Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court

This article explores the gaps left by the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence in relation to what the appropriate internal appeal mechanism should be at the level of municipalities for the approval of building plans. This follows the unanimous judgment of the Constitutional Court in City of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ngwako Raboshakga, Oliver Fuo
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2020-09-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/7938
id doaj-203ba137310a429ea41605dc422c7fbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-203ba137310a429ea41605dc422c7fbb2020-11-25T04:02:22ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812020-09-012310.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a7938Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional CourtNgwako Raboshakga 0Oliver Fuo1North-West University South AfricaFaculty of Law at the North-West University This article explores the gaps left by the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence in relation to what the appropriate internal appeal mechanism should be at the level of municipalities for the approval of building plans. This follows the unanimous judgment of the Constitutional Court in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Chairman of the National Building Regulations Review Board 2018 5 SA 1 (CC) in which the Court found section 9 of the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act 103 of 1977 (NBR Act), subjecting municipal building decisions to appeal by a "Review Board" appointed by the Minister of Trade and Industry, to be inconsistent with the original constitutional powers of municipalities over planning and building regulations. We argue that although the ground for holding section 9 of the NBR Act unconstitutional is already deeply entrenched in the Court's planning jurisprudence, the judgment has left a whopping gap on where prospective/future appeals can be lodged and the nature of such an appeal mechanism, where municipal officials disapprove building plans in terms of section 7 of the NBR Act. It is submitted that the invalidation of section 9 by the Court has completely left it up to each individual municipality to decide on whether and how an internal appeal for the approval of building plans is to be pursued. After exploring the options available in terms of other local government legislation, we argue that the most appropriate way to close the gap left by the Court is for Parliament to enact an amendment to the NBR Act providing for an internal appeal mechanism that allows for a measure of coherence and uniformity across municipalities, and yet respects the autonomy of local government. https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/7938South African municipalitiesbuilding regulationsexclusive executive powersbuilding plansreview of municipal decisions
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ngwako Raboshakga
Oliver Fuo
spellingShingle Ngwako Raboshakga
Oliver Fuo
Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
South African municipalities
building regulations
exclusive executive powers
building plans
review of municipal decisions
author_facet Ngwako Raboshakga
Oliver Fuo
author_sort Ngwako Raboshakga
title Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court
title_short Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court
title_full Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court
title_fullStr Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate Internal Appeal Mechanisms for Approval of Building Plans: Exploring the Gaps Left by the Constitutional Court
title_sort appropriate internal appeal mechanisms for approval of building plans: exploring the gaps left by the constitutional court
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This article explores the gaps left by the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence in relation to what the appropriate internal appeal mechanism should be at the level of municipalities for the approval of building plans. This follows the unanimous judgment of the Constitutional Court in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Chairman of the National Building Regulations Review Board 2018 5 SA 1 (CC) in which the Court found section 9 of the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act 103 of 1977 (NBR Act), subjecting municipal building decisions to appeal by a "Review Board" appointed by the Minister of Trade and Industry, to be inconsistent with the original constitutional powers of municipalities over planning and building regulations. We argue that although the ground for holding section 9 of the NBR Act unconstitutional is already deeply entrenched in the Court's planning jurisprudence, the judgment has left a whopping gap on where prospective/future appeals can be lodged and the nature of such an appeal mechanism, where municipal officials disapprove building plans in terms of section 7 of the NBR Act. It is submitted that the invalidation of section 9 by the Court has completely left it up to each individual municipality to decide on whether and how an internal appeal for the approval of building plans is to be pursued. After exploring the options available in terms of other local government legislation, we argue that the most appropriate way to close the gap left by the Court is for Parliament to enact an amendment to the NBR Act providing for an internal appeal mechanism that allows for a measure of coherence and uniformity across municipalities, and yet respects the autonomy of local government.
topic South African municipalities
building regulations
exclusive executive powers
building plans
review of municipal decisions
url https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/7938
work_keys_str_mv AT ngwakoraboshakga appropriateinternalappealmechanismsforapprovalofbuildingplansexploringthegapsleftbytheconstitutionalcourt
AT oliverfuo appropriateinternalappealmechanismsforapprovalofbuildingplansexploringthegapsleftbytheconstitutionalcourt
_version_ 1724443279483731968