Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions

Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of the influence of task demands on the processing of happy, sad, and fearful expressions were investigated in a within-subjects study that compared a perceptual distraction condition with task-irrelevant faces (e.g., covert emotion task) to an emotion...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Maffei, Jennifer Goertzen, Fern Jaspers-Fayer, Killian Kleffner, Paola Sessa, Mario Liotti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
EPN
LPP
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/7/942
id doaj-200ddc99290d439896c675080f416582
record_format Article
spelling doaj-200ddc99290d439896c675080f4165822021-07-23T13:32:58ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-07-011194294210.3390/brainsci11070942Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial ExpressionsAntonio Maffei0Jennifer Goertzen1Fern Jaspers-Fayer2Killian Kleffner3Paola Sessa4Mario Liotti5Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyLaboratory of Affective and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A1S6, CanadaLaboratory of Affective and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A1S6, CanadaLaboratory of Affective and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A1S6, CanadaDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyBehavioral and electrophysiological correlates of the influence of task demands on the processing of happy, sad, and fearful expressions were investigated in a within-subjects study that compared a perceptual distraction condition with task-irrelevant faces (e.g., covert emotion task) to an emotion task-relevant categorization condition (e.g., overt emotion task). A state-of-the-art non-parametric mass univariate analysis method was used to address the limitations of previous studies. Behaviorally, participants responded faster to overtly categorized happy faces and were slower and less accurate to categorize sad and fearful faces; there were no behavioral differences in the covert task. Event-related potential (ERP) responses to the emotional expressions included the N170 (140–180 ms), which was enhanced by emotion irrespective of task, with happy and sad expressions eliciting greater amplitudes than neutral expressions. EPN (200–400 ms) amplitude was modulated by task, with greater voltages in the overt condition, and by emotion, however, there was no interaction of emotion and task. ERP activity was modulated by emotion as a function of task only at a late processing stage, which included the LPP (500–800 ms), with fearful and sad faces showing greater amplitude enhancements than happy faces. This study reveals that affective content does not necessarily require attention in the early stages of face processing, supporting recent evidence that the core and extended parts of the face processing system act in parallel, rather than serially. The role of voluntary attention starts at an intermediate stage, and fully modulates the response to emotional content in the final stage of processing.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/7/942emotionattentionERPsN170EPNLPP
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonio Maffei
Jennifer Goertzen
Fern Jaspers-Fayer
Killian Kleffner
Paola Sessa
Mario Liotti
spellingShingle Antonio Maffei
Jennifer Goertzen
Fern Jaspers-Fayer
Killian Kleffner
Paola Sessa
Mario Liotti
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
Brain Sciences
emotion
attention
ERPs
N170
EPN
LPP
author_facet Antonio Maffei
Jennifer Goertzen
Fern Jaspers-Fayer
Killian Kleffner
Paola Sessa
Mario Liotti
author_sort Antonio Maffei
title Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
title_short Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
title_full Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions
title_sort spatiotemporal dynamics of covert versus overt processing of happy, fearful and sad facial expressions
publisher MDPI AG
series Brain Sciences
issn 2076-3425
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of the influence of task demands on the processing of happy, sad, and fearful expressions were investigated in a within-subjects study that compared a perceptual distraction condition with task-irrelevant faces (e.g., covert emotion task) to an emotion task-relevant categorization condition (e.g., overt emotion task). A state-of-the-art non-parametric mass univariate analysis method was used to address the limitations of previous studies. Behaviorally, participants responded faster to overtly categorized happy faces and were slower and less accurate to categorize sad and fearful faces; there were no behavioral differences in the covert task. Event-related potential (ERP) responses to the emotional expressions included the N170 (140–180 ms), which was enhanced by emotion irrespective of task, with happy and sad expressions eliciting greater amplitudes than neutral expressions. EPN (200–400 ms) amplitude was modulated by task, with greater voltages in the overt condition, and by emotion, however, there was no interaction of emotion and task. ERP activity was modulated by emotion as a function of task only at a late processing stage, which included the LPP (500–800 ms), with fearful and sad faces showing greater amplitude enhancements than happy faces. This study reveals that affective content does not necessarily require attention in the early stages of face processing, supporting recent evidence that the core and extended parts of the face processing system act in parallel, rather than serially. The role of voluntary attention starts at an intermediate stage, and fully modulates the response to emotional content in the final stage of processing.
topic emotion
attention
ERPs
N170
EPN
LPP
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/7/942
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniomaffei spatiotemporaldynamicsofcovertversusovertprocessingofhappyfearfulandsadfacialexpressions
AT jennifergoertzen spatiotemporaldynamicsofcovertversusovertprocessingofhappyfearfulandsadfacialexpressions
AT fernjaspersfayer spatiotemporaldynamicsofcovertversusovertprocessingofhappyfearfulandsadfacialexpressions
AT killiankleffner spatiotemporaldynamicsofcovertversusovertprocessingofhappyfearfulandsadfacialexpressions
AT paolasessa spatiotemporaldynamicsofcovertversusovertprocessingofhappyfearfulandsadfacialexpressions
AT marioliotti spatiotemporaldynamicsofcovertversusovertprocessingofhappyfearfulandsadfacialexpressions
_version_ 1721289179194720256