Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation

Abstract Background External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meizhen Guo, Yuxi Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00569-9
id doaj-202b0dce1c8c4c8cbbf918f92fbdbf1e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-202b0dce1c8c4c8cbbf918f92fbdbf1e2021-03-11T12:54:44ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology1590-99211590-99992021-02-012211610.1186/s10195-021-00569-9Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixationMeizhen Guo0Yuxi Su1Department II of Orthopedics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, The Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment II of Orthopedics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, The Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityAbstract Background External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refracture after the removal of external fixation devices and decrease the frequency of refracture. Materials and methods Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 165 patients treated at our hospital for fresh femoral shaft fractures with external fixation between May 2009 and February 2018 were included in this study. Patients with pathological fractures, fractures of the femoral neck, fractures that were fixed using plates or elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and old fractures, as well as those who underwent postoperative femoral surgery were excluded. Potential risk factors included: patient age, gender, and weight, fracture sides, open or closed fracture, fracture sites, reduction methods, operation time, perioperative bleeding, number and diameter of the screws, and immobilization time. These factors were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results Femoral shaft refracture developed in 24 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that refracture was not statistically significantly associated with any of the above factors, except AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio (L2, length of femur fixed by the two screws farthest from the fracture line; L3, the total length from the greater trochanter to the distal end of femur; P < 0.001 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were also independent risk factors for femoral refracture. Conclusions Femoral shaft refracture is relatively common in children treated with external fixation. Because of the limited number of cases in this study, we cautiously concluded that the PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were independent risk factors for femoral shaft refracture in these patients. Level of evidence IVhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00569-9Femoral refractureExternal fixationChildren
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meizhen Guo
Yuxi Su
spellingShingle Meizhen Guo
Yuxi Su
Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Femoral refracture
External fixation
Children
author_facet Meizhen Guo
Yuxi Su
author_sort Meizhen Guo
title Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
title_short Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
title_full Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
title_fullStr Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
title_sort risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
issn 1590-9921
1590-9999
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Background External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refracture after the removal of external fixation devices and decrease the frequency of refracture. Materials and methods Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 165 patients treated at our hospital for fresh femoral shaft fractures with external fixation between May 2009 and February 2018 were included in this study. Patients with pathological fractures, fractures of the femoral neck, fractures that were fixed using plates or elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and old fractures, as well as those who underwent postoperative femoral surgery were excluded. Potential risk factors included: patient age, gender, and weight, fracture sides, open or closed fracture, fracture sites, reduction methods, operation time, perioperative bleeding, number and diameter of the screws, and immobilization time. These factors were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results Femoral shaft refracture developed in 24 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that refracture was not statistically significantly associated with any of the above factors, except AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio (L2, length of femur fixed by the two screws farthest from the fracture line; L3, the total length from the greater trochanter to the distal end of femur; P < 0.001 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were also independent risk factors for femoral refracture. Conclusions Femoral shaft refracture is relatively common in children treated with external fixation. Because of the limited number of cases in this study, we cautiously concluded that the PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were independent risk factors for femoral shaft refracture in these patients. Level of evidence IV
topic Femoral refracture
External fixation
Children
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00569-9
work_keys_str_mv AT meizhenguo riskfactorsforrefractureofthefemoralshaftinchildrenafterremovalofexternalfixation
AT yuxisu riskfactorsforrefractureofthefemoralshaftinchildrenafterremovalofexternalfixation
_version_ 1724223790333820928