Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers

Abstract In recent years, electrical myostimulation (EMS) is becoming more and more popular to increase muscle function and muscle weight. Especially it is applied in healthy individual after injury to rebuild muscle mass and in severely atrophic patients who are not able or willing to perform conve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Volker Adams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-08-01
Series:Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12332
id doaj-204e5524a13048329badce76837821de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-204e5524a13048329badce76837821de2020-11-24T21:52:04ZengWileyJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle2190-59912190-60092018-08-019463163410.1002/jcsm.12332Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbersVolker Adams0Department of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden Dresden GermanyAbstract In recent years, electrical myostimulation (EMS) is becoming more and more popular to increase muscle function and muscle weight. Especially it is applied in healthy individual after injury to rebuild muscle mass and in severely atrophic patients who are not able or willing to perform conventional exercise training programs. Studies in experimental models as well as in human subjects confirmed that EMS can increase muscle mass by around 1% and improve muscle function by around 10–15% after 5–6 weeks of treatment. Despite a severe increase in circulating creatine kinase during the first session, EMS can be regarded as a safe therapeutic intervention. At the molecular level, EMS improves the anabolic/catabolic balance and stimulates the regenerative capacity of satellite cells. EMS intensity should be as high as individually tolerated, and a minimum of three sessions per week [large pulses (between 300–450 μs), high frequency (50–100 Hz in young and around 30 Hz in older individuals)] for at least 5–6 weeks should be performed. EMS improved functional performances more effectively than voluntary training and counteracted fast type muscle fibre atrophy, typically associated with sarcopenia. The effect of superimposing EMS on conventional exercise training to achieve more muscle mass and better function is still discussed controversially. Nevertheless, EMS should not be regarded as a replacement of exercise training per se, since the beneficial effect of exercise training is not just relying on building muscle mass but it also exerts positive effects on endothelial, myocardial, and cognitive function.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12332Muscle atrophymuscle functionelectrical stimulationexercise trainingmolecular mechanisms
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Volker Adams
spellingShingle Volker Adams
Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Muscle atrophy
muscle function
electrical stimulation
exercise training
molecular mechanisms
author_facet Volker Adams
author_sort Volker Adams
title Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
title_short Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
title_full Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
title_fullStr Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
title_full_unstemmed Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
title_sort electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
issn 2190-5991
2190-6009
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Abstract In recent years, electrical myostimulation (EMS) is becoming more and more popular to increase muscle function and muscle weight. Especially it is applied in healthy individual after injury to rebuild muscle mass and in severely atrophic patients who are not able or willing to perform conventional exercise training programs. Studies in experimental models as well as in human subjects confirmed that EMS can increase muscle mass by around 1% and improve muscle function by around 10–15% after 5–6 weeks of treatment. Despite a severe increase in circulating creatine kinase during the first session, EMS can be regarded as a safe therapeutic intervention. At the molecular level, EMS improves the anabolic/catabolic balance and stimulates the regenerative capacity of satellite cells. EMS intensity should be as high as individually tolerated, and a minimum of three sessions per week [large pulses (between 300–450 μs), high frequency (50–100 Hz in young and around 30 Hz in older individuals)] for at least 5–6 weeks should be performed. EMS improved functional performances more effectively than voluntary training and counteracted fast type muscle fibre atrophy, typically associated with sarcopenia. The effect of superimposing EMS on conventional exercise training to achieve more muscle mass and better function is still discussed controversially. Nevertheless, EMS should not be regarded as a replacement of exercise training per se, since the beneficial effect of exercise training is not just relying on building muscle mass but it also exerts positive effects on endothelial, myocardial, and cognitive function.
topic Muscle atrophy
muscle function
electrical stimulation
exercise training
molecular mechanisms
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12332
work_keys_str_mv AT volkeradams electromyostimulationtofightatrophyandtobuildmusclefactsandnumbers
_version_ 1725877072362995712