A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology

In one of the final scenes of his 1511 woodcut sequence, The Small Passion, Albrecht Dürer depicts the newly risen Christ extending his forefinger towards the head of Mary Magdalen. As a moment of touching, the Noli me tangere belongs to a category of representations that attests to the indexical na...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shira Brisman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Open University 2015-02-01
Series:The Open Arts Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://openartsjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/oaj_issue4_brisman.pdf
id doaj-20b5b63e974243f29d92fad9ed585cc7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20b5b63e974243f29d92fad9ed585cc72020-11-24T23:01:13ZengThe Open UniversityThe Open Arts Journal2050-36792015-02-01492710.5456/issn.2050-3679/2015w01A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theologyShira Brisman 0University of Wisconsin-MadisonIn one of the final scenes of his 1511 woodcut sequence, The Small Passion, Albrecht Dürer depicts the newly risen Christ extending his forefinger towards the head of Mary Magdalen. As a moment of touching, the Noli me tangere belongs to a category of representations that attests to the indexical nature of Christ’s image. The stain of his face on Veronica’s cloth or the imprints of his feet on the mountain from which he ascended are testaments to his corporeal presence on earth. Throughout The Small Passion, Dürer expands the vocabulary of indexical transfer to a haptic theology and proves the suitability of prints as a language in which to tell the story of God’s mark on earth in the form of Christ. Yet, at the same time, subtle underminings of these moments of contact signal Christ’s touch as impermanent, a substitute for a more sustained embrace to come. In emphasising the transmission and dissemination of Christ’s contact through a visual vocabulary of touching, pressing, hugging and kissing, Dürer also finds a language with which to describe the process of printing itself and the power – and limitations – of a medium both widely reproducible and constrained in its durability as a corporeal substitute.https://openartsjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/oaj_issue4_brisman.pdfDürerprintsSmall PassionNoli me tangereMary Magdalenindexicalityself-referentiality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shira Brisman
spellingShingle Shira Brisman
A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
The Open Arts Journal
Dürer
prints
Small Passion
Noli me tangere
Mary Magdalen
indexicality
self-referentiality
author_facet Shira Brisman
author_sort Shira Brisman
title A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
title_short A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
title_full A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
title_fullStr A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
title_full_unstemmed A touching compassion: Dürer’s haptic theology
title_sort touching compassion: dürer’s haptic theology
publisher The Open University
series The Open Arts Journal
issn 2050-3679
publishDate 2015-02-01
description In one of the final scenes of his 1511 woodcut sequence, The Small Passion, Albrecht Dürer depicts the newly risen Christ extending his forefinger towards the head of Mary Magdalen. As a moment of touching, the Noli me tangere belongs to a category of representations that attests to the indexical nature of Christ’s image. The stain of his face on Veronica’s cloth or the imprints of his feet on the mountain from which he ascended are testaments to his corporeal presence on earth. Throughout The Small Passion, Dürer expands the vocabulary of indexical transfer to a haptic theology and proves the suitability of prints as a language in which to tell the story of God’s mark on earth in the form of Christ. Yet, at the same time, subtle underminings of these moments of contact signal Christ’s touch as impermanent, a substitute for a more sustained embrace to come. In emphasising the transmission and dissemination of Christ’s contact through a visual vocabulary of touching, pressing, hugging and kissing, Dürer also finds a language with which to describe the process of printing itself and the power – and limitations – of a medium both widely reproducible and constrained in its durability as a corporeal substitute.
topic Dürer
prints
Small Passion
Noli me tangere
Mary Magdalen
indexicality
self-referentiality
url https://openartsjournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/oaj_issue4_brisman.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shirabrisman atouchingcompassiondurershaptictheology
AT shirabrisman touchingcompassiondurershaptictheology
_version_ 1725640252050112512