Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system

Abstract Background Poor health increases the likelihood of experiencing poverty by reducing a person’s ability to work and imparting costs associated with receiving medical treatment. Universal health care is a means of protecting against the impoverishing impact of high healthcare costs. This stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily J. Callander, Haylee Fox, Daniel Lindsay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:Health Economics Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0227-9
id doaj-21255fa46bc94d65b82a1379e48506c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21255fa46bc94d65b82a1379e48506c52020-11-25T03:19:31ZengBMCHealth Economics Review2191-19912019-03-01911810.1186/s13561-019-0227-9Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care systemEmily J. Callander0Haylee Fox1Daniel Lindsay2School of Medicine, Griffith University – Gold Coast campusSchool of Medicine, Griffith University – Gold Coast campusCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Science, James Cook UniversityAbstract Background Poor health increases the likelihood of experiencing poverty by reducing a person’s ability to work and imparting costs associated with receiving medical treatment. Universal health care is a means of protecting against the impoverishing impact of high healthcare costs. This study aims to document the recent trends in the amount paid by Australian households out-of-pocket for healthcare, identify any inequalities in the distribution of this expenditure, and to describe the impact that healthcare costs have on household living standards in a high-income country with a long established universal health care system. We undertook this analysis using a longitudinal, nationally representative dataset – the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, using data collected annually from 2006 to 2014. Out of pocket payments covered those paid to health practitioners, for medication and in private health insurance premiums; catastrophic expenditure was defined as spending 10% or more of household income on healthcare. Results Average total household expenditure on healthcare items remained relatively stable between 2006 and 2014 after adjusting for inflation, changing from $3133 to $3199. However, after adjusting for age, self-reported health status, and year, those in the lowest income group (decile one) had 15 times the odds (95% CI, 11.7–20.8) of having catastrophic health expenditure compared to those in the highest income group (decile ten). The percentage of people in income decile 2 and 3 who had catastrophic health expenditure also increased from 13% to 19% and 7% to 13% respectively. Conclusions Ongoing monitoring of out of pocket healthcare expenditure is an essential part of assessing health system performance, even in countries with universal health care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0227-9Out-of-pocket expenditureUniversal health careAustraliaInequalityHousehold living standardsPoverty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily J. Callander
Haylee Fox
Daniel Lindsay
spellingShingle Emily J. Callander
Haylee Fox
Daniel Lindsay
Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
Health Economics Review
Out-of-pocket expenditure
Universal health care
Australia
Inequality
Household living standards
Poverty
author_facet Emily J. Callander
Haylee Fox
Daniel Lindsay
author_sort Emily J. Callander
title Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
title_short Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
title_full Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
title_fullStr Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
title_full_unstemmed Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
title_sort out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
publisher BMC
series Health Economics Review
issn 2191-1991
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background Poor health increases the likelihood of experiencing poverty by reducing a person’s ability to work and imparting costs associated with receiving medical treatment. Universal health care is a means of protecting against the impoverishing impact of high healthcare costs. This study aims to document the recent trends in the amount paid by Australian households out-of-pocket for healthcare, identify any inequalities in the distribution of this expenditure, and to describe the impact that healthcare costs have on household living standards in a high-income country with a long established universal health care system. We undertook this analysis using a longitudinal, nationally representative dataset – the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, using data collected annually from 2006 to 2014. Out of pocket payments covered those paid to health practitioners, for medication and in private health insurance premiums; catastrophic expenditure was defined as spending 10% or more of household income on healthcare. Results Average total household expenditure on healthcare items remained relatively stable between 2006 and 2014 after adjusting for inflation, changing from $3133 to $3199. However, after adjusting for age, self-reported health status, and year, those in the lowest income group (decile one) had 15 times the odds (95% CI, 11.7–20.8) of having catastrophic health expenditure compared to those in the highest income group (decile ten). The percentage of people in income decile 2 and 3 who had catastrophic health expenditure also increased from 13% to 19% and 7% to 13% respectively. Conclusions Ongoing monitoring of out of pocket healthcare expenditure is an essential part of assessing health system performance, even in countries with universal health care.
topic Out-of-pocket expenditure
Universal health care
Australia
Inequality
Household living standards
Poverty
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0227-9
work_keys_str_mv AT emilyjcallander outofpockethealthcareexpenditureinaustraliatrendsinequalitiesandtheimpactonhouseholdlivingstandardsinahighincomecountrywithauniversalhealthcaresystem
AT hayleefox outofpockethealthcareexpenditureinaustraliatrendsinequalitiesandtheimpactonhouseholdlivingstandardsinahighincomecountrywithauniversalhealthcaresystem
AT daniellindsay outofpockethealthcareexpenditureinaustraliatrendsinequalitiesandtheimpactonhouseholdlivingstandardsinahighincomecountrywithauniversalhealthcaresystem
_version_ 1724621895290060800