PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE

A large number of strategies and implementations of Structure from Motion (SFM) have been developed; some are being included in photogrammetric software packages. However, finding specific parameters highlighting the efficiency, the accuracy and the reliability of a SFM strategy it is difficult. Whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Roncella, C. Re, G. Forlani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-09-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:http://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XXXVIII-5-W16/285/2011/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W16-285-2011.pdf
id doaj-20f79a0aa5c84e568776346cf8048d08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20f79a0aa5c84e568776346cf8048d082020-11-25T01:31:59ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342012-09-01XXXVIII-5/W1628529210.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W16-285-2011PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGER. Roncella0C. Re1G. Forlani2Dept. of Civil Engineering, Parma University, Viale Usberti 181/A, 43124 Parma, ItalyDept. of Civil Engineering, Parma University, Viale Usberti 181/A, 43124 Parma, ItalyDept. of Civil Engineering, Parma University, Viale Usberti 181/A, 43124 Parma, ItalyA large number of strategies and implementations of Structure from Motion (SFM) have been developed; some are being included in photogrammetric software packages. However, finding specific parameters highlighting the efficiency, the accuracy and the reliability of a SFM strategy it is difficult. While most strategies will almost always succeed in any given task (i.e. the orientation of a certain image sequence), judging how good is actually the result, is somehow still an open issue. In the first part of this paper some alternatives and parameters are presented and their pro and cons discussed, with the objective to find out whether there are alternatives to the well-established method of the check points. In the second part, the results of most of the image sequences made available by the workshop organizers, processed with the SFM approach developed by the authors, are presented; results for the sequences where external information (such as ground control points or a DTM) were available are presented in more detail.http://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XXXVIII-5-W16/285/2011/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W16-285-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Roncella
C. Re
G. Forlani
spellingShingle R. Roncella
C. Re
G. Forlani
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
author_facet R. Roncella
C. Re
G. Forlani
author_sort R. Roncella
title PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
title_short PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
title_full PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
title_fullStr PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
title_full_unstemmed PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGY IN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
title_sort performance evaluation of a structure and motion strategy in architecture and cultural heritage
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
publishDate 2012-09-01
description A large number of strategies and implementations of Structure from Motion (SFM) have been developed; some are being included in photogrammetric software packages. However, finding specific parameters highlighting the efficiency, the accuracy and the reliability of a SFM strategy it is difficult. While most strategies will almost always succeed in any given task (i.e. the orientation of a certain image sequence), judging how good is actually the result, is somehow still an open issue. In the first part of this paper some alternatives and parameters are presented and their pro and cons discussed, with the objective to find out whether there are alternatives to the well-established method of the check points. In the second part, the results of most of the image sequences made available by the workshop organizers, processed with the SFM approach developed by the authors, are presented; results for the sequences where external information (such as ground control points or a DTM) were available are presented in more detail.
url http://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XXXVIII-5-W16/285/2011/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W16-285-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rroncella performanceevaluationofastructureandmotionstrategyinarchitectureandculturalheritage
AT cre performanceevaluationofastructureandmotionstrategyinarchitectureandculturalheritage
AT gforlani performanceevaluationofastructureandmotionstrategyinarchitectureandculturalheritage
_version_ 1725084063786598400