Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction

Summary: Background/objective: Patients with left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction require emergency treatment. Emergency stoma surgery has traditionally been recommended, however many stomas became permanent, decreasing patient quality of life. Recently, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Kawachi, Hiroyuki Kashiwagi, Rai Shimoyama, Naoko Isogai, Ryuta Fukai, Katsunori Miyake, Hideto Egashira, Ayumu Sugitani, Hidemitsu Ogino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-09-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958417302580
id doaj-205d77a24a4a46f6922a50be9ebc1713
record_format Article
spelling doaj-205d77a24a4a46f6922a50be9ebc17132020-11-25T01:29:37ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842018-09-01415498505Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstructionJun Kawachi0Hiroyuki Kashiwagi1Rai Shimoyama2Naoko Isogai3Ryuta Fukai4Katsunori Miyake5Hideto Egashira6Ayumu Sugitani7Hidemitsu Ogino8Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Japan; Corresponding author. Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan. Fax: +81 467 45 0190.Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, JapanShonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, JapanShonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, JapanShonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, JapanShonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, JapanShonan Kamakura General Hospital, Gastroenterology Center, JapanSapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Center for Clinical and Biomedical Research, JapanShonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Surgery, JapanSummary: Background/objective: Patients with left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction require emergency treatment. Emergency stoma surgery has traditionally been recommended, however many stomas became permanent, decreasing patient quality of life. Recently, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) and transanal decompression tubes (TDT) have become widely used decompression methods to avoid stoma surgery. In this study, we evaluated: 1) the efficacy of SEMS compared with TDT and emergency surgery (ES) to avoid permanent stomas; and 2) the safety and success rate of each treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 56 patients who underwent SEMS, TDT, or emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction. We compared the permanent stoma rate of each group, and assessed whether or not each treatment was an independent risk factor for permanent stomas. We compared morbidity and mortality for each treatment group (SEMS, TDT, ES), and the success rate of the decompression procedures (SEMS and TDT). Results: The permanent stoma rates in the SEMS, TDT, and ES groups were 5.3%, 50.0%, and 56.0%, respectively. Emergency surgery (vs. SEMS) and TDT (vs. SEMS) were independent risk factors for permanent stomas, as was age ≥ 75 years. Operative morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay were not different between groups. The success rate of SEMS was significantly higher than TDT; however, two deaths, including one perforation, occurred in the former group. Conclusion: SEMS seems to be effective in avoiding permanent stomas, but caution should be taken to avoid complications. Keywords: Emergency stoma surgery, Left-sided malignant colon obstruction, Self-expandable metallic stents, Transanal decompression tubeshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958417302580
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun Kawachi
Hiroyuki Kashiwagi
Rai Shimoyama
Naoko Isogai
Ryuta Fukai
Katsunori Miyake
Hideto Egashira
Ayumu Sugitani
Hidemitsu Ogino
spellingShingle Jun Kawachi
Hiroyuki Kashiwagi
Rai Shimoyama
Naoko Isogai
Ryuta Fukai
Katsunori Miyake
Hideto Egashira
Ayumu Sugitani
Hidemitsu Ogino
Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
Asian Journal of Surgery
author_facet Jun Kawachi
Hiroyuki Kashiwagi
Rai Shimoyama
Naoko Isogai
Ryuta Fukai
Katsunori Miyake
Hideto Egashira
Ayumu Sugitani
Hidemitsu Ogino
author_sort Jun Kawachi
title Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
title_short Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
title_full Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
title_sort comparison of efficacies of the self-expandable metallic stent versus transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Surgery
issn 1015-9584
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Summary: Background/objective: Patients with left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction require emergency treatment. Emergency stoma surgery has traditionally been recommended, however many stomas became permanent, decreasing patient quality of life. Recently, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) and transanal decompression tubes (TDT) have become widely used decompression methods to avoid stoma surgery. In this study, we evaluated: 1) the efficacy of SEMS compared with TDT and emergency surgery (ES) to avoid permanent stomas; and 2) the safety and success rate of each treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 56 patients who underwent SEMS, TDT, or emergency surgery for malignant left-sided colon obstruction. We compared the permanent stoma rate of each group, and assessed whether or not each treatment was an independent risk factor for permanent stomas. We compared morbidity and mortality for each treatment group (SEMS, TDT, ES), and the success rate of the decompression procedures (SEMS and TDT). Results: The permanent stoma rates in the SEMS, TDT, and ES groups were 5.3%, 50.0%, and 56.0%, respectively. Emergency surgery (vs. SEMS) and TDT (vs. SEMS) were independent risk factors for permanent stomas, as was age ≥ 75 years. Operative morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay were not different between groups. The success rate of SEMS was significantly higher than TDT; however, two deaths, including one perforation, occurred in the former group. Conclusion: SEMS seems to be effective in avoiding permanent stomas, but caution should be taken to avoid complications. Keywords: Emergency stoma surgery, Left-sided malignant colon obstruction, Self-expandable metallic stents, Transanal decompression tubes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958417302580
work_keys_str_mv AT junkawachi comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT hiroyukikashiwagi comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT raishimoyama comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT naokoisogai comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT ryutafukai comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT katsunorimiyake comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT hidetoegashira comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT ayumusugitani comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
AT hidemitsuogino comparisonofefficaciesoftheselfexpandablemetallicstentversustransanaldrainagetubeandemergencysurgeryformalignantleftsidedcolonobstruction
_version_ 1725096037741232128