Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems

Background: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety cu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gholamabbas Shirali, Mohammad Shekari, Kambiz Ahmadi Angali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-09-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117303657
id doaj-1f93504dc0f54ba8af788cb053476952
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f93504dc0f54ba8af788cb0534769522020-11-24T23:14:07ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112018-09-0193296307Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical SystemsGholamabbas Shirali0Mohammad Shekari1Kambiz Ahmadi Angali2Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran; Corresponding author. Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 61355-131, Ahvaz, Iran.Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranBackground: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety culture; however, it requires a valid and reliable instrument to be measured. This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of such an instrument in measuring the RSC in sociotechnical systems. Methods: The researchers designed an instrument based on resilience engineering principles and safety culture as the first instrument to measure the RSC. The RSC instrument was distributed among 354 staff members from 12 units of an anonymous petrochemical plant through hand delivery. Content validity, confirmatory, and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach alpha and test-retest were employed to examine the reliability of the instrument. Results: The results of the content validity index and content validity ratio were calculated as 0.97 and 0.83, respectively. The explanatory factor analysis showed 14 factors with 68.29% total variance and 0.88 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index. The results were also confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis (relative Chi-square = 2453.49, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.04). The reliability of the RSC instrument, as measured by internal consistency, was found to be satisfactory (Cronbach α = 0.94). The results of test-retest reliability was r = 0.85, p < 0.001. Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the measure shows acceptable validity and reliability. Keywords: Instrument, Reliability, Resilience safety culture, Validityhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117303657
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gholamabbas Shirali
Mohammad Shekari
Kambiz Ahmadi Angali
spellingShingle Gholamabbas Shirali
Mohammad Shekari
Kambiz Ahmadi Angali
Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
Safety and Health at Work
author_facet Gholamabbas Shirali
Mohammad Shekari
Kambiz Ahmadi Angali
author_sort Gholamabbas Shirali
title Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
title_short Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
title_full Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
title_fullStr Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems
title_sort assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems
publisher Elsevier
series Safety and Health at Work
issn 2093-7911
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Background: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety culture; however, it requires a valid and reliable instrument to be measured. This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of such an instrument in measuring the RSC in sociotechnical systems. Methods: The researchers designed an instrument based on resilience engineering principles and safety culture as the first instrument to measure the RSC. The RSC instrument was distributed among 354 staff members from 12 units of an anonymous petrochemical plant through hand delivery. Content validity, confirmatory, and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity, and Cronbach alpha and test-retest were employed to examine the reliability of the instrument. Results: The results of the content validity index and content validity ratio were calculated as 0.97 and 0.83, respectively. The explanatory factor analysis showed 14 factors with 68.29% total variance and 0.88 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index. The results were also confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis (relative Chi-square = 2453.49, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.04). The reliability of the RSC instrument, as measured by internal consistency, was found to be satisfactory (Cronbach α = 0.94). The results of test-retest reliability was r = 0.85, p < 0.001. Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the measure shows acceptable validity and reliability. Keywords: Instrument, Reliability, Resilience safety culture, Validity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117303657
work_keys_str_mv AT gholamabbasshirali assessingreliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumentformeasuringresiliencesafetycultureinsociotechnicalsystems
AT mohammadshekari assessingreliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumentformeasuringresiliencesafetycultureinsociotechnicalsystems
AT kambizahmadiangali assessingreliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumentformeasuringresiliencesafetycultureinsociotechnicalsystems
_version_ 1725595877157896192