On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small

In this essay, I make the case for choosing to examine small subsets of Big Data datasets—making big data small. Big Data allows us to produce summaries of human behavior at a scale never before possible. But in the push to produce these summaries, we risk losing sight of a secondary but equally imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brooke Foucault Welles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-07-01
Series:Big Data & Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714540613
id doaj-214ab913548d41b69ebbebfc253c3d18
record_format Article
spelling doaj-214ab913548d41b69ebbebfc253c3d182020-11-25T03:00:07ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172014-07-01110.1177/205395171454061310.1177_2053951714540613On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data smallBrooke Foucault WellesIn this essay, I make the case for choosing to examine small subsets of Big Data datasets—making big data small. Big Data allows us to produce summaries of human behavior at a scale never before possible. But in the push to produce these summaries, we risk losing sight of a secondary but equally important advantage of Big Data—the plentiful representation of minorities. Women, minorities and statistical outliers have historically been omitted from the scientific record, with problematic consequences. Big Data affords the opportunity to remedy those omissions. However, to do so, Big Data researchers must choose to examine very small subsets of otherwise large datasets. I encourage researchers to embrace an ethical, empirical and epistemological stance on Big Data that includes minorities and outliers as reference categories, rather than the exceptions to statistical norms.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714540613
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brooke Foucault Welles
spellingShingle Brooke Foucault Welles
On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small
Big Data & Society
author_facet Brooke Foucault Welles
author_sort Brooke Foucault Welles
title On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small
title_short On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small
title_full On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small
title_fullStr On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small
title_full_unstemmed On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small
title_sort on minorities and outliers: the case for making big data small
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Big Data & Society
issn 2053-9517
publishDate 2014-07-01
description In this essay, I make the case for choosing to examine small subsets of Big Data datasets—making big data small. Big Data allows us to produce summaries of human behavior at a scale never before possible. But in the push to produce these summaries, we risk losing sight of a secondary but equally important advantage of Big Data—the plentiful representation of minorities. Women, minorities and statistical outliers have historically been omitted from the scientific record, with problematic consequences. Big Data affords the opportunity to remedy those omissions. However, to do so, Big Data researchers must choose to examine very small subsets of otherwise large datasets. I encourage researchers to embrace an ethical, empirical and epistemological stance on Big Data that includes minorities and outliers as reference categories, rather than the exceptions to statistical norms.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714540613
work_keys_str_mv AT brookefoucaultwelles onminoritiesandoutliersthecaseformakingbigdatasmall
_version_ 1724699274514530304