EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND
Since the 1990s, the European Union is aspiring global leadership in the area of climate change, which is refl ected in its active participation in the negotiations on the international climate change regime. However, those ambitions have not always turned out to be appropriate or justifi ed. Despit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Jurist, Publishing Group
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/483 |
id |
doaj-205ecbad14cc46808a02d9fbd3a61dff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-205ecbad14cc46808a02d9fbd3a61dff2021-07-29T08:10:12ZengJurist, Publishing GroupSravnitelʹnaâ Politika2221-32792412-49902016-08-0173(24)718410.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-3(24)-71-84389EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYONDE. V. Savorskaya0Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, RussiaSince the 1990s, the European Union is aspiring global leadership in the area of climate change, which is refl ected in its active participation in the negotiations on the international climate change regime. However, those ambitions have not always turned out to be appropriate or justifi ed. Despite the fact that the European Union was able to achieve certain results during the Kyoto Protocol negotiations and even more signifi cant results in the process of its ratifi cation, for the most part EU negotiation strategy based on normative considerations, had not been successful, it was especially evident during the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Partly the disappointing results of EU performance during the Copenhagen negotiations are to be blamed on some of the key features of EU functioning logic, for example, the overall tendency to rely on scientifi c evidence in policy-making, which did not allow the EU to assess other parties’ interests adequately. As the results of the negotiations of parties to the UNFCCC in December 2015 in Paris have shown, the European Union did manage to work out its previous mistakes and build a broad informal international coalition. Contrary to the pessimistic expectations, the agreement was adopted and it took into account quite a few of the EU proposals. However, the Paris Treaty has a number of fl aws and inaccuracies, so the ability to eliminate them in a timely manner by the international community and the EU in particular, will determine the future of the new international climate change regime.https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/483european unioneuglobal governanceclimate changeinternational climatechange regimecopparis agreement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. V. Savorskaya |
spellingShingle |
E. V. Savorskaya EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika european union eu global governance climate change international climate change regime cop paris agreement |
author_facet |
E. V. Savorskaya |
author_sort |
E. V. Savorskaya |
title |
EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND |
title_short |
EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND |
title_full |
EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND |
title_fullStr |
EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND |
title_full_unstemmed |
EUROPEAN UNION IN GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: TO PARIS AND BEYOND |
title_sort |
european union in global climate governance: to paris and beyond |
publisher |
Jurist, Publishing Group |
series |
Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika |
issn |
2221-3279 2412-4990 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
Since the 1990s, the European Union is aspiring global leadership in the area of climate change, which is refl ected in its active participation in the negotiations on the international climate change regime. However, those ambitions have not always turned out to be appropriate or justifi ed. Despite the fact that the European Union was able to achieve certain results during the Kyoto Protocol negotiations and even more signifi cant results in the process of its ratifi cation, for the most part EU negotiation strategy based on normative considerations, had not been successful, it was especially evident during the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Partly the disappointing results of EU performance during the Copenhagen negotiations are to be blamed on some of the key features of EU functioning logic, for example, the overall tendency to rely on scientifi c evidence in policy-making, which did not allow the EU to assess other parties’ interests adequately. As the results of the negotiations of parties to the UNFCCC in December 2015 in Paris have shown, the European Union did manage to work out its previous mistakes and build a broad informal international coalition. Contrary to the pessimistic expectations, the agreement was adopted and it took into account quite a few of the EU proposals. However, the Paris Treaty has a number of fl aws and inaccuracies, so the ability to eliminate them in a timely manner by the international community and the EU in particular, will determine the future of the new international climate change regime. |
topic |
european union eu global governance climate change international climate change regime cop paris agreement |
url |
https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/483 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT evsavorskaya europeanunioninglobalclimategovernancetoparisandbeyond |
_version_ |
1721257547391827968 |