A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective

The nature and function of Evil Eye Belief and Practice (EEBP) in the world of the Old Testament has been understudied. The majority view has been that the belief was limited to the notion of largesse in this collection of literature. This article demonstrated that the idiom  םינעב  ללק in Genesis 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zacharias Kotze
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2017-06-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/4530
id doaj-20bbcd26ad504e8da8ac4e62e859efc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20bbcd26ad504e8da8ac4e62e859efc02020-11-24T20:57:54ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502017-06-01733e1e610.4102/hts.v73i3.45303849A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspectiveZacharias Kotze0Department of Biblical and Ancient Studies, University of South AfricaThe nature and function of Evil Eye Belief and Practice (EEBP) in the world of the Old Testament has been understudied. The majority view has been that the belief was limited to the notion of largesse in this collection of literature. This article demonstrated that the idiom  םינעב  ללק in Genesis 16:4-5, routinely interpreted as a metaphor for scorn on the part of Hagar, could in fact be interpreted as a linguistic vehicle for the concept of the malevolent eye of Sarai. The author argued for an interpretation wherein Sarai, driven by envy, accused Hagar of casting the evil eye on her and used this alleged transgression as an excuse to abuse her slave. The evil eye in the Old Testament was not restricted to the idea of generosity, but was also closely associated with the concept of envy, as has been the case in the majority of ancient and modern cultures in which EEPB has featured. It further confirmed that the social function of the evil eye in the ancient world was not only constrained to the avoidance of envy-related violence but also served as an instrument of oppression in the hands of the rich and privileged. The key method utilised in this study was the social-scientific approach to the interpretation of biblical literature.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/4530SaraiHagarevil eyeenvy-related violence
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zacharias Kotze
spellingShingle Zacharias Kotze
A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Sarai
Hagar
evil eye
envy-related violence
author_facet Zacharias Kotze
author_sort Zacharias Kotze
title A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective
title_short A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective
title_full A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective
title_fullStr A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective
title_full_unstemmed A case of the evil eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A social-scientific perspective
title_sort case of the evil eye in genesis 16:4-5: a social-scientific perspective
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The nature and function of Evil Eye Belief and Practice (EEBP) in the world of the Old Testament has been understudied. The majority view has been that the belief was limited to the notion of largesse in this collection of literature. This article demonstrated that the idiom  םינעב  ללק in Genesis 16:4-5, routinely interpreted as a metaphor for scorn on the part of Hagar, could in fact be interpreted as a linguistic vehicle for the concept of the malevolent eye of Sarai. The author argued for an interpretation wherein Sarai, driven by envy, accused Hagar of casting the evil eye on her and used this alleged transgression as an excuse to abuse her slave. The evil eye in the Old Testament was not restricted to the idea of generosity, but was also closely associated with the concept of envy, as has been the case in the majority of ancient and modern cultures in which EEPB has featured. It further confirmed that the social function of the evil eye in the ancient world was not only constrained to the avoidance of envy-related violence but also served as an instrument of oppression in the hands of the rich and privileged. The key method utilised in this study was the social-scientific approach to the interpretation of biblical literature.
topic Sarai
Hagar
evil eye
envy-related violence
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/4530
work_keys_str_mv AT zachariaskotze acaseoftheevileyeingenesis1645asocialscientificperspective
AT zachariaskotze caseoftheevileyeingenesis1645asocialscientificperspective
_version_ 1716787247953477632