Response to David Temperley's Commentary
The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of...
Main Author: | William Thomson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Ohio State University Libraries
2006-09-01
|
Series: | Empirical Musicology Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066 |
Similar Items
-
Pitch Frames as Melodic Archetypes
by: William Thomson
Published: (2006-09-01) -
Commentary on William Thomson's "Pitch Frames as Melodic Archetypes"
by: David Temperley
Published: (2006-09-01) -
Familiar Tonal Context Improves Accuracy of Pitch Interval Perception
by: Jackson E. Graves, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01) -
The Melody of Speech: What the Melodic Perception of Speech Reveals about Language Performance and Musical Abilities
by: Markus Christiner, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Piano in the intonation process of tonally unstable and non-tonal melodies in teaching Solfège
by: Vidicki Elizabeta
Published: (2015-01-01)