The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia
The existing scholarship in nomadic-sedentary relations has focused on the raids and invasions by nomads against agricultural society, and has attempted to seek internal reasons for this within the nomadic society. Interactive Ming- Mongol history along the Great Wall in the sixteenth century indica...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korea University, Center for Korean History
2016-02-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Korean History |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-121.pdf |
id |
doaj-204cd8d4d33b4df88dfc486da435e5e5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-204cd8d4d33b4df88dfc486da435e5e52020-11-25T00:30:53ZengKorea University, Center for Korean HistoryInternational Journal of Korean History1598-20412016-02-0121112115510.22372/ijkh.2016.21.1.12113The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner AsiaTemur Temule0Associate Professor, College of History, Nanjing UniversityThe existing scholarship in nomadic-sedentary relations has focused on the raids and invasions by nomads against agricultural society, and has attempted to seek internal reasons for this within the nomadic society. Interactive Ming- Mongol history along the Great Wall in the sixteenth century indicates that the agricultural society was also capable of offense. Many raids conducted by nomads were actually revenge for the provocation and raids by the agricultural society, hence they were retaliatory raids. Nomadic-sedentary groups interacted along the Great Wall area; therefore, scholars should turn their attention to this area rather than exclusively search for reasons from internal factors of nomadic society. The razzias upon the Mongols beyond the Great Wall by Ming generals and their retainers have shown that sedentary society were in need of horses, cattle, meat, wool, hides, etc. Ming China’s big market for the nomadic goods drove Ming generals and their retainers to do the profitable, risky, but provocative forays against the Mongols in 16th century.http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-121.pdfRetainersMing-Mongol RelationsNomadic-Sedentary RelationsRetaliative Raid |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Temur Temule |
spellingShingle |
Temur Temule The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia International Journal of Korean History Retainers Ming-Mongol Relations Nomadic-Sedentary Relations Retaliative Raid |
author_facet |
Temur Temule |
author_sort |
Temur Temule |
title |
The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia |
title_short |
The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia |
title_full |
The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia |
title_fullStr |
The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Great Wall as Perilous Frontier for the Mongols in 16th Century: Reconsidering Nomadic-Sedentary Relations in Premodern Inner Asia |
title_sort |
great wall as perilous frontier for the mongols in 16th century: reconsidering nomadic-sedentary relations in premodern inner asia |
publisher |
Korea University, Center for Korean History |
series |
International Journal of Korean History |
issn |
1598-2041 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
The existing scholarship in nomadic-sedentary relations has focused on the raids and invasions by nomads against agricultural society, and has attempted to seek internal reasons for this within the nomadic society. Interactive Ming- Mongol history along the Great Wall in the sixteenth century indicates that the agricultural society was also capable of offense. Many raids conducted by nomads were actually revenge for the provocation and raids by the agricultural society, hence they were retaliatory raids. Nomadic-sedentary groups interacted along the Great Wall area; therefore, scholars should turn their attention to this area rather than exclusively search for reasons from internal factors of nomadic society. The razzias upon the Mongols beyond the Great Wall by Ming generals and their retainers have shown that sedentary society were in need of horses, cattle, meat, wool, hides, etc. Ming China’s big market for the nomadic goods drove Ming generals and their retainers to do the profitable, risky, but provocative forays against the Mongols in 16th century. |
topic |
Retainers Ming-Mongol Relations Nomadic-Sedentary Relations Retaliative Raid |
url |
http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-121.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT temurtemule thegreatwallasperilousfrontierforthemongolsin16thcenturyreconsideringnomadicsedentaryrelationsinpremoderninnerasia AT temurtemule greatwallasperilousfrontierforthemongolsin16thcenturyreconsideringnomadicsedentaryrelationsinpremoderninnerasia |
_version_ |
1725325093326815232 |