Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile

Bertram Meyer,1 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde,2 Matthias Wottke2 1Augencentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany; 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meyer B, Sluyterman van Langeweyde G, Wottke M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-02-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/refractive-outcomes-of-an-advanced-aspherically-optimized-profile-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
id doaj-1f8bf33b054b4ff5bd980645e5816815
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f8bf33b054b4ff5bd980645e58168152020-11-24T23:45:03ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832015-02-012015default37939220587Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profileMeyer BSluyterman van Langeweyde GWottke M Bertram Meyer,1 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde,2 Matthias Wottke2 1Augencentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany; 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (Triple-A) and the conventionally used aspherically optimized profile (ASA, or aberration smart ablation) for correction of low-to-high myopia.Setting: Augen-OP-Centrum, Cologne, GermanyDesign: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative studyMethods: A central database at the Augen-OP-Centrum was used to gather retrospective data for low-to-high myopia (up to -10 D). One hundred and seven eyes (56 patients) were treated with the ASA profile, and 79 eyes (46 patients) were treated with the Triple-A profile. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up time points.Results: The Triple-A profile showed better predictability indicated by a significantly lower standard deviation of residuals (0.32–0.34 vs 0.36–0.44, Triple-A vs ASA) in the 6-month to 1-year period. The Triple-A group had better stability across all time intervals and achieved better postoperative astigmatism improvements with significantly lower scatter. This group achieved better safety at 1 year, with 100% of eyes showing no change or gain in Snellen lines, compared with 97% in the ASA group. A better safety index was observed for the Triple-A group at later time points. The Triple-A group had a better efficacy index and a higher percentage of eyes with an uncorrected Snellen visual acuity of 20/20 or greater at all investigated follow-up time points.Conclusion: The new aspherically optimized Triple-A profile can safely and effectively correct low-to-high myopia. It has demonstrated superiority over the ASA profile in most refractive outcomes. Keywords: Triple-A, wavefront measurements, corneal aberrations, corneal asphericity, ablation profilehttp://www.dovepress.com/refractive-outcomes-of-an-advanced-aspherically-optimized-profile-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meyer B
Sluyterman van Langeweyde G
Wottke M
spellingShingle Meyer B
Sluyterman van Langeweyde G
Wottke M
Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Meyer B
Sluyterman van Langeweyde G
Wottke M
author_sort Meyer B
title Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
title_short Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
title_full Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
title_fullStr Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
title_full_unstemmed Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
title_sort refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by lasik: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5483
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Bertram Meyer,1 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde,2 Matthias Wottke2 1Augencentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany; 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (Triple-A) and the conventionally used aspherically optimized profile (ASA, or aberration smart ablation) for correction of low-to-high myopia.Setting: Augen-OP-Centrum, Cologne, GermanyDesign: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative studyMethods: A central database at the Augen-OP-Centrum was used to gather retrospective data for low-to-high myopia (up to -10 D). One hundred and seven eyes (56 patients) were treated with the ASA profile, and 79 eyes (46 patients) were treated with the Triple-A profile. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up time points.Results: The Triple-A profile showed better predictability indicated by a significantly lower standard deviation of residuals (0.32–0.34 vs 0.36–0.44, Triple-A vs ASA) in the 6-month to 1-year period. The Triple-A group had better stability across all time intervals and achieved better postoperative astigmatism improvements with significantly lower scatter. This group achieved better safety at 1 year, with 100% of eyes showing no change or gain in Snellen lines, compared with 97% in the ASA group. A better safety index was observed for the Triple-A group at later time points. The Triple-A group had a better efficacy index and a higher percentage of eyes with an uncorrected Snellen visual acuity of 20/20 or greater at all investigated follow-up time points.Conclusion: The new aspherically optimized Triple-A profile can safely and effectively correct low-to-high myopia. It has demonstrated superiority over the ASA profile in most refractive outcomes. Keywords: Triple-A, wavefront measurements, corneal aberrations, corneal asphericity, ablation profile
url http://www.dovepress.com/refractive-outcomes-of-an-advanced-aspherically-optimized-profile-for--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerb refractiveoutcomesofanadvancedasphericallyoptimizedprofileformyopiacorrectionsbylasikaretrospectivecomparisonwiththestandardasphericallyoptimizedprofile
AT sluytermanvanlangeweydeg refractiveoutcomesofanadvancedasphericallyoptimizedprofileformyopiacorrectionsbylasikaretrospectivecomparisonwiththestandardasphericallyoptimizedprofile
AT wottkem refractiveoutcomesofanadvancedasphericallyoptimizedprofileformyopiacorrectionsbylasikaretrospectivecomparisonwiththestandardasphericallyoptimizedprofile
_version_ 1725497434898956288