The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties

Nitrogen (N) is very important for sugarcane yield improvement, but the excessive application of N fertilizer brings about N pollution and a cost increase. Through distinguishing the difference of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), we can reasonably apply N fertilizer according to the NUE characteristic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yingying Yang, Shiwu Gao, Yong Jiang, Zhaoli Lin, Jun Luo, Mingjie Li, Jinlong Guo, Yachun Su, Liping Xu, Youxiong Que
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00406/full
id doaj-212cd420e7f94fcbbd5845f0eb7d23e9
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yingying Yang
Yingying Yang
Shiwu Gao
Shiwu Gao
Yong Jiang
Zhaoli Lin
Zhaoli Lin
Jun Luo
Jun Luo
Mingjie Li
Jinlong Guo
Jinlong Guo
Yachun Su
Yachun Su
Liping Xu
Liping Xu
Youxiong Que
Youxiong Que
spellingShingle Yingying Yang
Yingying Yang
Shiwu Gao
Shiwu Gao
Yong Jiang
Zhaoli Lin
Zhaoli Lin
Jun Luo
Jun Luo
Mingjie Li
Jinlong Guo
Jinlong Guo
Yachun Su
Yachun Su
Liping Xu
Liping Xu
Youxiong Que
Youxiong Que
The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
Frontiers in Plant Science
sugarcane
variety
physiological
agronomic
indicators
nitrogen use efficiency
author_facet Yingying Yang
Yingying Yang
Shiwu Gao
Shiwu Gao
Yong Jiang
Zhaoli Lin
Zhaoli Lin
Jun Luo
Jun Luo
Mingjie Li
Jinlong Guo
Jinlong Guo
Yachun Su
Yachun Su
Liping Xu
Liping Xu
Youxiong Que
Youxiong Que
author_sort Yingying Yang
title The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
title_short The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
title_full The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
title_fullStr The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
title_full_unstemmed The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
title_sort physiological and agronomic responses to nitrogen dosage in different sugarcane varieties
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Nitrogen (N) is very important for sugarcane yield improvement, but the excessive application of N fertilizer brings about N pollution and a cost increase. Through distinguishing the difference of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), we can reasonably apply N fertilizer according to the NUE characteristics of sugarcane varieties, and thus reduce N loss and maintain high yield. The present study showed the pot experiment results of identifying NUE types of nine main sugarcane varieties in the main sugarcane producing areas of China under controlled conditions, and identified the key physiological and agronomic indictors which can help to determine the NUE types of sugarcane. The test clones were exposed to varying levels of N fertilizer and 15 parameters that are likely to impact NUE were measured. The key results are (1) Sugarcane variety ROC22 has the high plant dry weight (PDW) and NUE among nine varieties under different N rates, it can take advantages under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), and less N fertilizer can be applied properly in production. (2) Varieties of GT32 was good performing genotype for PDW and NUE under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), GT42 was more suitable for moderate N environment (450 kg/hm2 urea), while YT94-128 was at middle N and high N supply (450–675 kg/hm2 urea). (3) Late stage of shoot elongation is suitable for differentiating sugarcane clones for NUE. (4) Leaf glutamine synthetase activity is the most reliable predictor of NUE in sugarcane. The result of pot experiment is sufficient to differentiate clonal variation for NUE in sugarcane as it reflects field experimental results. This study can set up a basis for identification the NUE types of sugarcane varieties and the development of reasonable N fertilizer application.
topic sugarcane
variety
physiological
agronomic
indicators
nitrogen use efficiency
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00406/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yingyingyang thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yingyingyang thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT shiwugao thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT shiwugao thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yongjiang thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT zhaolilin thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT zhaolilin thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT junluo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT junluo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT mingjieli thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT jinlongguo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT jinlongguo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yachunsu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yachunsu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT lipingxu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT lipingxu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT youxiongque thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT youxiongque thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yingyingyang physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yingyingyang physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT shiwugao physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT shiwugao physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yongjiang physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT zhaolilin physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT zhaolilin physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT junluo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT junluo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT mingjieli physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT jinlongguo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT jinlongguo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yachunsu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT yachunsu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT lipingxu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT lipingxu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT youxiongque physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
AT youxiongque physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties
_version_ 1725915535733948416
spelling doaj-212cd420e7f94fcbbd5845f0eb7d23e92020-11-24T21:43:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2019-04-011010.3389/fpls.2019.00406417963The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane VarietiesYingying Yang0Yingying Yang1Shiwu Gao2Shiwu Gao3Yong Jiang4Zhaoli Lin5Zhaoli Lin6Jun Luo7Jun Luo8Mingjie Li9Jinlong Guo10Jinlong Guo11Yachun Su12Yachun Su13Liping Xu14Liping Xu15Youxiong Que16Youxiong Que17Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaNitrogen (N) is very important for sugarcane yield improvement, but the excessive application of N fertilizer brings about N pollution and a cost increase. Through distinguishing the difference of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), we can reasonably apply N fertilizer according to the NUE characteristics of sugarcane varieties, and thus reduce N loss and maintain high yield. The present study showed the pot experiment results of identifying NUE types of nine main sugarcane varieties in the main sugarcane producing areas of China under controlled conditions, and identified the key physiological and agronomic indictors which can help to determine the NUE types of sugarcane. The test clones were exposed to varying levels of N fertilizer and 15 parameters that are likely to impact NUE were measured. The key results are (1) Sugarcane variety ROC22 has the high plant dry weight (PDW) and NUE among nine varieties under different N rates, it can take advantages under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), and less N fertilizer can be applied properly in production. (2) Varieties of GT32 was good performing genotype for PDW and NUE under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), GT42 was more suitable for moderate N environment (450 kg/hm2 urea), while YT94-128 was at middle N and high N supply (450–675 kg/hm2 urea). (3) Late stage of shoot elongation is suitable for differentiating sugarcane clones for NUE. (4) Leaf glutamine synthetase activity is the most reliable predictor of NUE in sugarcane. The result of pot experiment is sufficient to differentiate clonal variation for NUE in sugarcane as it reflects field experimental results. This study can set up a basis for identification the NUE types of sugarcane varieties and the development of reasonable N fertilizer application.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00406/fullsugarcanevarietyphysiologicalagronomicindicatorsnitrogen use efficiency