Response to David Temperley's Commentary

The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	William Thomson
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	The Ohio State University Libraries 2006-09-01
Series:	Empirical Musicology Review
Subjects:	perception melody melodic harmony tonality form structure
Online Access:	https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066

id	doaj-208581b0217e4e0e8650d96a0813ad09
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-208581b0217e4e0e8650d96a0813ad092020-11-25T00:41:19ZengThe Ohio State University LibrariesEmpirical Musicology Review1559-57492006-09-011318218410.18061/1811/24066Response to David Temperley's CommentaryWilliam ThomsonThe author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of Carol Krumhansl and Fred Lerdahl.https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066perceptionmelodymelodicharmonytonalityformstructure
collection	DOAJ
language	English
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	William Thomson
spellingShingle	William Thomson Response to David Temperley's Commentary Empirical Musicology Review perception melody melodic harmony tonality form structure
author_facet	William Thomson
author_sort	William Thomson
title	Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_short	Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_full	Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_fullStr	Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_full_unstemmed	Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_sort	response to david temperley's commentary
publisher	The Ohio State University Libraries
series	Empirical Musicology Review
issn	1559-5749
publishDate	2006-09-01
description	The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of Carol Krumhansl and Fred Lerdahl.
topic	perception melody melodic harmony tonality form structure
url	https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066
work_keys_str_mv	AT williamthomson responsetodavidtemperleyscommentary
_version_	1725286033663197184

Response to David Temperley's Commentary

Similar Items