CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Background: Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are important for designating a distinct subgroup of children and adolescents with behaviour problems.  As a result, CU traits are now used to form the specifier “with Limited Prosocial Emotions” that is part of the diagnostic criteria for the Conduct Diso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luna C.M. Centifanti, Hannah Shaw, Katherine J. Atherton, Nicholas D. Thomson, Susanne MacLellan, Paul J. Frick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2020-02-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1027/v2
id doaj-20d4449185084e47b9942720874b4a37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20d4449185084e47b9942720874b4a372020-11-25T03:21:22ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022020-02-01810.12688/f1000research.19605.224911CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]Luna C.M. Centifanti0Hannah Shaw1Katherine J. Atherton2Nicholas D. Thomson3Susanne MacLellan4Paul J. Frick5Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKDepartment of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, UKDepartment of Surgery Division of Acute Care Surgical Services, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, UKDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USABackground: Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are important for designating a distinct subgroup of children and adolescents with behaviour problems.  As a result, CU traits are now used to form the specifier “with Limited Prosocial Emotions” that is part of the diagnostic criteria for the Conduct Disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11).  Given this inclusion in major classification systems, it is important to develop and test methods for assessing these traits that can be used in clinical settings.  The present study aimed to validate a clinician rating of CU traits, the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions, Version 1.1 (CAPE 1.1), in a sample of hard-to-reach families referred to a government program designed to prevent the development of behaviour problems in high risk families. Methods: Clinical ratings of children were obtained from 34 families of children ages 5 to 18 (M=13.5; SD=3.2). The ratings on the CAPE 1.1 were based on interviews with both parent and child. Results: Of the sample, 21% (100% male) met the diagnostic cut-off for the specifier according to the CAPE 1.1, and CAPE 1.1 scores were associated with parent ratings of CU traits, psychopathic traits, and externalising behaviours. CAPE 1.1 ratings were also associated with risk for violence obtained from case files.  Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary evidence for the validity of the CAPE 1.1 as clinician rated measure of CU traits.https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1027/v2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luna C.M. Centifanti
Hannah Shaw
Katherine J. Atherton
Nicholas D. Thomson
Susanne MacLellan
Paul J. Frick
spellingShingle Luna C.M. Centifanti
Hannah Shaw
Katherine J. Atherton
Nicholas D. Thomson
Susanne MacLellan
Paul J. Frick
CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
F1000Research
author_facet Luna C.M. Centifanti
Hannah Shaw
Katherine J. Atherton
Nicholas D. Thomson
Susanne MacLellan
Paul J. Frick
author_sort Luna C.M. Centifanti
title CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_short CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_full CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_fullStr CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_full_unstemmed CAPE for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_sort cape for measuring callous-unemotional traits in disadvantaged families: a cross-sectional validation study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Background: Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are important for designating a distinct subgroup of children and adolescents with behaviour problems.  As a result, CU traits are now used to form the specifier “with Limited Prosocial Emotions” that is part of the diagnostic criteria for the Conduct Disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11).  Given this inclusion in major classification systems, it is important to develop and test methods for assessing these traits that can be used in clinical settings.  The present study aimed to validate a clinician rating of CU traits, the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions, Version 1.1 (CAPE 1.1), in a sample of hard-to-reach families referred to a government program designed to prevent the development of behaviour problems in high risk families. Methods: Clinical ratings of children were obtained from 34 families of children ages 5 to 18 (M=13.5; SD=3.2). The ratings on the CAPE 1.1 were based on interviews with both parent and child. Results: Of the sample, 21% (100% male) met the diagnostic cut-off for the specifier according to the CAPE 1.1, and CAPE 1.1 scores were associated with parent ratings of CU traits, psychopathic traits, and externalising behaviours. CAPE 1.1 ratings were also associated with risk for violence obtained from case files.  Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary evidence for the validity of the CAPE 1.1 as clinician rated measure of CU traits.
url https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1027/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT lunacmcentifanti capeformeasuringcallousunemotionaltraitsindisadvantagedfamiliesacrosssectionalvalidationstudyversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
AT hannahshaw capeformeasuringcallousunemotionaltraitsindisadvantagedfamiliesacrosssectionalvalidationstudyversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
AT katherinejatherton capeformeasuringcallousunemotionaltraitsindisadvantagedfamiliesacrosssectionalvalidationstudyversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
AT nicholasdthomson capeformeasuringcallousunemotionaltraitsindisadvantagedfamiliesacrosssectionalvalidationstudyversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
AT susannemaclellan capeformeasuringcallousunemotionaltraitsindisadvantagedfamiliesacrosssectionalvalidationstudyversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
AT pauljfrick capeformeasuringcallousunemotionaltraitsindisadvantagedfamiliesacrosssectionalvalidationstudyversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
_version_ 1724615094150627328