The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia

The existing scholarship in nomadic-sedentary relations has focused on the raids and invasions by nomads against agricultural society, and has attempted to seek internal reasons for this within the nomadic society. Interactive Ming- Mongol history along the Great Wall in the sixteenth century indica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Temur Temule
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea University, Center for Korean History 2016-02-01
Series:International Journal of Korean History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-121.pdf
id doaj-204cd8d4d33b4df88dfc486da435e5e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-204cd8d4d33b4df88dfc486da435e5e52020-11-25T00:30:53ZengKorea University, Center for Korean HistoryInternational Journal of Korean History1598-20412016-02-0121112115510.22372/ijkh.2016.21.1.12113The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner AsiaTemur Temule0Associate Professor, College of History, Nanjing UniversityThe existing scholarship in nomadic-sedentary relations has focused on the raids and invasions by nomads against agricultural society, and has attempted to seek internal reasons for this within the nomadic society. Interactive Ming- Mongol history along the Great Wall in the sixteenth century indicates that the agricultural society was also capable of offense. Many raids conducted by nomads were actually revenge for the provocation and raids by the agricultural society, hence they were retaliatory raids. Nomadic-sedentary groups interacted along the Great Wall area; therefore, scholars should turn their attention to this area rather than exclusively search for reasons from internal factors of nomadic society. The razzias upon the Mongols beyond the Great Wall by Ming generals and their retainers have shown that sedentary society were in need of horses, cattle, meat, wool, hides, etc. Ming China’s big market for the nomadic goods drove Ming generals and their retainers to do the profitable, risky, but provocative forays against the Mongols in 16th century.http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-121.pdfRetainersMing-Mongol RelationsNomadic-Sedentary RelationsRetaliative Raid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Temur Temule
spellingShingle Temur Temule
The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
International Journal of Korean History
Retainers
Ming-Mongol Relations
Nomadic-Sedentary Relations
Retaliative Raid
author_facet Temur Temule
author_sort Temur Temule
title The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
title_short The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
title_full The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
title_fullStr The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
title_full_unstemmed The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
title_sort great wall as perilous frontier for the mongols in 16th century: reconsidering nomadic-sedentary relations in premodern inner asia
publisher Korea University, Center for Korean History
series International Journal of Korean History
issn 1598-2041
publishDate 2016-02-01
description The existing scholarship in nomadic-sedentary relations has focused on the raids and invasions by nomads against agricultural society, and has attempted to seek internal reasons for this within the nomadic society. Interactive Ming- Mongol history along the Great Wall in the sixteenth century indicates that the agricultural society was also capable of offense. Many raids conducted by nomads were actually revenge for the provocation and raids by the agricultural society, hence they were retaliatory raids. Nomadic-sedentary groups interacted along the Great Wall area; therefore, scholars should turn their attention to this area rather than exclusively search for reasons from internal factors of nomadic society. The razzias upon the Mongols beyond the Great Wall by Ming generals and their retainers have shown that sedentary society were in need of horses, cattle, meat, wool, hides, etc. Ming China’s big market for the nomadic goods drove Ming generals and their retainers to do the profitable, risky, but provocative forays against the Mongols in 16th century.
topic Retainers
Ming-Mongol Relations
Nomadic-Sedentary Relations
Retaliative Raid
url http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-121.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT temurtemule thegreatwallasperilousfrontierforthemongolsin16thcenturyreconsideringnomadicsedentaryrelationsinpremoderninnerasia
AT temurtemule greatwallasperilousfrontierforthemongolsin16thcenturyreconsideringnomadicsedentaryrelationsinpremoderninnerasia
_version_ 1725325093326815232