Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea

Abstract In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the evaluating Member State (EMS) Italy received an application from Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd to set maximum residue levels (MRL) for the active substance propargite in imported citrus fruits and tea. Italy drafted an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-02-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
tea
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5193
id doaj-1fae37af0c0149ccb60fd404886ff852
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1fae37af0c0149ccb60fd404886ff8522021-05-02T19:30:18ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322018-02-01162n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5193Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and teaEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Abstract In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the evaluating Member State (EMS) Italy received an application from Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd to set maximum residue levels (MRL) for the active substance propargite in imported citrus fruits and tea. Italy drafted an evaluation report in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, which was submitted to the European Commission and forwarded to EFSA. According to EFSA, the data are sufficient to derive a MRL proposal of 4 mg/kg for oranges only, as the extrapolation to the whole group is not supported by the EU rules. Based on the residue trials, an MRL of 50 mg/kg for tea could be derived. However, a risk manager decision is required whether the setting of a MRL of 50 mg/kg for tea is acceptable since the MRL reported to be into force in India is 10 mg/kg. Adequate analytical enforcement methods are available to control the residues of propargite on the commodities under consideration. Since the enforcement method of analysis is not enantioselective, residues are determined as the sum of any possible isomer ratio of the active substance propargite. EFSA concluded that the use of propargite on oranges and tea as reported in the countries of origin will not result in a consumer exposure exceeding the toxicological reference values and therefore is unlikely to pose a consumer health risk. However, it should be noted that the risk assessment is affected by uncertainties linked to the toxicological profile and the reliability of results for some of the metabolites included in the residue definition and it is applicable to the technical propargite with the isomer ratio 99:1 under assessment.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5193propargitecitrus fruitsteaMRL applicationconsumer risk assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
spellingShingle European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
EFSA Journal
propargite
citrus fruits
tea
MRL application
consumer risk assessment
author_facet European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
author_sort European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
title Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
title_short Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
title_full Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
title_fullStr Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
title_full_unstemmed Setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
title_sort setting of maximum residue limits for propargite in citrus fruits and tea
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Abstract In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the evaluating Member State (EMS) Italy received an application from Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd to set maximum residue levels (MRL) for the active substance propargite in imported citrus fruits and tea. Italy drafted an evaluation report in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, which was submitted to the European Commission and forwarded to EFSA. According to EFSA, the data are sufficient to derive a MRL proposal of 4 mg/kg for oranges only, as the extrapolation to the whole group is not supported by the EU rules. Based on the residue trials, an MRL of 50 mg/kg for tea could be derived. However, a risk manager decision is required whether the setting of a MRL of 50 mg/kg for tea is acceptable since the MRL reported to be into force in India is 10 mg/kg. Adequate analytical enforcement methods are available to control the residues of propargite on the commodities under consideration. Since the enforcement method of analysis is not enantioselective, residues are determined as the sum of any possible isomer ratio of the active substance propargite. EFSA concluded that the use of propargite on oranges and tea as reported in the countries of origin will not result in a consumer exposure exceeding the toxicological reference values and therefore is unlikely to pose a consumer health risk. However, it should be noted that the risk assessment is affected by uncertainties linked to the toxicological profile and the reliability of results for some of the metabolites included in the residue definition and it is applicable to the technical propargite with the isomer ratio 99:1 under assessment.
topic propargite
citrus fruits
tea
MRL application
consumer risk assessment
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5193
work_keys_str_mv AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa settingofmaximumresiduelimitsforpropargiteincitrusfruitsandtea
_version_ 1721488058684014592