Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To study the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with radiosensitizer in comparison with WBRT alone for patients with brain metastases in terms of overall survival, disease progression, response to treatment and adverse effects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viani Gustavo, Manta Gustavo, Fonseca Ellen, De fendi Ligia, Afonso Sergio, Stefano Eduardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Online Access:http://www.jeccr.com/content/28/1/1
id doaj-2054113cc35b4b1392bcae1616703b15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2054113cc35b4b1392bcae1616703b152020-11-24T20:54:42ZengBMCJournal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research1756-99662009-01-01281110.1186/1756-9966-28-1Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastasesViani GustavoManta GustavoFonseca EllenDe fendi LigiaAfonso SergioStefano Eduardo<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To study the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with radiosensitizer in comparison with WBRT alone for patients with brain metastases in terms of overall survival, disease progression, response to treatment and adverse effects of treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was performed in order to compare WBRT with radiosensitizer for brain metastases and WBRT alone. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases, in addition to Trial registers, bibliographic databases, and recent issues of relevant journals were researched. Significant reports were reviewed by two reviewers independently.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 8 RCTs, yielding 2317 patients were analyzed. Pooled results from this 8 RCTs of WBRT with radiosensitizer have not shown a meaningful improvement on overall survival compared to WBRT alone OR = 1.03 (95% CI0.84–1.25, p = 0.77). Also, there was no difference in local brain tumor response OR = 0.8(95% CI 0.5 – 1.03) and brain tumor progression (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.9 – 1.3) when the two arms were compared.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our data show that WBRT with the following radiosentizers (ionidamine, metronidazole, misonodazole, motexafin gadolinium, BUdr, efaproxiral, thalidomide), have not improved significatively the overall survival, local control and tumor response compared to WBRT alone for brain metastases. However, 2 of them, motexafin- gadolinium and efaproxiral have been shown in recent publications (lung and breast) to have positive action in lung and breast carcinoma brain metastases in association with WBRT.</p> http://www.jeccr.com/content/28/1/1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Viani Gustavo
Manta Gustavo
Fonseca Ellen
De fendi Ligia
Afonso Sergio
Stefano Eduardo
spellingShingle Viani Gustavo
Manta Gustavo
Fonseca Ellen
De fendi Ligia
Afonso Sergio
Stefano Eduardo
Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
author_facet Viani Gustavo
Manta Gustavo
Fonseca Ellen
De fendi Ligia
Afonso Sergio
Stefano Eduardo
author_sort Viani Gustavo
title Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
title_short Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
title_full Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
title_fullStr Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
title_full_unstemmed Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
title_sort whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases
publisher BMC
series Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
issn 1756-9966
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To study the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with radiosensitizer in comparison with WBRT alone for patients with brain metastases in terms of overall survival, disease progression, response to treatment and adverse effects of treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was performed in order to compare WBRT with radiosensitizer for brain metastases and WBRT alone. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases, in addition to Trial registers, bibliographic databases, and recent issues of relevant journals were researched. Significant reports were reviewed by two reviewers independently.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 8 RCTs, yielding 2317 patients were analyzed. Pooled results from this 8 RCTs of WBRT with radiosensitizer have not shown a meaningful improvement on overall survival compared to WBRT alone OR = 1.03 (95% CI0.84–1.25, p = 0.77). Also, there was no difference in local brain tumor response OR = 0.8(95% CI 0.5 – 1.03) and brain tumor progression (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.9 – 1.3) when the two arms were compared.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our data show that WBRT with the following radiosentizers (ionidamine, metronidazole, misonodazole, motexafin gadolinium, BUdr, efaproxiral, thalidomide), have not improved significatively the overall survival, local control and tumor response compared to WBRT alone for brain metastases. However, 2 of them, motexafin- gadolinium and efaproxiral have been shown in recent publications (lung and breast) to have positive action in lung and breast carcinoma brain metastases in association with WBRT.</p>
url http://www.jeccr.com/content/28/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT vianigustavo wholebrainradiotherapywithradiosensitizerforbrainmetastases
AT mantagustavo wholebrainradiotherapywithradiosensitizerforbrainmetastases
AT fonsecaellen wholebrainradiotherapywithradiosensitizerforbrainmetastases
AT defendiligia wholebrainradiotherapywithradiosensitizerforbrainmetastases
AT afonsosergio wholebrainradiotherapywithradiosensitizerforbrainmetastases
AT stefanoeduardo wholebrainradiotherapywithradiosensitizerforbrainmetastases
_version_ 1716793590955376640