Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Biliary strictures are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The determination of their nature is often difficult. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the second generation of digital single-operator cholangioscopy (SpyGlass DS, DSOC) in indetermi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Diagnostics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/666 |
id |
doaj-212599d320c14b3d8069dd7bb384fd77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-212599d320c14b3d8069dd7bb384fd772020-11-25T03:25:57ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182020-09-011066666610.3390/diagnostics10090666Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisLi-Jia Wen0Jun-Hong Chen1Hong-Ji Xu2Qiong Yu3Kai Liu4Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, ChinaCollege of Clinical Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, ChinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, ChinaBackground: Biliary strictures are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The determination of their nature is often difficult. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the second generation of digital single-operator cholangioscopy (SpyGlass DS, DSOC) in indeterminate biliary strictures (IBDS) through biopsies. Methods: All relative studies published in Medline, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE were included. The diagnostic tests for IBDS were compared to the surgical histology, autopsy, or long-term clinical follow-up. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews (QUADAS-2). Results: A total of 11 studies, which involved 356 patients diagnosed through biopsies, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67–0.80), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–1.00), 10.52 (95% CI: 5.45–20.32), 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23–0.41), and 65.18 (95% CI: 26.79–158.61), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9479, and the pooled adverse event rate was 7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the heterogeneity analysis were <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 48.1% and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 25.4%, respectively. Conclusion: SpyGlass DS is a safe and effective technique for IBDS. However, future randomized trials are needed to determine optimal number of biopsies.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/666digital single-operator cholangioscopySpyGlass™ DSindeterminate biliary stricturecholangiocarcinomaperoral cholangioscopy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Li-Jia Wen Jun-Hong Chen Hong-Ji Xu Qiong Yu Kai Liu |
spellingShingle |
Li-Jia Wen Jun-Hong Chen Hong-Ji Xu Qiong Yu Kai Liu Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Diagnostics digital single-operator cholangioscopy SpyGlass™ DS indeterminate biliary stricture cholangiocarcinoma peroral cholangioscopy |
author_facet |
Li-Jia Wen Jun-Hong Chen Hong-Ji Xu Qiong Yu Kai Liu |
author_sort |
Li-Jia Wen |
title |
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
efficacy and safety of digital single-operator cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures by targeted biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Diagnostics |
issn |
2075-4418 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Background: Biliary strictures are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The determination of their nature is often difficult. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the second generation of digital single-operator cholangioscopy (SpyGlass DS, DSOC) in indeterminate biliary strictures (IBDS) through biopsies. Methods: All relative studies published in Medline, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE were included. The diagnostic tests for IBDS were compared to the surgical histology, autopsy, or long-term clinical follow-up. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews (QUADAS-2). Results: A total of 11 studies, which involved 356 patients diagnosed through biopsies, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67–0.80), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–1.00), 10.52 (95% CI: 5.45–20.32), 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23–0.41), and 65.18 (95% CI: 26.79–158.61), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9479, and the pooled adverse event rate was 7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the heterogeneity analysis were <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 48.1% and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 25.4%, respectively. Conclusion: SpyGlass DS is a safe and effective technique for IBDS. However, future randomized trials are needed to determine optimal number of biopsies. |
topic |
digital single-operator cholangioscopy SpyGlass™ DS indeterminate biliary stricture cholangiocarcinoma peroral cholangioscopy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/666 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lijiawen efficacyandsafetyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopyinthediagnosisofindeterminatebiliarystricturesbytargetedbiopsiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT junhongchen efficacyandsafetyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopyinthediagnosisofindeterminatebiliarystricturesbytargetedbiopsiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongjixu efficacyandsafetyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopyinthediagnosisofindeterminatebiliarystricturesbytargetedbiopsiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qiongyu efficacyandsafetyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopyinthediagnosisofindeterminatebiliarystricturesbytargetedbiopsiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kailiu efficacyandsafetyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopyinthediagnosisofindeterminatebiliarystricturesbytargetedbiopsiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1724594831121973248 |