The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties
Nitrogen (N) is very important for sugarcane yield improvement, but the excessive application of N fertilizer brings about N pollution and a cost increase. Through distinguishing the difference of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), we can reasonably apply N fertilizer according to the NUE characteristic...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00406/full |
id |
doaj-212cd420e7f94fcbbd5845f0eb7d23e9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yingying Yang Yingying Yang Shiwu Gao Shiwu Gao Yong Jiang Zhaoli Lin Zhaoli Lin Jun Luo Jun Luo Mingjie Li Jinlong Guo Jinlong Guo Yachun Su Yachun Su Liping Xu Liping Xu Youxiong Que Youxiong Que |
spellingShingle |
Yingying Yang Yingying Yang Shiwu Gao Shiwu Gao Yong Jiang Zhaoli Lin Zhaoli Lin Jun Luo Jun Luo Mingjie Li Jinlong Guo Jinlong Guo Yachun Su Yachun Su Liping Xu Liping Xu Youxiong Que Youxiong Que The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties Frontiers in Plant Science sugarcane variety physiological agronomic indicators nitrogen use efficiency |
author_facet |
Yingying Yang Yingying Yang Shiwu Gao Shiwu Gao Yong Jiang Zhaoli Lin Zhaoli Lin Jun Luo Jun Luo Mingjie Li Jinlong Guo Jinlong Guo Yachun Su Yachun Su Liping Xu Liping Xu Youxiong Que Youxiong Que |
author_sort |
Yingying Yang |
title |
The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties |
title_short |
The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties |
title_full |
The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties |
title_fullStr |
The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane Varieties |
title_sort |
physiological and agronomic responses to nitrogen dosage in different sugarcane varieties |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
issn |
1664-462X |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Nitrogen (N) is very important for sugarcane yield improvement, but the excessive application of N fertilizer brings about N pollution and a cost increase. Through distinguishing the difference of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), we can reasonably apply N fertilizer according to the NUE characteristics of sugarcane varieties, and thus reduce N loss and maintain high yield. The present study showed the pot experiment results of identifying NUE types of nine main sugarcane varieties in the main sugarcane producing areas of China under controlled conditions, and identified the key physiological and agronomic indictors which can help to determine the NUE types of sugarcane. The test clones were exposed to varying levels of N fertilizer and 15 parameters that are likely to impact NUE were measured. The key results are (1) Sugarcane variety ROC22 has the high plant dry weight (PDW) and NUE among nine varieties under different N rates, it can take advantages under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), and less N fertilizer can be applied properly in production. (2) Varieties of GT32 was good performing genotype for PDW and NUE under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), GT42 was more suitable for moderate N environment (450 kg/hm2 urea), while YT94-128 was at middle N and high N supply (450–675 kg/hm2 urea). (3) Late stage of shoot elongation is suitable for differentiating sugarcane clones for NUE. (4) Leaf glutamine synthetase activity is the most reliable predictor of NUE in sugarcane. The result of pot experiment is sufficient to differentiate clonal variation for NUE in sugarcane as it reflects field experimental results. This study can set up a basis for identification the NUE types of sugarcane varieties and the development of reasonable N fertilizer application. |
topic |
sugarcane variety physiological agronomic indicators nitrogen use efficiency |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00406/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yingyingyang thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yingyingyang thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT shiwugao thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT shiwugao thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yongjiang thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT zhaolilin thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT zhaolilin thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT junluo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT junluo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT mingjieli thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT jinlongguo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT jinlongguo thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yachunsu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yachunsu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT lipingxu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT lipingxu thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT youxiongque thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT youxiongque thephysiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yingyingyang physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yingyingyang physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT shiwugao physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT shiwugao physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yongjiang physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT zhaolilin physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT zhaolilin physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT junluo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT junluo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT mingjieli physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT jinlongguo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT jinlongguo physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yachunsu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT yachunsu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT lipingxu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT lipingxu physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT youxiongque physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties AT youxiongque physiologicalandagronomicresponsestonitrogendosageindifferentsugarcanevarieties |
_version_ |
1725915535733948416 |
spelling |
doaj-212cd420e7f94fcbbd5845f0eb7d23e92020-11-24T21:43:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2019-04-011010.3389/fpls.2019.00406417963The Physiological and Agronomic Responses to Nitrogen Dosage in Different Sugarcane VarietiesYingying Yang0Yingying Yang1Shiwu Gao2Shiwu Gao3Yong Jiang4Zhaoli Lin5Zhaoli Lin6Jun Luo7Jun Luo8Mingjie Li9Jinlong Guo10Jinlong Guo11Yachun Su12Yachun Su13Liping Xu14Liping Xu15Youxiong Que16Youxiong Que17Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaCollege of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaNitrogen (N) is very important for sugarcane yield improvement, but the excessive application of N fertilizer brings about N pollution and a cost increase. Through distinguishing the difference of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), we can reasonably apply N fertilizer according to the NUE characteristics of sugarcane varieties, and thus reduce N loss and maintain high yield. The present study showed the pot experiment results of identifying NUE types of nine main sugarcane varieties in the main sugarcane producing areas of China under controlled conditions, and identified the key physiological and agronomic indictors which can help to determine the NUE types of sugarcane. The test clones were exposed to varying levels of N fertilizer and 15 parameters that are likely to impact NUE were measured. The key results are (1) Sugarcane variety ROC22 has the high plant dry weight (PDW) and NUE among nine varieties under different N rates, it can take advantages under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), and less N fertilizer can be applied properly in production. (2) Varieties of GT32 was good performing genotype for PDW and NUE under low N supply (225 kg/hm2 urea), GT42 was more suitable for moderate N environment (450 kg/hm2 urea), while YT94-128 was at middle N and high N supply (450–675 kg/hm2 urea). (3) Late stage of shoot elongation is suitable for differentiating sugarcane clones for NUE. (4) Leaf glutamine synthetase activity is the most reliable predictor of NUE in sugarcane. The result of pot experiment is sufficient to differentiate clonal variation for NUE in sugarcane as it reflects field experimental results. This study can set up a basis for identification the NUE types of sugarcane varieties and the development of reasonable N fertilizer application.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00406/fullsugarcanevarietyphysiologicalagronomicindicatorsnitrogen use efficiency |