Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program

Revision constitutes an important component of the writing process that integrates text interpretation, reflection, and production. Although previous studies have offered useful insights into the revision behaviour of L2 writers at different levels of proficiency using off-line measures, little is k...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diana Mazgutova*
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tayfun Yagar 2020-11-01
Series:International Journal of Educational Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access: https://ijem.com//IJEM_6_4_715.pdf
id doaj-206f96e0d743439ba4eb4f0ac91c961d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-206f96e0d743439ba4eb4f0ac91c961d2021-02-22T12:21:18ZengTayfun YagarInternational Journal of Educational Methodology2469-96322469-96322020-11-016471572710.12973/ijem.6.4.71515585Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes ProgramDiana Mazgutova*0 The University of Leeds Revision constitutes an important component of the writing process that integrates text interpretation, reflection, and production. Although previous studies have offered useful insights into the revision behaviour of L2 writers at different levels of proficiency using off-line measures, little is known about the online processes of revision. In this study, I used keystroke logging to investigate longitudinal changes in the revision processes of postgraduate and undergraduate students in the context of an intensive English for Academic Purposes (EAP) program. Twenty-five postgraduate and 14 undergraduate students participated in this study. The keystroke logging program Inputlog was used during two essay writing sessions at the beginning and at the end of the course to observe how the participants revise their essays and to get insights into their on-line writing processes. Keystroke logging data were coded in terms of the orientation and location of revisions. The results revealed that postgraduates produced more content-oriented revisions at the end of the programme than at the beginning. The opposite trend was observed for the undergraduates, who revised their essays significantly less frequently at the end than at the beginning of the EAP program and made more mechanical revisions than postgraduate writers. The findings highlight fundamental differences in the developmental trajectories of revision processes between postgraduate and undergraduate students. These differences caused by previous academic writing experience and language proficiency should be considered in developing materials for EAP programs. In the paper, I also discuss benefits of using keystroke logging to investigate L2 writers’ revision processes. https://ijem.com//IJEM_6_4_715.pdf revision behaviours writing process keystroke logging.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diana Mazgutova*
spellingShingle Diana Mazgutova*
Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program
International Journal of Educational Methodology
revision behaviours
writing process
keystroke logging.
author_facet Diana Mazgutova*
author_sort Diana Mazgutova*
title Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program
title_short Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program
title_full Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program
title_fullStr Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program
title_sort changes in revision behaviours of l2 writers in an intensive english for academic purposes program
publisher Tayfun Yagar
series International Journal of Educational Methodology
issn 2469-9632
2469-9632
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Revision constitutes an important component of the writing process that integrates text interpretation, reflection, and production. Although previous studies have offered useful insights into the revision behaviour of L2 writers at different levels of proficiency using off-line measures, little is known about the online processes of revision. In this study, I used keystroke logging to investigate longitudinal changes in the revision processes of postgraduate and undergraduate students in the context of an intensive English for Academic Purposes (EAP) program. Twenty-five postgraduate and 14 undergraduate students participated in this study. The keystroke logging program Inputlog was used during two essay writing sessions at the beginning and at the end of the course to observe how the participants revise their essays and to get insights into their on-line writing processes. Keystroke logging data were coded in terms of the orientation and location of revisions. The results revealed that postgraduates produced more content-oriented revisions at the end of the programme than at the beginning. The opposite trend was observed for the undergraduates, who revised their essays significantly less frequently at the end than at the beginning of the EAP program and made more mechanical revisions than postgraduate writers. The findings highlight fundamental differences in the developmental trajectories of revision processes between postgraduate and undergraduate students. These differences caused by previous academic writing experience and language proficiency should be considered in developing materials for EAP programs. In the paper, I also discuss benefits of using keystroke logging to investigate L2 writers’ revision processes.
topic revision behaviours
writing process
keystroke logging.
url https://ijem.com//IJEM_6_4_715.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dianamazgutova changesinrevisionbehavioursofl2writersinanintensiveenglishforacademicpurposesprogram
_version_ 1724256729947963392