A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
In one of the final scenes of his 1511 woodcut sequence, The Small Passion, Albrecht Dürer depicts the newly risen Christ extending his forefinger towards the head of Mary Magdalen. As a moment of touching, the Noli me tangere belongs to a category of representations that attests to the indexical na...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Open University
2015-02-01
|
Series: | The Open Arts Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://openartsjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/oaj_issue4_brisman.pdf |
id |
doaj-20b5b63e974243f29d92fad9ed585cc7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-20b5b63e974243f29d92fad9ed585cc72020-11-24T23:01:13ZengThe Open UniversityThe Open Arts Journal2050-36792015-02-01492710.5456/issn.2050-3679/2015w01A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theologyShira Brisman 0University of Wisconsin-MadisonIn one of the final scenes of his 1511 woodcut sequence, The Small Passion, Albrecht Dürer depicts the newly risen Christ extending his forefinger towards the head of Mary Magdalen. As a moment of touching, the Noli me tangere belongs to a category of representations that attests to the indexical nature of Christ’s image. The stain of his face on Veronica’s cloth or the imprints of his feet on the mountain from which he ascended are testaments to his corporeal presence on earth. Throughout The Small Passion, Dürer expands the vocabulary of indexical transfer to a haptic theology and proves the suitability of prints as a language in which to tell the story of God’s mark on earth in the form of Christ. Yet, at the same time, subtle underminings of these moments of contact signal Christ’s touch as impermanent, a substitute for a more sustained embrace to come. In emphasising the transmission and dissemination of Christ’s contact through a visual vocabulary of touching, pressing, hugging and kissing, Dürer also finds a language with which to describe the process of printing itself and the power – and limitations – of a medium both widely reproducible and constrained in its durability as a corporeal substitute.https://openartsjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/oaj_issue4_brisman.pdfDürerprintsSmall PassionNoli me tangereMary Magdalenindexicalityself-referentiality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shira Brisman |
spellingShingle |
Shira Brisman A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology The Open Arts Journal Dürer prints Small Passion Noli me tangere Mary Magdalen indexicality self-referentiality |
author_facet |
Shira Brisman |
author_sort |
Shira Brisman |
title |
A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology |
title_short |
A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology |
title_full |
A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology |
title_fullStr |
A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology |
title_full_unstemmed |
A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology |
title_sort |
touching compassion: dürer’s haptic theology |
publisher |
The Open University |
series |
The Open Arts Journal |
issn |
2050-3679 |
publishDate |
2015-02-01 |
description |
In one of the final scenes of his 1511 woodcut sequence, The Small Passion, Albrecht Dürer depicts the newly risen Christ extending his forefinger towards the head of Mary Magdalen. As a moment of touching, the Noli me tangere belongs to a category of representations that attests to the indexical nature of Christ’s image. The stain of his face on Veronica’s cloth or the imprints of his feet on the mountain from which he ascended are testaments to his corporeal presence on earth. Throughout The Small Passion, Dürer expands the vocabulary of indexical transfer to a haptic theology and proves the suitability of prints as a language in which to tell the story of God’s mark on earth in the form of Christ. Yet, at the same time, subtle underminings of these moments of contact signal Christ’s touch as impermanent, a substitute for a more sustained embrace to come. In emphasising the transmission and dissemination of Christ’s contact through a visual vocabulary of touching, pressing, hugging and kissing, Dürer also finds a language with which to describe the process of printing itself and the power – and limitations – of a medium both widely reproducible and constrained in its durability as a corporeal substitute. |
topic |
Dürer prints Small Passion Noli me tangere Mary Magdalen indexicality self-referentiality |
url |
https://openartsjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/oaj_issue4_brisman.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shirabrisman atouchingcompassiondurershaptictheology AT shirabrisman touchingcompassiondurershaptictheology |
_version_ |
1725640252050112512 |