STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES

This article describesthree examples of bridge-type relieving constructionslocatedon railway lines inthe areas of active mining exploitation.It discusseshow to take into account mining influences and how to supporta temporary relieving construction on the railway embankment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piotr BĘTKOWSKI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Silesian University of Technology 2020-06-01
Series:Transport Problems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://transportproblems.polsl.pl/pl/Archiwum/2020/zeszyt2/2020t15z2_10.pdf
id doaj-20f009975d734409b907ef83d80051b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20f009975d734409b907ef83d80051b22020-11-25T03:32:42ZengSilesian University of TechnologyTransport Problems1896-05962300-861X2020-06-0115210711810.21307/tp-2020-024STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGESPiotr BĘTKOWSKI0Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Civil EngineeringThis article describesthree examples of bridge-type relieving constructionslocatedon railway lines inthe areas of active mining exploitation.It discusseshow to take into account mining influences and how to supporta temporary relieving construction on the railway embankment.This article discusses the incorrectsolutions and their consequences. The first example involvesthe protection oftrain traffic continuity during the replacement ofbridgespanunder an intensively used railway line. The second example shows the incorrect use of the relieving construction, leading to the relaxation of soil ground base and failure of a small brick arch railway bridge. The third example describes the use of the relieving construction as a permanent span of the railway bridgelocates in the area where mining subsidence is over 14 m. The railway line locateson the third bridge;itis a single-track line,which is the only way totransportcoal and equipment needed for operationina large underground coalmine;interruptions of railway traffic longer than 4 working days(5consecutive days)are unacceptable. This article hasbasic information abouttheeffects of mining impacts,bridge-type steel relief constructions and a theoretical introduction enabling analysis of interactions of temporary supports and embankment in mining areas. Allexamples, especially the third one, contribute to development of knowledge in the field of civil engineering and transport.http://transportproblems.polsl.pl/pl/Archiwum/2020/zeszyt2/2020t15z2_10.pdfrelieving constructiontemporaryviaductbridgemining areadamagerailway line
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Piotr BĘTKOWSKI
spellingShingle Piotr BĘTKOWSKI
STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES
Transport Problems
relieving construction
temporaryviaduct
bridge
mining area
damage
railway line
author_facet Piotr BĘTKOWSKI
author_sort Piotr BĘTKOWSKI
title STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES
title_short STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES
title_full STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES
title_fullStr STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES
title_full_unstemmed STEEL RELIEVING CONSTRUCTIONS INMINING AREAS ASTEMPORARY OR PERMANENTRAILWAY BRIDGES
title_sort steel relieving constructions inmining areas astemporary or permanentrailway bridges
publisher Silesian University of Technology
series Transport Problems
issn 1896-0596
2300-861X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description This article describesthree examples of bridge-type relieving constructionslocatedon railway lines inthe areas of active mining exploitation.It discusseshow to take into account mining influences and how to supporta temporary relieving construction on the railway embankment.This article discusses the incorrectsolutions and their consequences. The first example involvesthe protection oftrain traffic continuity during the replacement ofbridgespanunder an intensively used railway line. The second example shows the incorrect use of the relieving construction, leading to the relaxation of soil ground base and failure of a small brick arch railway bridge. The third example describes the use of the relieving construction as a permanent span of the railway bridgelocates in the area where mining subsidence is over 14 m. The railway line locateson the third bridge;itis a single-track line,which is the only way totransportcoal and equipment needed for operationina large underground coalmine;interruptions of railway traffic longer than 4 working days(5consecutive days)are unacceptable. This article hasbasic information abouttheeffects of mining impacts,bridge-type steel relief constructions and a theoretical introduction enabling analysis of interactions of temporary supports and embankment in mining areas. Allexamples, especially the third one, contribute to development of knowledge in the field of civil engineering and transport.
topic relieving construction
temporaryviaduct
bridge
mining area
damage
railway line
url http://transportproblems.polsl.pl/pl/Archiwum/2020/zeszyt2/2020t15z2_10.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrbetkowski steelrelievingconstructionsinminingareasastemporaryorpermanentrailwaybridges
_version_ 1724566631484489728