Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms

Any trust situation involves a certain amount of risk for trustors that trustees could abuse. In some cases, intermediaries exist who play a crucial role in the exchange by providing reputational information. To examine under what conditions intermediary opinion could have a positive impact on coope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giangiacomo Bravo, Flaminio Squazzoni, Károly Takács
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Mathematics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528
id doaj-1ffdb7f0195348c78ce4c21adf444428
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ffdb7f0195348c78ce4c21adf4444282020-11-24T20:57:43ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Applied Mathematics1110-757X1687-00422015-01-01201510.1155/2015/234528234528Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and NormsGiangiacomo Bravo0Flaminio Squazzoni1Károly Takács2Department of Social Studies, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 35195 Växjö, SwedenDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Via San Faustino 74B, 25122 Brescia, ItalyMTA TK Lendület Research Center for Educational and Network Studies (RECENS), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Országház Utca 30, Budapest 1014, HungaryAny trust situation involves a certain amount of risk for trustors that trustees could abuse. In some cases, intermediaries exist who play a crucial role in the exchange by providing reputational information. To examine under what conditions intermediary opinion could have a positive impact on cooperation, we designed two experiments based on a modified version of the investment game where intermediaries rated the behaviour of trustees under various incentive schemes and different role structures. We found that intermediaries can increase trust if there is room for indirect reciprocity between the involved parties. We also found that the effect of monetary incentives and social norms cannot be clearly separable in these situations. If properly designed, monetary incentives for intermediaries can have a positive effect. On the one hand, when intermediary rewards are aligned with the trustor’s interest, investments and returns tend to increase. On the other hand, fixed monetary incentives perform less than any other incentive schemes and endogenous social norms in ensuring trust and fairness. These findings should make us reconsider the mantra of incentivization of social and public conventional policy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giangiacomo Bravo
Flaminio Squazzoni
Károly Takács
spellingShingle Giangiacomo Bravo
Flaminio Squazzoni
Károly Takács
Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
Journal of Applied Mathematics
author_facet Giangiacomo Bravo
Flaminio Squazzoni
Károly Takács
author_sort Giangiacomo Bravo
title Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
title_short Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
title_full Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
title_fullStr Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
title_full_unstemmed Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms
title_sort intermediaries in trust: indirect reciprocity, incentives, and norms
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Applied Mathematics
issn 1110-757X
1687-0042
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Any trust situation involves a certain amount of risk for trustors that trustees could abuse. In some cases, intermediaries exist who play a crucial role in the exchange by providing reputational information. To examine under what conditions intermediary opinion could have a positive impact on cooperation, we designed two experiments based on a modified version of the investment game where intermediaries rated the behaviour of trustees under various incentive schemes and different role structures. We found that intermediaries can increase trust if there is room for indirect reciprocity between the involved parties. We also found that the effect of monetary incentives and social norms cannot be clearly separable in these situations. If properly designed, monetary incentives for intermediaries can have a positive effect. On the one hand, when intermediary rewards are aligned with the trustor’s interest, investments and returns tend to increase. On the other hand, fixed monetary incentives perform less than any other incentive schemes and endogenous social norms in ensuring trust and fairness. These findings should make us reconsider the mantra of incentivization of social and public conventional policy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528
work_keys_str_mv AT giangiacomobravo intermediariesintrustindirectreciprocityincentivesandnorms
AT flaminiosquazzoni intermediariesintrustindirectreciprocityincentivesandnorms
AT karolytakacs intermediariesintrustindirectreciprocityincentivesandnorms
_version_ 1716787806847631360