Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection

Globally, states use state-owned companies (SOCs) or public corporations to provide public goods, limit private and foreign control of the domestic economy, generate public funds for the fiscus, increase service delivery and encourage economic development and industrialisation. Particularly given it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tebello, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2018-01-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
id doaj-205b2a610dbe41558dbb7ecff74c4e44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-205b2a610dbe41558dbb7ecff74c4e442020-11-25T03:05:33ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37811727-37812018-01-0121132http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2345Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical ReflectionTebello0Elizabeth1ThabaneSnyman van deventerGlobally, states use state-owned companies (SOCs) or public corporations to provide public goods, limit private and foreign control of the domestic economy, generate public funds for the fiscus, increase service delivery and encourage economic development and industrialisation. Particularly given its unique socio-political and economic dynamics, a country such as South Africa clearly needs this type of strategic enterprise. Yet, that does not mean that everything at our SOCs is as it should be. The beleaguered South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) has recently seen the resignation of board members, shareholder interference in its operational affairs, and a high turnover of chief accounting officers and other executive management members. Due to non-performance, it has also received several cash injections from its shareholder to enable it to continue to deliver its services. In addition, the shareholder minister took it upon herself to amend the SABC's memorandum of incorporation, conferring upon herself the authority to appoint, suspend or even dismiss key executive members. South African Airways (SAA), in turn, has had seven CEOs in less than four years, has had to be bailed out at a cost of R550 million, and has in addition been granted a R5 billion guarantee by the shareholder for a restructuring exercise. Other SOCs such as Eskom, the Post Office and Telkom have also experienced high board and executive management turnover, perennial underperformance necessitating regular bailouts, and challenges regarding the division of power between their boards and the various shareholder ministers. Another issue that seems to plague South Africa's SOCs is the appointment of board members and executive officials with questionable qualifications. By critically examining the corporate governance challenges besetting the SABC, SAA and Eskom in particular, this article seeks to explore the root causes of the corporate governance deficiencies of SOCs, and how their corporate governance can be enhanced. It is concluded that the challenges faced by the country's SOCs are twofold: firstly, the SOCs boards' lack of appreciation of the cardinal corporate governance rules, and secondly, the role of government as a single or dominant shareholder, which results in substantial political interference in the running of the SOCs. This dual problem requires a dual solution. To arrest the problem of poor corporate governance in SOCs, government as the shareholder should firstly appoint fit and proper directors, having followed a sound due-diligence process. Once it has established such properly skilled and competent boards, however, government should adopt an arm's-length approach to the affairs of the SOCs as a way of insulating these corporations from political interference.State-owned companies; corporate governance; deficiencies; South Africa; SAA; SABC; Eskom
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tebello
Elizabeth
spellingShingle Tebello
Elizabeth
Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
State-owned companies; corporate governance; deficiencies; South Africa; SAA; SABC; Eskom
author_facet Tebello
Elizabeth
author_sort Tebello
title Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection
title_short Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection
title_full Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection
title_fullStr Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection
title_full_unstemmed Pathological Corporate Governance Deficiencies in South Africa's State-Owned Companies: A Critical Reflection
title_sort pathological corporate governance deficiencies in south africa's state-owned companies: a critical reflection
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
1727-3781
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Globally, states use state-owned companies (SOCs) or public corporations to provide public goods, limit private and foreign control of the domestic economy, generate public funds for the fiscus, increase service delivery and encourage economic development and industrialisation. Particularly given its unique socio-political and economic dynamics, a country such as South Africa clearly needs this type of strategic enterprise. Yet, that does not mean that everything at our SOCs is as it should be. The beleaguered South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) has recently seen the resignation of board members, shareholder interference in its operational affairs, and a high turnover of chief accounting officers and other executive management members. Due to non-performance, it has also received several cash injections from its shareholder to enable it to continue to deliver its services. In addition, the shareholder minister took it upon herself to amend the SABC's memorandum of incorporation, conferring upon herself the authority to appoint, suspend or even dismiss key executive members. South African Airways (SAA), in turn, has had seven CEOs in less than four years, has had to be bailed out at a cost of R550 million, and has in addition been granted a R5 billion guarantee by the shareholder for a restructuring exercise. Other SOCs such as Eskom, the Post Office and Telkom have also experienced high board and executive management turnover, perennial underperformance necessitating regular bailouts, and challenges regarding the division of power between their boards and the various shareholder ministers. Another issue that seems to plague South Africa's SOCs is the appointment of board members and executive officials with questionable qualifications. By critically examining the corporate governance challenges besetting the SABC, SAA and Eskom in particular, this article seeks to explore the root causes of the corporate governance deficiencies of SOCs, and how their corporate governance can be enhanced. It is concluded that the challenges faced by the country's SOCs are twofold: firstly, the SOCs boards' lack of appreciation of the cardinal corporate governance rules, and secondly, the role of government as a single or dominant shareholder, which results in substantial political interference in the running of the SOCs. This dual problem requires a dual solution. To arrest the problem of poor corporate governance in SOCs, government as the shareholder should firstly appoint fit and proper directors, having followed a sound due-diligence process. Once it has established such properly skilled and competent boards, however, government should adopt an arm's-length approach to the affairs of the SOCs as a way of insulating these corporations from political interference.
topic State-owned companies; corporate governance; deficiencies; South Africa; SAA; SABC; Eskom
work_keys_str_mv AT tebello pathologicalcorporategovernancedeficienciesinsouthafricasstateownedcompaniesacriticalreflection
AT elizabeth pathologicalcorporategovernancedeficienciesinsouthafricasstateownedcompaniesacriticalreflection
_version_ 1724677880900747264