Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.

We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kent Kovacs, Stephen Polasky, Erik Nelson, Bonnie L Keeler, Derric Pennington, Andrew J Plantinga, Steven J Taff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3679083?pdf=render
id doaj-20e4ec7150bf409b87ba029fcab442f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20e4ec7150bf409b87ba029fcab442f32020-11-25T02:19:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6220210.1371/journal.pone.0062202Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.Kent KovacsStephen PolaskyErik NelsonBonnie L KeelerDerric PenningtonAndrew J PlantingaSteven J TaffWe evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3679083?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kent Kovacs
Stephen Polasky
Erik Nelson
Bonnie L Keeler
Derric Pennington
Andrew J Plantinga
Steven J Taff
spellingShingle Kent Kovacs
Stephen Polasky
Erik Nelson
Bonnie L Keeler
Derric Pennington
Andrew J Plantinga
Steven J Taff
Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kent Kovacs
Stephen Polasky
Erik Nelson
Bonnie L Keeler
Derric Pennington
Andrew J Plantinga
Steven J Taff
author_sort Kent Kovacs
title Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
title_short Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
title_full Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
title_fullStr Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
title_sort evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3679083?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kentkovacs evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT stephenpolasky evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT eriknelson evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT bonnielkeeler evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT derricpennington evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT andrewjplantinga evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT stevenjtaff evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
_version_ 1724874415200534528