Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
Bertram Meyer,1 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde,2 Matthias Wottke2 1Augencentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany; 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (T...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2015-02-01
|
Series: | Clinical Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://www.dovepress.com/refractive-outcomes-of-an-advanced-aspherically-optimized-profile-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
id |
doaj-1f8bf33b054b4ff5bd980645e5816815 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1f8bf33b054b4ff5bd980645e58168152020-11-24T23:45:03ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832015-02-012015default37939220587Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profileMeyer BSluyterman van Langeweyde GWottke M Bertram Meyer,1 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde,2 Matthias Wottke2 1Augencentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany; 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (Triple-A) and the conventionally used aspherically optimized profile (ASA, or aberration smart ablation) for correction of low-to-high myopia.Setting: Augen-OP-Centrum, Cologne, GermanyDesign: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative studyMethods: A central database at the Augen-OP-Centrum was used to gather retrospective data for low-to-high myopia (up to -10 D). One hundred and seven eyes (56 patients) were treated with the ASA profile, and 79 eyes (46 patients) were treated with the Triple-A profile. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up time points.Results: The Triple-A profile showed better predictability indicated by a significantly lower standard deviation of residuals (0.32–0.34 vs 0.36–0.44, Triple-A vs ASA) in the 6-month to 1-year period. The Triple-A group had better stability across all time intervals and achieved better postoperative astigmatism improvements with significantly lower scatter. This group achieved better safety at 1 year, with 100% of eyes showing no change or gain in Snellen lines, compared with 97% in the ASA group. A better safety index was observed for the Triple-A group at later time points. The Triple-A group had a better efficacy index and a higher percentage of eyes with an uncorrected Snellen visual acuity of 20/20 or greater at all investigated follow-up time points.Conclusion: The new aspherically optimized Triple-A profile can safely and effectively correct low-to-high myopia. It has demonstrated superiority over the ASA profile in most refractive outcomes. Keywords: Triple-A, wavefront measurements, corneal aberrations, corneal asphericity, ablation profilehttp://www.dovepress.com/refractive-outcomes-of-an-advanced-aspherically-optimized-profile-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Meyer B Sluyterman van Langeweyde G Wottke M |
spellingShingle |
Meyer B Sluyterman van Langeweyde G Wottke M Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile Clinical Ophthalmology |
author_facet |
Meyer B Sluyterman van Langeweyde G Wottke M |
author_sort |
Meyer B |
title |
Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile |
title_short |
Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile |
title_full |
Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile |
title_fullStr |
Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile |
title_full_unstemmed |
Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile |
title_sort |
refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by lasik: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Clinical Ophthalmology |
issn |
1177-5483 |
publishDate |
2015-02-01 |
description |
Bertram Meyer,1 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde,2 Matthias Wottke2 1Augencentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany; 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (Triple-A) and the conventionally used aspherically optimized profile (ASA, or aberration smart ablation) for correction of low-to-high myopia.Setting: Augen-OP-Centrum, Cologne, GermanyDesign: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative studyMethods: A central database at the Augen-OP-Centrum was used to gather retrospective data for low-to-high myopia (up to -10 D). One hundred and seven eyes (56 patients) were treated with the ASA profile, and 79 eyes (46 patients) were treated with the Triple-A profile. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up time points.Results: The Triple-A profile showed better predictability indicated by a significantly lower standard deviation of residuals (0.32–0.34 vs 0.36–0.44, Triple-A vs ASA) in the 6-month to 1-year period. The Triple-A group had better stability across all time intervals and achieved better postoperative astigmatism improvements with significantly lower scatter. This group achieved better safety at 1 year, with 100% of eyes showing no change or gain in Snellen lines, compared with 97% in the ASA group. A better safety index was observed for the Triple-A group at later time points. The Triple-A group had a better efficacy index and a higher percentage of eyes with an uncorrected Snellen visual acuity of 20/20 or greater at all investigated follow-up time points.Conclusion: The new aspherically optimized Triple-A profile can safely and effectively correct low-to-high myopia. It has demonstrated superiority over the ASA profile in most refractive outcomes. Keywords: Triple-A, wavefront measurements, corneal aberrations, corneal asphericity, ablation profile |
url |
http://www.dovepress.com/refractive-outcomes-of-an-advanced-aspherically-optimized-profile-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT meyerb refractiveoutcomesofanadvancedasphericallyoptimizedprofileformyopiacorrectionsbylasikaretrospectivecomparisonwiththestandardasphericallyoptimizedprofile AT sluytermanvanlangeweydeg refractiveoutcomesofanadvancedasphericallyoptimizedprofileformyopiacorrectionsbylasikaretrospectivecomparisonwiththestandardasphericallyoptimizedprofile AT wottkem refractiveoutcomesofanadvancedasphericallyoptimizedprofileformyopiacorrectionsbylasikaretrospectivecomparisonwiththestandardasphericallyoptimizedprofile |
_version_ |
1725497434898956288 |