Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data
Open data is information made freely available to third parties in structured formats without restrictive licensing conditions, permitting commercial and noncommercial organizations to innovate. In the context of National Health Service (NHS) data, this is intended to improve patient outc...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2020/1/e15603 |
id |
doaj-20e61f0134f049e8b336b40818be429f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-20e61f0134f049e8b336b40818be429f2021-04-02T18:41:04ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712020-01-01221e1560310.2196/15603Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open DataBacon, SebGoldacre, Ben Open data is information made freely available to third parties in structured formats without restrictive licensing conditions, permitting commercial and noncommercial organizations to innovate. In the context of National Health Service (NHS) data, this is intended to improve patient outcomes and efficiency. EBM DataLab is a research group with a focus on online tools which turn our research findings into actionable monthly outputs. We regularly import and process more than 15 different NHS open datasets to deliver OpenPrescribing.net, one of the most high-impact use cases for NHS England’s open data, with over 15,000 unique users each month. In this paper, we have described the many breaches of best practices around NHS open data that we have encountered. Examples include datasets that repeatedly change location without warning or forwarding; datasets that are needlessly behind a “CAPTCHA” and so cannot be automatically downloaded; longitudinal datasets that change their structure without warning or documentation; near-duplicate datasets with unexplained differences; datasets that are impossible to locate, and thus may or may not exist; poor or absent documentation; and withholding of data for dubious reasons. We propose new open ways of working that will support better analytics for all users of the NHS. These include better curation, better documentation, and systems for better dialogue with technical teams.https://www.jmir.org/2020/1/e15603 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben |
spellingShingle |
Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data Journal of Medical Internet Research |
author_facet |
Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben |
author_sort |
Bacon, Seb |
title |
Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_short |
Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_full |
Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_fullStr |
Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_sort |
barriers to working with national health service england’s open data |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Internet Research |
issn |
1438-8871 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Open data is information made freely available to third parties in structured formats without restrictive licensing conditions, permitting commercial and noncommercial organizations to innovate. In the context of National Health Service (NHS) data, this is intended to improve patient outcomes and efficiency. EBM DataLab is a research group with a focus on online tools which turn our research findings into actionable monthly outputs. We regularly import and process more than 15 different NHS open datasets to deliver OpenPrescribing.net, one of the most high-impact use cases for NHS England’s open data, with over 15,000 unique users each month. In this paper, we have described the many breaches of best practices around NHS open data that we have encountered. Examples include datasets that repeatedly change location without warning or forwarding; datasets that are needlessly behind a “CAPTCHA” and so cannot be automatically downloaded; longitudinal datasets that change their structure without warning or documentation; near-duplicate datasets with unexplained differences; datasets that are impossible to locate, and thus may or may not exist; poor or absent documentation; and withholding of data for dubious reasons. We propose new open ways of working that will support better analytics for all users of the NHS. These include better curation, better documentation, and systems for better dialogue with technical teams. |
url |
https://www.jmir.org/2020/1/e15603 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT baconseb barrierstoworkingwithnationalhealthserviceenglandsopendata AT goldacreben barrierstoworkingwithnationalhealthserviceenglandsopendata |
_version_ |
1721551125086208000 |