Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology
Objectives This study aimed to identify the guiding ethical principles that should be considered for critical resource allocation during pandemic emergency situations, and especially for the COVID-19 outbreak. The secondary objective was to define the priority to be assigned to each principle.Settin...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043239.full |
id |
doaj-20d2b5d081024c418e1d02085aab8331 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-20d2b5d081024c418e1d02085aab83312021-10-01T03:30:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111510.1136/bmjopen-2020-043239Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodologyElisabetta Poluzzi0Giovanni Brandi1Francesco Pugliese2Giuseppe Di Pasquale3Primiano Iannone4Anita Zeneli5Danilo Orlandini6Piero De Carolis7Fausto Catena8Filippo Giovanardi9Giorgia Valpiani10Renato Mantovani11Eugenia Magnanimi12Sant`Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, ItalyDigestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, ItalyDepartment of Cardiology, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy1Emergency Department, Ospedale del Tigullio, Lavagna, Genova, ItalyIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRST IRCCS, Meldola, ItalyEthical Committee AVEC, Bologna, ItalyEthical Committee AVEC, Bologna, ItalyEmergency and Trauma Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, ItalyAUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, ItalySant`Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, ItalyEthical Committee AVEC, Bologna, ItalyUniversity of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, ItalyObjectives This study aimed to identify the guiding ethical principles that should be considered for critical resource allocation during pandemic emergency situations, and especially for the COVID-19 outbreak. The secondary objective was to define the priority to be assigned to each principle.Setting The study was conducted from March to June 2020 within the context of an ethical committee (EC) in Northern Italy.Participants Eleven EC members and five additional external healthcare and bioethical professionals, forming a multidisciplinary panel, took part in the study.Primary and secondary outcome measures The compilation of a list of ethical principles (maximum of 10 items) and their priority ranking and application within an emergency pandemic context was established as the expected outcome of this work.Results A consensus on 10 guiding ethical principles was reached by the multidisciplinary panel. Transparency ranked first on the priority list as the most frequently voted principle, followed by the number of lives saved, life-years saved, respect for individuals’ autonomy and equity. Other principles including life cycle, ‘sickest first’, reciprocity, instrumental value and lottery were also considered appropriate as potential tiebreakers. These principles were discussed and made consistent with the current Italian pandemic context by producing an explanatory document.Conclusions The identified principles could be used in preparedness plans to guide resource allocation during pandemic events. By combining their rank and relevance in relation to disease, health system organisations, social and economic settings, and critical resources at risk of scarcity, these principles could help to maximise the benefit of resource use for the community, thus reducing inequalities for individuals.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043239.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elisabetta Poluzzi Giovanni Brandi Francesco Pugliese Giuseppe Di Pasquale Primiano Iannone Anita Zeneli Danilo Orlandini Piero De Carolis Fausto Catena Filippo Giovanardi Giorgia Valpiani Renato Mantovani Eugenia Magnanimi |
spellingShingle |
Elisabetta Poluzzi Giovanni Brandi Francesco Pugliese Giuseppe Di Pasquale Primiano Iannone Anita Zeneli Danilo Orlandini Piero De Carolis Fausto Catena Filippo Giovanardi Giorgia Valpiani Renato Mantovani Eugenia Magnanimi Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology BMJ Open |
author_facet |
Elisabetta Poluzzi Giovanni Brandi Francesco Pugliese Giuseppe Di Pasquale Primiano Iannone Anita Zeneli Danilo Orlandini Piero De Carolis Fausto Catena Filippo Giovanardi Giorgia Valpiani Renato Mantovani Eugenia Magnanimi |
author_sort |
Elisabetta Poluzzi |
title |
Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology |
title_short |
Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology |
title_full |
Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology |
title_fullStr |
Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology |
title_sort |
identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the covid-19 pandemic: an italian ethical committee perspective using delphi methodology |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Objectives This study aimed to identify the guiding ethical principles that should be considered for critical resource allocation during pandemic emergency situations, and especially for the COVID-19 outbreak. The secondary objective was to define the priority to be assigned to each principle.Setting The study was conducted from March to June 2020 within the context of an ethical committee (EC) in Northern Italy.Participants Eleven EC members and five additional external healthcare and bioethical professionals, forming a multidisciplinary panel, took part in the study.Primary and secondary outcome measures The compilation of a list of ethical principles (maximum of 10 items) and their priority ranking and application within an emergency pandemic context was established as the expected outcome of this work.Results A consensus on 10 guiding ethical principles was reached by the multidisciplinary panel. Transparency ranked first on the priority list as the most frequently voted principle, followed by the number of lives saved, life-years saved, respect for individuals’ autonomy and equity. Other principles including life cycle, ‘sickest first’, reciprocity, instrumental value and lottery were also considered appropriate as potential tiebreakers. These principles were discussed and made consistent with the current Italian pandemic context by producing an explanatory document.Conclusions The identified principles could be used in preparedness plans to guide resource allocation during pandemic events. By combining their rank and relevance in relation to disease, health system organisations, social and economic settings, and critical resources at risk of scarcity, these principles could help to maximise the benefit of resource use for the community, thus reducing inequalities for individuals. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043239.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elisabettapoluzzi identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT giovannibrandi identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT francescopugliese identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT giuseppedipasquale identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT primianoiannone identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT anitazeneli identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT daniloorlandini identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT pierodecarolis identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT faustocatena identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT filippogiovanardi identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT giorgiavalpiani identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT renatomantovani identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology AT eugeniamagnanimi identifyingethicalvaluesforguidingtriagedecisionsduringthecovid19pandemicanitalianethicalcommitteeperspectiveusingdelphimethodology |
_version_ |
1716862377379495936 |