Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-rated health (SRH) is a robust predictor of mortality. In UK, migrants of South Asian descent, compared to native Caucasian populations, have substantially poorer SRH. Despite its validation among migrant South Asian populations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jafar Tazeen H, Ahmad Khabir, Chaturvedi Nish
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/51
id doaj-1fd291da67034a7ab73a8a683f0531d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1fd291da67034a7ab73a8a683f0531d32020-11-24T22:18:00ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582005-05-01515110.1186/1471-2458-5-51Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health surveyJafar Tazeen HAhmad KhabirChaturvedi Nish<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-rated health (SRH) is a robust predictor of mortality. In UK, migrants of South Asian descent, compared to native Caucasian populations, have substantially poorer SRH. Despite its validation among migrant South Asian populations and its popularity in developed countries as a useful public health tool, the SRH scale has not been used at a population level in countries in South Asia. We determined the prevalence of and risk factors for poor/fair SRH among individuals aged ≥15 years in Pakistan (n = 9442).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The National Health Survey of Pakistan was a cross-sectional population-based survey, conducted between 1990 and 1994, of 18 135 individuals aged 6 months and above; 9442 of them were aged ≥15 years. Our main outcome was SRH which was assessed using the question: "Would you say your health in general is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?" SRH was dichotomized into poor/fair, and good (excellent, very good, or good).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall 65.1% respondents – 51.3 % men vs. 77.2 % women – rated their health as poor/fair. We found a significant interaction between sex and age (p < 0.0001). The interaction was due to the gender differences only in the ages 15–19 years, whereas poor/fair SRH at all older ages was more prevalent among women and increased at the same rate as it did among men. We also found province of dwelling, low or middle SES, literacy, rural dwelling and current tobacco use to be independently associated with poor/fair SRH.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This is the first study reporting on poor/fair SRH at a population-level in a South Asian country. The prevalence of poor/fair health in Pakistan, especially amongst women, is one of the worst ever reported, warranting immediate attention. Further research is needed to explain why women in Pakistan have, at all ages, poorer SRH than men.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/51
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jafar Tazeen H
Ahmad Khabir
Chaturvedi Nish
spellingShingle Jafar Tazeen H
Ahmad Khabir
Chaturvedi Nish
Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey
BMC Public Health
author_facet Jafar Tazeen H
Ahmad Khabir
Chaturvedi Nish
author_sort Jafar Tazeen H
title Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey
title_short Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey
title_full Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey
title_fullStr Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey
title_full_unstemmed Self-rated health in Pakistan: results of a national health survey
title_sort self-rated health in pakistan: results of a national health survey
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2005-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-rated health (SRH) is a robust predictor of mortality. In UK, migrants of South Asian descent, compared to native Caucasian populations, have substantially poorer SRH. Despite its validation among migrant South Asian populations and its popularity in developed countries as a useful public health tool, the SRH scale has not been used at a population level in countries in South Asia. We determined the prevalence of and risk factors for poor/fair SRH among individuals aged ≥15 years in Pakistan (n = 9442).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The National Health Survey of Pakistan was a cross-sectional population-based survey, conducted between 1990 and 1994, of 18 135 individuals aged 6 months and above; 9442 of them were aged ≥15 years. Our main outcome was SRH which was assessed using the question: "Would you say your health in general is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?" SRH was dichotomized into poor/fair, and good (excellent, very good, or good).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall 65.1% respondents – 51.3 % men vs. 77.2 % women – rated their health as poor/fair. We found a significant interaction between sex and age (p < 0.0001). The interaction was due to the gender differences only in the ages 15–19 years, whereas poor/fair SRH at all older ages was more prevalent among women and increased at the same rate as it did among men. We also found province of dwelling, low or middle SES, literacy, rural dwelling and current tobacco use to be independently associated with poor/fair SRH.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This is the first study reporting on poor/fair SRH at a population-level in a South Asian country. The prevalence of poor/fair health in Pakistan, especially amongst women, is one of the worst ever reported, warranting immediate attention. Further research is needed to explain why women in Pakistan have, at all ages, poorer SRH than men.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/51
work_keys_str_mv AT jafartazeenh selfratedhealthinpakistanresultsofanationalhealthsurvey
AT ahmadkhabir selfratedhealthinpakistanresultsofanationalhealthsurvey
AT chaturvedinish selfratedhealthinpakistanresultsofanationalhealthsurvey
_version_ 1725783416190795776