Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Physical activity is known to have health benefits across population groups. However, less is known about changes over time in socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity and the reasons for the changes. We hypothesis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lahelma Eero, Rahkonen Ossi, Lahti Jouni, Seiluri Tina, Lallukka Tea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-03-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Online Access:http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/14
id doaj-1f9c0220a0df42f38f2cf27c332b176d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f9c0220a0df42f38f2cf27c332b176d2020-11-24T21:34:21ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682011-03-01811410.1186/1479-5868-8-14Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up studyLahelma EeroRahkonen OssiLahti JouniSeiluri TinaLallukka Tea<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Physical activity is known to have health benefits across population groups. However, less is known about changes over time in socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity and the reasons for the changes. We hypothesised that class differences in leisure-time physical activity would widen over time due to declining physical activity among the lower occupational classes. We examined whether occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity change over time in a cohort of Finnish middle-aged women and men. We also examined whether a set of selected covariates could account for the observed changes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The data were derived from the Helsinki Health Study cohort mail surveys; the respondents were 40-60-year-old employees of the City of Helsinki at baseline in 2000-2002 (n = 8960, response rate 67%). Follow-up questionnaires were sent to the baseline respondents in 2007 (n = 7332, response rate 83%). The outcome measure was leisure-time physical activity, including commuting, converted to metabolic equivalent tasks (MET). Socioeconomic position was measured by occupational class (professionals, semi-professionals, routine non-manual employees and manual workers). The covariates included baseline age, marital status, limiting long-lasting illness, common mental disorders, job strain, physical and mental health functioning, smoking, body mass index, and employment status at follow-up. Firstly the analyses focused on changes over time in age adjusted prevalence of leisure-time physical activity. Secondly, logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for covariates of changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At baseline there were no occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity. Over the follow-up leisure-time physical activity increased among those in the higher classes and decreased among manual workers, suggesting the emergence of occupational class differences at follow-up. Women in routine non-manual and manual classes and men in the manual class tended to be more often physically inactive in their leisure-time (<14 MET hours/week) and to be less often active (>30 MET hours/week) than those in the top two classes. Adjustment for the covariates did not substantially affect the observed occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity at follow-up.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity emerged over the follow-up period among both women and men. Leisure-time physical activity needs to be promoted among ageing employees, especially among manual workers.</p> http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lahelma Eero
Rahkonen Ossi
Lahti Jouni
Seiluri Tina
Lallukka Tea
spellingShingle Lahelma Eero
Rahkonen Ossi
Lahti Jouni
Seiluri Tina
Lallukka Tea
Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
author_facet Lahelma Eero
Rahkonen Ossi
Lahti Jouni
Seiluri Tina
Lallukka Tea
author_sort Lahelma Eero
title Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
title_short Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
title_full Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
title_fullStr Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
title_sort changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity: a follow-up study
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
issn 1479-5868
publishDate 2011-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Physical activity is known to have health benefits across population groups. However, less is known about changes over time in socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity and the reasons for the changes. We hypothesised that class differences in leisure-time physical activity would widen over time due to declining physical activity among the lower occupational classes. We examined whether occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity change over time in a cohort of Finnish middle-aged women and men. We also examined whether a set of selected covariates could account for the observed changes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The data were derived from the Helsinki Health Study cohort mail surveys; the respondents were 40-60-year-old employees of the City of Helsinki at baseline in 2000-2002 (n = 8960, response rate 67%). Follow-up questionnaires were sent to the baseline respondents in 2007 (n = 7332, response rate 83%). The outcome measure was leisure-time physical activity, including commuting, converted to metabolic equivalent tasks (MET). Socioeconomic position was measured by occupational class (professionals, semi-professionals, routine non-manual employees and manual workers). The covariates included baseline age, marital status, limiting long-lasting illness, common mental disorders, job strain, physical and mental health functioning, smoking, body mass index, and employment status at follow-up. Firstly the analyses focused on changes over time in age adjusted prevalence of leisure-time physical activity. Secondly, logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for covariates of changes in occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At baseline there were no occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity. Over the follow-up leisure-time physical activity increased among those in the higher classes and decreased among manual workers, suggesting the emergence of occupational class differences at follow-up. Women in routine non-manual and manual classes and men in the manual class tended to be more often physically inactive in their leisure-time (<14 MET hours/week) and to be less often active (>30 MET hours/week) than those in the top two classes. Adjustment for the covariates did not substantially affect the observed occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity at follow-up.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Occupational class differences in leisure-time physical activity emerged over the follow-up period among both women and men. Leisure-time physical activity needs to be promoted among ageing employees, especially among manual workers.</p>
url http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT lahelmaeero changesinoccupationalclassdifferencesinleisuretimephysicalactivityafollowupstudy
AT rahkonenossi changesinoccupationalclassdifferencesinleisuretimephysicalactivityafollowupstudy
AT lahtijouni changesinoccupationalclassdifferencesinleisuretimephysicalactivityafollowupstudy
AT seiluritina changesinoccupationalclassdifferencesinleisuretimephysicalactivityafollowupstudy
AT lallukkatea changesinoccupationalclassdifferencesinleisuretimephysicalactivityafollowupstudy
_version_ 1725949768427896832