Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
Background: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety cu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Safety and Health at Work |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117303657 |
id |
doaj-1f93504dc0f54ba8af788cb053476952 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1f93504dc0f54ba8af788cb0534769522020-11-24T23:14:07ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112018-09-0193296307Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical SystemsGholamabbas Shirali0Mohammad Shekari1Kambiz Ahmadi Angali2Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran; Corresponding author. Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 61355-131, Ahvaz, Iran.Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranBackground: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety culture; however, it requires a valid and reliable instrument to be measured. This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of such an instrument in measuring the RSC in sociotechnical systems. Methods: The researchers designed an instrument based on resilience engineering principles and safety culture as the first instrument to measure the RSC. The RSC instrument was distributed among 354 staff members from 12 units of an anonymous petrochemical plant through hand delivery. Content validity, confirmatory, and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach alpha and test-retest were employed to examine the reliability of the instrument. Results: The results of the content validity index and content validity ratio were calculated as 0.97 and 0.83, respectively. The explanatory factor analysis showed 14 factors with 68.29% total variance and 0.88 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index. The results were also confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis (relative Chi-square = 2453.49, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.04). The reliability of the RSC instrument, as measured by internal consistency, was found to be satisfactory (Cronbach α = 0.94). The results of test-retest reliability was r = 0.85, p < 0.001. Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the measure shows acceptable validity and reliability. Keywords: Instrument, Reliability, Resilience safety culture, Validityhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117303657 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gholamabbas Shirali Mohammad Shekari Kambiz Ahmadi Angali |
spellingShingle |
Gholamabbas Shirali Mohammad Shekari Kambiz Ahmadi Angali Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems Safety and Health at Work |
author_facet |
Gholamabbas Shirali Mohammad Shekari Kambiz Ahmadi Angali |
author_sort |
Gholamabbas Shirali |
title |
Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems |
title_short |
Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems |
title_full |
Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems |
title_fullStr |
Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems |
title_sort |
assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Safety and Health at Work |
issn |
2093-7911 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Background: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety culture; however, it requires a valid and reliable instrument to be measured. This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of such an instrument in measuring the RSC in sociotechnical systems. Methods: The researchers designed an instrument based on resilience engineering principles and safety culture as the first instrument to measure the RSC. The RSC instrument was distributed among 354 staff members from 12 units of an anonymous petrochemical plant through hand delivery. Content validity, confirmatory, and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach alpha and test-retest were employed to examine the reliability of the instrument. Results: The results of the content validity index and content validity ratio were calculated as 0.97 and 0.83, respectively. The explanatory factor analysis showed 14 factors with 68.29% total variance and 0.88 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index. The results were also confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis (relative Chi-square = 2453.49, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.04). The reliability of the RSC instrument, as measured by internal consistency, was found to be satisfactory (Cronbach α = 0.94). The results of test-retest reliability was r = 0.85, p < 0.001. Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the measure shows acceptable validity and reliability. Keywords: Instrument, Reliability, Resilience safety culture, Validity |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117303657 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gholamabbasshirali assessingreliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumentformeasuringresiliencesafetycultureinsociotechnicalsystems AT mohammadshekari assessingreliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumentformeasuringresiliencesafetycultureinsociotechnicalsystems AT kambizahmadiangali assessingreliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumentformeasuringresiliencesafetycultureinsociotechnicalsystems |
_version_ |
1725595877157896192 |