Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content
Distance education and e-learning has been around for some time now. The ubiquitous development of the internet (Sharples, 2007) has however made way for the emergence of new educational formats such as the much talked-about Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Within MOOCs users have access to educ...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Statsbiblioteket
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Læring og Medier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/24379 |
id |
doaj-20c4eb4e1397460c9642dbad4fb4b2ef |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-20c4eb4e1397460c9642dbad4fb4b2ef2020-11-25T00:17:03ZdanStatsbiblioteketLæring og Medier1903-248X2016-11-0191610.7146/lom.v9i16.2437922821Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of contentKim Haagen Mathiesen0Mathias Helbo Nedergaard1Rikke Toft Nørgård2Behandlingsinstitutionen Eggertshus & Aarhus UniversitetAarhus UniversitetAarhus UniversitetDistance education and e-learning has been around for some time now. The ubiquitous development of the internet (Sharples, 2007) has however made way for the emergence of new educational formats such as the much talked-about Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Within MOOCs users have access to educational literature and tasks at all times, which allow users to fit the course into their own pace, place and Personal Learning Environment (Attwell 2007). Today MOOCs has spread across the globe, and in Denmark we now see institutions such as Aarhus University developing a new course with roots in the MOOC format, however without the ‘Massive’ part (Aarhus University, 2016). Over a 5 week period we conducted a netnographic (Kozinet, 2015) mixed methods research of the MOOC Blended Learning Essentials (https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/blended-learning-gettingstarted/2). Contrary to the acclaimed potentials of MOOCs, our research showed a pronounced lack of dialogue and a high degree of what Freire (1996) calls “the banking concept of education,” entailing a high amount of one-way knowledge transmission (Hoem, 2006). To circumvent these tendencies, the paper presents a case analysis and design framework for moving MOOCs beyond “the banking concept of education” and towards dialogue in ways that support critical thinking; a high-level cognitive skill essential to higher education (Laurillard, 2012).https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/24379learning designMOOCcritical pedagogyteaching designblended learning: online dialogue |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Danish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kim Haagen Mathiesen Mathias Helbo Nedergaard Rikke Toft Nørgård |
spellingShingle |
Kim Haagen Mathiesen Mathias Helbo Nedergaard Rikke Toft Nørgård Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content Læring og Medier learning design MOOC critical pedagogy teaching design blended learning: online dialogue |
author_facet |
Kim Haagen Mathiesen Mathias Helbo Nedergaard Rikke Toft Nørgård |
author_sort |
Kim Haagen Mathiesen |
title |
Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content |
title_short |
Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content |
title_full |
Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content |
title_fullStr |
Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content |
title_sort |
critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving moocs beyond unidirectional transmission of content |
publisher |
Statsbiblioteket |
series |
Læring og Medier |
issn |
1903-248X |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
Distance education and e-learning has been around for some time now. The ubiquitous development of the internet (Sharples, 2007) has however made way for the emergence of new educational formats such as the much talked-about Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Within MOOCs users have access to educational literature and tasks at all times, which allow users to fit the course into their own pace, place and Personal Learning Environment (Attwell 2007).
Today MOOCs has spread across the globe, and in Denmark we now see institutions such as Aarhus University developing a new course with roots in the MOOC format, however without the ‘Massive’ part (Aarhus University, 2016).
Over a 5 week period we conducted a netnographic (Kozinet, 2015) mixed methods research of the MOOC Blended Learning Essentials (https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/blended-learning-gettingstarted/2). Contrary to the acclaimed potentials of MOOCs, our research showed a pronounced lack of dialogue and a high degree of what Freire (1996) calls “the banking concept of education,” entailing a high amount of one-way knowledge transmission (Hoem, 2006). To circumvent these tendencies, the paper presents a case analysis and design framework for moving MOOCs beyond “the banking concept of education” and towards dialogue in ways that support critical thinking; a high-level cognitive skill essential to higher education (Laurillard, 2012). |
topic |
learning design MOOC critical pedagogy teaching design blended learning: online dialogue |
url |
https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/view/24379 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kimhaagenmathiesen criticalreflectionanddialogicallearningdesignmovingmoocsbeyondunidirectionaltransmissionofcontent AT mathiashelbonedergaard criticalreflectionanddialogicallearningdesignmovingmoocsbeyondunidirectionaltransmissionofcontent AT rikketoftnørgard criticalreflectionanddialogicallearningdesignmovingmoocsbeyondunidirectionaltransmissionofcontent |
_version_ |
1725381339862007808 |