Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil
In the present study, unconfined compressive strength (qu) values of two lime-treated soils (soil 1 and 2) with curing times of 28 d, 90 d and 360 d were optimized. The influence of void/lime ratio was represented by the porosity/volumetric lime content ratio (η/Liv) as the main parameter. η/Liv rep...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775518302932 |
id |
doaj-214ade943d65435abdd08fedefd3588a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-214ade943d65435abdd08fedefd3588a2020-11-24T21:26:48ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552019-08-01114882891Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soilJair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino0Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo1Eclesielter Batista Moreira2Juliana Lundgren Rose3Department of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilCorresponding author.; Department of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilDepartment of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilDepartment of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Campus Curitiba, Curitiba, BrazilIn the present study, unconfined compressive strength (qu) values of two lime-treated soils (soil 1 and 2) with curing times of 28 d, 90 d and 360 d were optimized. The influence of void/lime ratio was represented by the porosity/volumetric lime content ratio (η/Liv) as the main parameter. η/Liv represents the volume of void influenced by compaction effort and lime volume. The evolution of qu was analyzed for each soil using the coefficient of determination as the optimization parameter. Aiming at providing adjustments to the mechanical resistance values, the η/Liv parameter was modified to η/LivC using the adjustment exponent C (to make qu-η/Liv variation rates compatible). The results show that with the decrease of η/LivC, qu increases potentially and the optimized values of C were 0.14–0.18. The mechanical resistance data show similar trends between qu and η/LivC for the studied silty soil-ground lime mixtures, which were cured at ambient temperature (23 ± 2) °C with different curing times of 28–360 d. Finally, optimized equations were presented using the normalized strengths and the proposed optimization model, which show 6% error and 95% acceptability on average. Keywords: Lime-treated soil, Void/lime ratio, Ground improvementhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775518302932 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo Eclesielter Batista Moreira Juliana Lundgren Rose |
spellingShingle |
Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo Eclesielter Batista Moreira Juliana Lundgren Rose Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering |
author_facet |
Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo Eclesielter Batista Moreira Juliana Lundgren Rose |
author_sort |
Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino |
title |
Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil |
title_short |
Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil |
title_full |
Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil |
title_fullStr |
Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil |
title_sort |
optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering |
issn |
1674-7755 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
In the present study, unconfined compressive strength (qu) values of two lime-treated soils (soil 1 and 2) with curing times of 28 d, 90 d and 360 d were optimized. The influence of void/lime ratio was represented by the porosity/volumetric lime content ratio (η/Liv) as the main parameter. η/Liv represents the volume of void influenced by compaction effort and lime volume. The evolution of qu was analyzed for each soil using the coefficient of determination as the optimization parameter. Aiming at providing adjustments to the mechanical resistance values, the η/Liv parameter was modified to η/LivC using the adjustment exponent C (to make qu-η/Liv variation rates compatible). The results show that with the decrease of η/LivC, qu increases potentially and the optimized values of C were 0.14–0.18. The mechanical resistance data show similar trends between qu and η/LivC for the studied silty soil-ground lime mixtures, which were cured at ambient temperature (23 ± 2) °C with different curing times of 28–360 d. Finally, optimized equations were presented using the normalized strengths and the proposed optimization model, which show 6% error and 95% acceptability on average. Keywords: Lime-treated soil, Void/lime ratio, Ground improvement |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775518302932 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jairdejesusarrietabaldovino optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil AT ronaldoluisdossantosizzo optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil AT eclesielterbatistamoreira optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil AT julianalundgrenrose optimizingtheevolutionofstrengthforlimestabilizedrammedsoil |
_version_ |
1725977498844397568 |