Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3679083?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-20e4ec7150bf409b87ba029fcab442f3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-20e4ec7150bf409b87ba029fcab442f32020-11-25T02:19:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6220210.1371/journal.pone.0062202Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.Kent KovacsStephen PolaskyErik NelsonBonnie L KeelerDerric PenningtonAndrew J PlantingaSteven J TaffWe evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3679083?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kent Kovacs Stephen Polasky Erik Nelson Bonnie L Keeler Derric Pennington Andrew J Plantinga Steven J Taff |
spellingShingle |
Kent Kovacs Stephen Polasky Erik Nelson Bonnie L Keeler Derric Pennington Andrew J Plantinga Steven J Taff Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Kent Kovacs Stephen Polasky Erik Nelson Bonnie L Keeler Derric Pennington Andrew J Plantinga Steven J Taff |
author_sort |
Kent Kovacs |
title |
Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. |
title_short |
Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. |
title_full |
Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. |
title_sort |
evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3679083?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kentkovacs evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions AT stephenpolasky evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions AT eriknelson evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions AT bonnielkeeler evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions AT derricpennington evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions AT andrewjplantinga evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions AT stevenjtaff evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions |
_version_ |
1724874415200534528 |