Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic

Community participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their vo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pánek Jiří
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-09-01
Series:Quaestiones Geographicae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031
id doaj-20c7f39f1fd04c4ab5bd529932440f37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20c7f39f1fd04c4ab5bd529932440f372021-09-05T21:23:40ZengSciendoQuaestiones Geographicae2081-63832018-09-0137315116210.2478/quageo-2018-0031quageo-2018-0031Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech RepublicPánek Jiří0Department of Development and Environmental Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech RepublicCommunity participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their voices heard. This paper presents a case study of the deployment of such an online mapping platform in Jeseník, Czech Republic. In total, 533 respondents took part in the online mapping survey, which included six spatial questions. Respondents marked 4,714 points and added 1,538 comments to these points. The main aim of the research was to find whether there were any significant differences in the answers from selected groups (age, gender, home location) of respondents. The results show largest differences in answers of various (below 20 and above 20 year) age groups. Nevertheless further statistical examination would be needed to confirm the visual comparison.https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031emotional mapscrowdsourcinggeoparticipationonline mapscommunity participation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pánek Jiří
spellingShingle Pánek Jiří
Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
Quaestiones Geographicae
emotional maps
crowdsourcing
geoparticipation
online maps
community participation
author_facet Pánek Jiří
author_sort Pánek Jiří
title Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
title_short Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
title_full Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
title_fullStr Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
title_full_unstemmed Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
title_sort participatory mapping in community participation – case study of jeseník, czech republic
publisher Sciendo
series Quaestiones Geographicae
issn 2081-6383
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Community participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their voices heard. This paper presents a case study of the deployment of such an online mapping platform in Jeseník, Czech Republic. In total, 533 respondents took part in the online mapping survey, which included six spatial questions. Respondents marked 4,714 points and added 1,538 comments to these points. The main aim of the research was to find whether there were any significant differences in the answers from selected groups (age, gender, home location) of respondents. The results show largest differences in answers of various (below 20 and above 20 year) age groups. Nevertheless further statistical examination would be needed to confirm the visual comparison.
topic emotional maps
crowdsourcing
geoparticipation
online maps
community participation
url https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031
work_keys_str_mv AT panekjiri participatorymappingincommunityparticipationcasestudyofjesenikczechrepublic
_version_ 1717780670460198912