Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
Any trust situation involves a certain amount of risk for trustors that trustees could abuse. In some cases, intermediaries exist who play a crucial role in the exchange by providing reputational information. To examine under what conditions intermediary opinion could have a positive impact on coope...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Applied Mathematics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528 |
id |
doaj-1ffdb7f0195348c78ce4c21adf444428 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1ffdb7f0195348c78ce4c21adf4444282020-11-24T20:57:43ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Applied Mathematics1110-757X1687-00422015-01-01201510.1155/2015/234528234528Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and NormsGiangiacomo Bravo0Flaminio Squazzoni1Károly Takács2Department of Social Studies, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 35195 Växjö, SwedenDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Via San Faustino 74B, 25122 Brescia, ItalyMTA TK Lendület Research Center for Educational and Network Studies (RECENS), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Országház Utca 30, Budapest 1014, HungaryAny trust situation involves a certain amount of risk for trustors that trustees could abuse. In some cases, intermediaries exist who play a crucial role in the exchange by providing reputational information. To examine under what conditions intermediary opinion could have a positive impact on cooperation, we designed two experiments based on a modified version of the investment game where intermediaries rated the behaviour of trustees under various incentive schemes and different role structures. We found that intermediaries can increase trust if there is room for indirect reciprocity between the involved parties. We also found that the effect of monetary incentives and social norms cannot be clearly separable in these situations. If properly designed, monetary incentives for intermediaries can have a positive effect. On the one hand, when intermediary rewards are aligned with the trustor’s interest, investments and returns tend to increase. On the other hand, fixed monetary incentives perform less than any other incentive schemes and endogenous social norms in ensuring trust and fairness. These findings should make us reconsider the mantra of incentivization of social and public conventional policy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giangiacomo Bravo Flaminio Squazzoni Károly Takács |
spellingShingle |
Giangiacomo Bravo Flaminio Squazzoni Károly Takács Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms Journal of Applied Mathematics |
author_facet |
Giangiacomo Bravo Flaminio Squazzoni Károly Takács |
author_sort |
Giangiacomo Bravo |
title |
Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms |
title_short |
Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms |
title_full |
Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms |
title_fullStr |
Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms |
title_sort |
intermediaries in trust: indirect reciprocity, incentives, and norms |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Applied Mathematics |
issn |
1110-757X 1687-0042 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Any trust situation involves a certain amount of risk for trustors that trustees could abuse. In some cases, intermediaries exist who play a crucial role in the exchange by providing reputational information. To examine under what conditions intermediary opinion could have a positive impact on cooperation, we designed two experiments based on a modified version of the investment game where intermediaries rated the behaviour of trustees under various incentive schemes and different role structures. We found that intermediaries can increase trust if there is room for indirect reciprocity between the involved parties. We also found that the effect of monetary incentives and social norms cannot be clearly separable in these situations. If properly designed, monetary incentives for intermediaries can have a positive effect. On the one hand, when intermediary rewards are aligned with the trustor’s interest, investments and returns tend to increase. On the other hand, fixed monetary incentives perform less than any other incentive schemes and endogenous social norms in ensuring trust and fairness. These findings should make us reconsider the mantra of incentivization of social and public conventional policy. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giangiacomobravo intermediariesintrustindirectreciprocityincentivesandnorms AT flaminiosquazzoni intermediariesintrustindirectreciprocityincentivesandnorms AT karolytakacs intermediariesintrustindirectreciprocityincentivesandnorms |
_version_ |
1716787806847631360 |