient of determination as the optimization parameter. Aiming at providing adjustments to the mechanical resistance values, the η/Liv parameter was modified to η/LivC using the adjustment exponent C (to make qu-η/Liv variation rates compatible). The results show that with the decrease of η/LivC, qu increases potentially and the optimized values of C were 0.14–0.18. The mechanical resistance data show similar trends between qu and η/LivC for the studied silty soil-ground lime mixtures, which were cured at ambient temperature (23 ± 2) °C with different curing times of 28–360 d. Finally, optimized equations were presented using the normalized strengths and the proposed optimization model, which show 6% error and 95% acceptability on average. Keywords: Lime-treated soil, Void/lime ratio, Ground improvementhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775518302932
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino
Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo
Eclesielter Batista Moreira
Juliana Lundgren Rose
spellingShingle Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino
Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo
Eclesielter Batista Moreira
Juliana Lundgren Rose
Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
author_facet Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino
Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo
Eclesielter Batista Moreira
Juliana Lundgren Rose
author_sort Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino
title Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
title_short Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
title_full Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
title_fullStr Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
title_sort optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
issn 1674-7755
publishDate 2019-08-01
description In the present study, unconfined compressive strength (qu) values of two lime-treated soils (soil 1 and 2) with curing times of 28 d, 90 d and 360 d were optimized. The influence of void/lime ratio was represented by the porosity/volumetric lime content ratio (η/Liv) as the main parameter. η/Liv represents the volume of void influenced by compaction effort and lime volume. The evolution of qu was analyzed for each soil using the coefficient of determination as the optimization parameter. Aiming at providing adjustments to the mechanical resistance values, the η/Liv parameter was modified to η/LivC using the adjustment exponent C (to make qu-η/Liv variation rates compatible). The results show that with the decrease of η/LivC, qu increases potentially and the optimized values of C were 0.14–0.18. The mechanical resistance data show similar trends between qu and η/LivC for the studied silty soil-ground lime mixtures, which were cured at ambient temperature (23 ± 2) °C with different curing times of 28–360 d. Finally, optimized equations were presented using the normalized strengths and the proposed optimization model, which show 6% error and 95% acceptability on average. Keywords: Lime-treated soil, Void/lime ratio, Ground improvement
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775518302932
work_keys_str_mv AT jairdejesusarrietabaldovino optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil
AT ronaldoluisdossantosizzo optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil
AT eclesielterbatistamoreira optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil
AT julianalundgrenrose optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil
_version_ 1725977498844397568