Response to David Temperley's Commentary
The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Ohio State University Libraries
2006-09-01
|
| Series: | Empirical Musicology Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066 |
| Summary: | The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of Carol Krumhansl and Fred Lerdahl. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1559-5749 |